Revision as of 19:20, 7 April 2014 editJim1138 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,704 edits →April 2014: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:06, 8 April 2014 edit undoMrOllie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers237,611 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 19:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ] without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ] (]) 19:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
] Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 12:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:06, 8 April 2014
Scapestessa, you are invited on a Misplaced Pages Adventure!
The Adventure
Hi Scapestessa!! You're invited: learn how to edit Misplaced Pages in under an hour. Hope to see you there! Play The Misplaced Pages AdventureThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC) |
April 2014
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Banc De Binary without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. MrOllie (talk) 12:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)