| Revision as of 22:48, 24 March 2014 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,069 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Management (FWDS)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:02, 25 March 2014 edit undoKuru (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators204,644 edits note deletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. ] (]) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. ] (]) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::It isn't. None of the sources appear to mention "super team" that I could tell. In reviewing the first cite, which appears to be someone's college term paper, it appears that most of the material in the article was copied word for word. I've deleted the article as a copyright infringement accordingly. It's been a while since I've closed an AFD, so if someone could do that for me. ] ] 02:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| I've added a ''to do'' list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. ] (]) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | I've added a ''to do'' list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. ] (]) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:02, 25 March 2014
Super-team
- Super-team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears to be a non notable business jargon neologism. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
This is a significant term when discussing collaboration among high ranking professionals on a project that requires high level expertise in multiple areas. Stmullin (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- It isn't. None of the sources appear to mention "super team" that I could tell. In reviewing the first cite, which appears to be someone's college term paper, it appears that most of the material in the article was copied word for word. I've deleted the article as a copyright infringement accordingly. It's been a while since I've closed an AFD, so if someone could do that for me. Kuru (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I've added a to do list and links to existing articles. This article is not specific to one industry so can not be construed as jargon. It is a leadership concept as well as a term. 174.99.59.109 (talk) 19:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 24 March 2014 (UTC)