Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:49, 24 May 2014

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Canada: British Columbia Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Sources

This article smells like bullshit to me. I've lived in the Portland area for twenty years and I have never once heard this used. Can anyone find a citation for its "general use"? unless (talk) 08:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Purely anecdotal, but growing up in the Puget Sound region, I knew older folks who used this to mean "securely attached" or "well fitted". I suspect it was once in more general usage throughout the PNW. A google search suggests it might still be in active use in BC. walkie (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Growing up in BC, I heard this word used quite a bit, never in Vancouver, but among blue-collar forestry-types. My dad or grampa would typically use it to mean neat, useful or powerful, especially in relation to size, as in "I just got a Skookum little electric fishing motor for my boat. It's quiet but it really goes. Vroom-vroom." (Vroom is also a pacific-northwest word-- used to evoke the noise made by a motor or engine.)Stevecudmore (talk) 16:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

I am unlikely to have time to work on this page much, but here's a few of possibly useful sources, I think all reliable:

• Eric Partridge (2006). The new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional English: J-Z. Taylor & Francis. p. 1768. ISBN 978-0-415-25938-5. Retrieved 27 March 2013. (says the term is still in active use in BC)
• Allan A. Metcalf (2000). How We Talk: American Regional English Today. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 146. ISBN 978-0-618-04362-0. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
• William Bright (2004). Native American Placenames of the United States. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 452. ISBN 978-0-8061-3598-4. Retrieved 27 March 2013.

Although I'm probably not going to work on the page anytime soon I'm going to remove the PROD deletion tag. Pfly (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

How exactly do these sources allow us to write more than a dictionary definition? I don't see it. Huon (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your inline edit comment "how can a tool manufacturer be a valid cite for linguistics" sums up how off-base the opposition to this article and the Tools cite is out of touch with this word being a cultural phenomenon; this isn't a linguistics article. The article is about a popular word and its varying meanings, including the usage for a sasquatch-like beasty and the widely-marketed Skookum Doll and it's the basis for the word Skookumchuck......which is also not a linguistics article but about a thing. This article, too, involves things (the monster, the dolls) and so the word has to be defined/explained. The point with the tools cite is it's not a cite from a book about native culture/language, this is a word that's current in non-native life and has a history and identification wth this region; your attempt to get it deleted was way out of line.Skookum1 (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Don't edit war over nominations for speedy deletion. — kwami (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• Start-Class Canada-related articles
• Low-importance Canada-related articles
• Start-Class British Columbia articles
• Low-importance British Columbia articles
• All WikiProject Canada pages