| Revision as of 04:34, 31 March 2014 editIIIraute (talk | contribs)5,842 edits →asmallworld: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:35, 31 March 2014 edit undoIIIraute (talk | contribs)5,842 edits →asmallworld: ceNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| no source on this page is reliable, it is all advertising as indicated by the wikipedia box at the top of the page, and the fact that each citation just links to quotes from the owners and other financially interested parties. critical information about the website exists in many forms - one of my sources was the independent, a british newspaper - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/asmallworld-nestl-heir-patrick-liotardvogt-a-jetrosexual-website-and-a-3m-dispute-9084223.html - what makes this less reliable than any other source cited? | no source on this page is reliable, it is all advertising as indicated by the wikipedia box at the top of the page, and the fact that each citation just links to quotes from the owners and other financially interested parties. critical information about the website exists in many forms - one of my sources was the independent, a british newspaper - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/asmallworld-nestl-heir-patrick-liotardvogt-a-jetrosexual-website-and-a-3m-dispute-9084223.html - what makes this less reliable than any other source cited? | ||
| :], I can and will help you to write a "controversies" section - but not with the current sources you have provided, as I think we can do better (the "The Independent" source is ok) - |
:], I can and will help you to write a "controversies" section - but not with the current sources you have provided, as they are not suitable per ], and I think we can do better (the "The Independent" source is ok) - also, please stop your edit warring. No hard feelings! --] (]) 04:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:35, 31 March 2014
| This is IIIraute's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion needs your voice
You are invited to participate in the Nazi Germany VS Third Reich discussion Axelode (talk) 18:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
mistake?
? Volunteer Marek (talk) 10:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- IIIraute, I have just redacted parts of your message which, in my opinion, violated WP:ASPERSIONS. This is an admin action under WP:DIGWUREN, so, please, do not revert without discussing the issue with me beforehand.
I have however tried to maintain your points concerning the merits of the edits in question. If you believe something I have removed is necessary to get your point across (other than the eneric Volunteer Marek is a bad person and a sockmaster), please let me know and I'll try to restore it. As a side note, checkuser confirms I that Elizabeth Cumberbatch does not appear to be a sock of Volunteer Marek. Salvio 10:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar | |
| Your overall kindness and helpfulness towards me while we've been working on Rush has been immensely admirable and very much appreciated. Keep up the good work! Corvoe (speak to me) 11:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
Vandal has returned
Just to let you know that the nationalist vandal has returned to Template:List of Great powers by date after a few months' absence. Argovian (talk) 14:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. I'll keep an eye on it. --IIIraute (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
asmallworld
no source on this page is reliable, it is all advertising as indicated by the wikipedia box at the top of the page, and the fact that each citation just links to quotes from the owners and other financially interested parties. critical information about the website exists in many forms - one of my sources was the independent, a british newspaper - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/asmallworld-nestl-heir-patrick-liotardvogt-a-jetrosexual-website-and-a-3m-dispute-9084223.html - what makes this less reliable than any other source cited?
- Faceplant2020, I can and will help you to write a "controversies" section - but not with the current sources you have provided, as they are not suitable per WP:RS, and I think we can do better (the "The Independent" source is ok) - also, please stop your edit warring. No hard feelings! --IIIraute (talk) 04:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)