Revision as of 18:48, 25 March 2014 editGaijin42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,866 edits →Duplicate: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:51, 25 March 2014 edit undoSmlombardi (talk | contribs)1,651 edits →DuplicateNext edit → | ||
Line 470: | Line 470: | ||
Do you agree that ] is the same topic as ] If so, you could save us all a lot of trouble and just redirect it. ] (]) 18:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | Do you agree that ] is the same topic as ] If so, you could save us all a lot of trouble and just redirect it. ] (]) 18:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Yes. ] (]) 18:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:51, 25 March 2014
Welcome!
This is Smlombardi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Misplaced Pages:Welcome
Hello, Stmullin, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I'm Mr. Stradivarius, one of the thousands of editors here at Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Fun stuff...
{{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Mr. Stradivarius 15:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Archive links
Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Constructivism (philosophy of education), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Philosophy of Education article
Hi Stmullin. Philosophical and sociological perspectives on social change, influence, equality, etc. are of course related, although whether that means sociology deserves direct reference (for indirect relationship) I'm not sure. In any case, philosophy should obviously be there, psychology has a reference, I think the addition of sociology should include a good reference (a review maybe?) which indicates the relationship between soc & phil of education. Sjgknight (talk) 17:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
This Month in Education: March 2014
Nomination of Super-team for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super-team is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Super-team until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC) Only warningPlease note, that your article was a word for word lift from the first cite given. If you restore a blatant copyright problem again, you are risking being blocked. Stop, and explain your actions. Kuru (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC) WRONG . . . Stmullin (talk) 02:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The article was correctly cited from multiple sources. the first source was the most concise and was referenced and paraphrased correctly which is NOT copy right violation, the language you are using is not only harsh but blatantly WRONG!!!!Stmullin (talk) 02:36, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Super-team
A tag has been placed on Super-team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-72/108%20Sharp%20cnfHighPerfTeams.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC) March 2014Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC) I have filed for arbitration against you . . . you are out of control.Stmullin (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC) ANIThere is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DuplicateDo you agree that Super-team is the same topic as High-performance teams If so, you could save us all a lot of trouble and just redirect it. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC) |