Misplaced Pages

User talk:Perri Rhoades: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:08, 12 June 2006 editYserarau (talk | contribs)1,541 edits ok← Previous edit Revision as of 04:39, 27 June 2006 edit undo68.69.194.125 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:

'''Welcome!''' '''Welcome!'''


Line 18: Line 17:


I think I've tried to argue that my edits were agreeable with you. Please see furry fandom's talk page. ] 23:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC) I think I've tried to argue that my edits were agreeable with you. Please see furry fandom's talk page. ] 23:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

== "Vandalism" ==

My edits were not vandalism. Stating facts and backing them up with sources (Wikifur, of all places) is not vandalism. I also noticed that you tried to erase the entry which I linked to. Nice try, but unfortunately you cannot whitewash the furry fandom. I suggest you stop reverting every single edit that could possible be intrepreted negatively on the furry fandom article. ] 04:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:39, 27 June 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Perri Rhoades, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  GreenReaper 14:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Hero

You are my new hero, for your summarizing of the massive content on furry fandom. I think I am fast becoming an enemy of some fans that think that verifiability via published sources shouldn't apply to furries. Thank you for restoring in my mind the possibility of people that know a topic personally not being the worst editors of it ever. LovelyLotusduck 04:44, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

ok

I think I've tried to argue that my edits were agreeable with you. Please see furry fandom's talk page. DyslexicEditor 23:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

My edits were not vandalism. Stating facts and backing them up with sources (Wikifur, of all places) is not vandalism. I also noticed that you tried to erase the entry which I linked to. Nice try, but unfortunately you cannot whitewash the furry fandom. I suggest you stop reverting every single edit that could possible be intrepreted negatively on the furry fandom article. 68.69.194.125 04:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)