Revision as of 15:50, 24 April 2014 edit2001:558:1400:10:856a:e8e3:e991:fb6f (talk) →Inaccuracies in the article: Another matter of concern← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:01, 24 April 2014 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,107 editsm Reverted edits by 2001:558:1400:10:856A:E8E3:E991:FB6F (talk) to last version by AnthonyhcoleNext edit → |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
* '''Delete''', 16 September 2006, ] |
|
* '''Delete''', 16 September 2006, ] |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Inaccuracies in the article == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have a COI with the article subject, so I am requesting attention here on the Talk page, regarding some of the content by ]. MyWikiBiz's current status is listed on Misplaced Pages as "Unknown", even though no reliable source has said that its status is anything but active, and it is (in fact) active. JzG says that "As of April 2014, the site is only intermittently available and does not appear to be updated". Granted, the site was down between April 1st and 8th, but since then, the site has registered 99.87% uptime. The site has been "updated" about 7 of the past 10 days, if by "updated" we can mean that editorial changes have been executed on the site by various users. Please discuss here if I can be of any additional help. - ] (]) 14:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, the sentence "In October 2006 Wales again blocked Kohs from Misplaced Pages, and cautioned any business from using its services" is problematic, in that it is not verified by a reliable source. Probably not a problem keeping the statement if it can be sourced, even to old Misplaced Pages diffs. But ] tells us that we must err on the side of caution, and right now this is potentially damaging to Kohs, a living person. - ] (]) 15:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC) |
|