Revision as of 08:55, 8 April 2014 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots670,630 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:27, 8 April 2014 edit undoMostlyoksorta (talk | contribs)298 edits →asmallworldNext edit → | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:] Sure, help me write it. No hard feeling, but I don't understand why you keep adding the fluff about the celebrities - which is linked to citation from a blog, and that doesn't mention any of the type of members listed on the wikipedia. I will keep deleting it because that is just advertising and has no cited basis from any source. Also the member card is linked to an advertising video, and the card is not claimed in that video to grant access to anything specific so it will be deleted. Please let me know what source you need to show that they promised all members a vacation (that was linked to a CNBC source which is actually cited elsewhere in the site, but that you left up. The fact that the hotel will not be full open until 2015 is cited across the internet, I don't know why the government website of the nation of St. Kitts is not acceptable, or travelocity, how else can you prove a hotel is not open? I will restore my change and you should feel free to edit them NOT DELETE them, to a manner you feel is consistent with wikipedia citing, please look at the the actual citations throughout that page. I think that in general they are not linking to any non-neutral independent sources, just to asmallworld company officials PR teams. I am curious to see what changes you will make. No hard feelings. Thanks! --] (]) 31 March 2014 (UTC) | :] Sure, help me write it. No hard feeling, but I don't understand why you keep adding the fluff about the celebrities - which is linked to citation from a blog, and that doesn't mention any of the type of members listed on the wikipedia. I will keep deleting it because that is just advertising and has no cited basis from any source. Also the member card is linked to an advertising video, and the card is not claimed in that video to grant access to anything specific so it will be deleted. Please let me know what source you need to show that they promised all members a vacation (that was linked to a CNBC source which is actually cited elsewhere in the site, but that you left up. The fact that the hotel will not be full open until 2015 is cited across the internet, I don't know why the government website of the nation of St. Kitts is not acceptable, or travelocity, how else can you prove a hotel is not open? I will restore my change and you should feel free to edit them NOT DELETE them, to a manner you feel is consistent with wikipedia citing, please look at the the actual citations throughout that page. I think that in general they are not linking to any non-neutral independent sources, just to asmallworld company officials PR teams. I am curious to see what changes you will make. No hard feelings. Thanks! --] (]) 31 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::] - I think most of the changes you just made are fine, I will let you know for a fact that there is no complimentary car service and the world's finest clubs membership now costs and additional $200. I have emails from asmallworld confirming these facts, how does one cite to emails from the company? Also, if you state that asmallworld complaints need citations, but complaint websites aren't good sources, what are? Just looking to do this in a professional way, thanks! (] (]) 16:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 8== | ==Disambiguation link notification for April 8== |
Revision as of 16:27, 8 April 2014
This is IIIraute's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
mistake?
? Volunteer Marek (talk) 10:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- IIIraute, I have just redacted parts of your message which, in my opinion, violated WP:ASPERSIONS. This is an admin action under WP:DIGWUREN, so, please, do not revert without discussing the issue with me beforehand.
I have however tried to maintain your points concerning the merits of the edits in question. If you believe something I have removed is necessary to get your point across (other than the eneric Volunteer Marek is a bad person and a sockmaster), please let me know and I'll try to restore it. As a side note, checkuser confirms I that Elizabeth Cumberbatch does not appear to be a sock of Volunteer Marek. Salvio 10:49, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, IIIraute. You have new messages at Corvoe's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A barnstar for you!
The Civility Barnstar | ||
Your overall kindness and helpfulness towards me while we've been working on Rush has been immensely admirable and very much appreciated. Keep up the good work! Corvoe (speak to me) 11:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC) |
Vandal has returned
Just to let you know that the nationalist vandal has returned to Template:List of Great powers by date after a few months' absence. Argovian (talk) 14:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. I'll keep an eye on it. --IIIraute (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
asmallworld
no source on this page is reliable, it is all advertising as indicated by the wikipedia box at the top of the page, and the fact that each citation just links to quotes from the owners and other financially interested parties. critical information about the website exists in many forms - one of my sources was the independent, a british newspaper - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/asmallworld-nestl-heir-patrick-liotardvogt-a-jetrosexual-website-and-a-3m-dispute-9084223.html - what makes this less reliable than any other source cited?
- Faceplant2020, I can and will help you to write a "controversies" section - but not with the current sources you have provided, as they are not suitable per WP:RS, and I think we can do better (the "The Independent" source is ok) - also, please stop your edit warring. No hard feelings! --IIIraute (talk) 04:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- IIIraute Sure, help me write it. No hard feeling, but I don't understand why you keep adding the fluff about the celebrities - which is linked to citation from a blog, and that doesn't mention any of the type of members listed on the wikipedia. I will keep deleting it because that is just advertising and has no cited basis from any source. Also the member card is linked to an advertising video, and the card is not claimed in that video to grant access to anything specific so it will be deleted. Please let me know what source you need to show that they promised all members a vacation (that was linked to a CNBC source which is actually cited elsewhere in the site, but that you left up. The fact that the hotel will not be full open until 2015 is cited across the internet, I don't know why the government website of the nation of St. Kitts is not acceptable, or travelocity, how else can you prove a hotel is not open? I will restore my change and you should feel free to edit them NOT DELETE them, to a manner you feel is consistent with wikipedia citing, please look at the the actual citations throughout that page. I think that in general they are not linking to any non-neutral independent sources, just to asmallworld company officials PR teams. I am curious to see what changes you will make. No hard feelings. Thanks! --Faceplant2020 (talk) 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- IIIraute - I think most of the changes you just made are fine, I will let you know for a fact that there is no complimentary car service and the world's finest clubs membership now costs and additional $200. I have emails from asmallworld confirming these facts, how does one cite to emails from the company? Also, if you state that asmallworld complaints need citations, but complaint websites aren't good sources, what are? Just looking to do this in a professional way, thanks! (Mostlyoksorta (talk) 16:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC))
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ASmallWorld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC)