User talk:Urartu TH: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:54, 15 March 2014 editGrandmaster (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,547 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:59, 15 March 2014 edit undoSandstein (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,569 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit →
Line 81:		Line 81:
	== ] ==		== ] ==
	Hi. Please be aware of this discussion at WP:AE: . Thanks. ]] 00:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)		Hi. Please be aware of this discussion at WP:AE: . Thanks. ]] 00:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

			== March 2014 ==
			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision, and for violations of the principles outlined in ], ]and ] in your statement to ], see , you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 09:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock -->

Revision as of 09:59, 15 March 2014

Hello Urartu TH, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Misplaced Pages's mark-up codes
Misplaced Pages's 5 pillars – an overview of Misplaced Pages's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Misplaced Pages's most important rules
Guide to Misplaced Pages – a thorough step-by-step guide to Misplaced Pages

How you can help:

Contributing to Misplaced Pages – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Misplaced Pages's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Misplaced Pages's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Urartu TH, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) 21:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Urartu TH, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Urartu TH! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

AA2

Please be aware of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 before making further reverts. Thanks. Grandmaster 18:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I'm quite aware of it. You'll have to be more specific as I'm not sure of your point. You have been the one making reverts and adding controversial material. Thanks.--Urartu TH

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Khojaly Massacre#Number_of_civilians_affected". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 10:19, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Please reach consensus before making controversial edits to Khojaly Massacre. There's a discussion thread opened at talk, where you can discuss your proposed edits, and you can try WP:DR. Grandmaster 22:27, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 14 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Arseniy Yatsenyuk page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

WP:AE

Hi. Please be aware of this discussion at WP:AE: . Thanks. Grandmaster 00:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violations of the principles outlined in WP:NPA, WP:AGFand WP:ASPERSIONS in your statement to WP:AE, see the related thread, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Sandstein 09:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.