Revision as of 08:53, 27 March 2014 editPetergriffin9901 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,014 edits Undid revision 601479351 by IndianBio (talk)Obnoxious. Off my page dude← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:54, 27 March 2014 edit undoIndianBio (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers61,823 edits →March 2014: Final warning for edit warringNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:: Yeah good thanks. How are you? — ] 17:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) | :: Yeah good thanks. How are you? — ] 17:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Good :) In my last year in university, working; been keeping busy! I see over time we've lost almost all our music-article veterans :S--] • ] 01:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | :::Good :) In my last year in university, working; been keeping busy! I see over time we've lost almost all our music-article veterans :S--] • ] 01:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
==March 2014== | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}You either stop edit warring else face a report to ] noticeboard<!-- Template:uw-ew --> —] · <sup>] ]</sup> 08:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:54, 27 March 2014
If you have reason to leave a comment, question or suggestion, please click here and start a new section.
Thanks for stopping by. PS. I find it funny when editors address me as "Call Me Nathan". That's not the point! You're supposed to call me "Nathan".
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you. |
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Song article: "All I want for Christmas is you"
Hello Nathan- I'm Tom, aka Nuance 4 (my vocal jazz group). I'm a DJ at WMKV-FM 89.3 in Cincy.
Let me tell you of a frustration of mine: When someone writes a book, or a song, it is copyrighted to insure its intellectual property rights to the owner/creator. HOWEVER, under this law, the TITLE of the work is not protected, and someone else can create a completely new work, but legally use an old title. For example, "Band Of Brothers" can refer to several different books written over many decades. This means for someone seeking a specific work, he may have to eliminate several other ambiguous works with the same title.
It is for this reason that last January I added a short paragraph "Ambiguity" to "All I want for Christmas is you". If someone is looking for a cover version of Mariah Carey's song, he might accidentally buy the song Johnny Mandel wrote - since there is a Tony Bennett recording with the same (albeit erroneous) title. You decided this caveat was unnecessary and deleted it October 30. If you think it through, I ask you to reconsider this, since it can save a buyer some grief.
Let me know what you think.
Tom
Hi
Hello, I see you're a lambily, I'm contributing in spanish wikipedia, Mimi items are neglected, I ask your help. Danny toons
Long time
no see! — ₳aron 19:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hey buddy :) How you been?--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 16:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah good thanks. How are you? — ₳aron 17:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Good :) In my last year in university, working; been keeping busy! I see over time we've lost almost all our music-article veterans :S--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 01:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah good thanks. How are you? — ₳aron 17:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mariah Carey. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
You either stop edit warring else face a report to WP:EW noticeboard —Indian:BIO · 08:54, 27 March 2014 (UTC)