| Revision as of 06:24, 30 May 2014 editStimpy3 (talk | contribs)4 edits →Blocked one week: blocked as recently as 2011← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:29, 30 May 2014 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,335 edits →Blocked one week: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| *Happy to help. Quackguru about , where he apparently changed a claim from a source about 15% into "a third". Rather than discuss this "mistake" productively the user chose to repeatedly the conversation from his user talk page. As I said when I went into this area, I have little time for tendentious editing, and as the user has a block log the length of my arm, and would not engage, I have blocked them one week. If anything I think this was a lenient block, and I only made it such a light one because their last block was in 2009. active block notices is not allowed so the user then lost talk page access. ] seems to be against the edits as well. I stand utterly by my actions in this area. --] (]) 05:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC) | *Happy to help. Quackguru about , where he apparently changed a claim from a source about 15% into "a third". Rather than discuss this "mistake" productively the user chose to repeatedly the conversation from his user talk page. As I said when I went into this area, I have little time for tendentious editing, and as the user has a block log the length of my arm, and would not engage, I have blocked them one week. If anything I think this was a lenient block, and I only made it such a light one because their last block was in 2009. active block notices is not allowed so the user then lost talk page access. ] seems to be against the edits as well. I stand utterly by my actions in this area. --] (]) 05:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::In fact, QuackGuru was blocked as recently as 2011, per . He was notified at his talk page . For some reason this 2011 block does not seem to be registered on QuackGurus block log. ] (]) 06:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC) | ::In fact, QuackGuru was blocked as recently as 2011, per . He was notified at his talk page . For some reason this 2011 block does not seem to be registered on QuackGurus block log. ] (]) 06:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::: QG is indeed an active medical editor, but also one of the most controversial, to the point where I often stay away from articles he edits, which are often my favorite topics, the ones in which I'm a recognized expert in the real world. It's simply impossible to communicate effectively with him. He has a ''de facto'' IDHT, very tendentious, form of communication, and merely repeats claims and his own ideas, without addressing the concerns brought up by other editors. That he is usually defending and promoting a scientific skepticism POV (which is usually the same as the mainstream scientific and medical POV) is fine, but collaboration is essential, and his communication needs to be vastly improved. He only gets truly communicative when he's being threatened with a block, and then he suddenly will bend and bow and cooperate to the nth degree, but that stops when he's back into safe territory. When such an editor keeps me from editing my favorite topics, then you know something's really wrong. He gives skeptics a bad name. He has also been known to go on rampages through articles, doing exactly the opposite of what he usually does, supporting fringe POV and destroying mainstream content, the type he usually adds to articles. It's been a while since he did this, but it's been known to happen, making one wonder what type of mind we're dealing with. Misplaced Pages would be better off without him. A thorough CU would bring to light some astounding things. -- ] (]) 06:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:29, 30 May 2014
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QuackGuru. |
Welcome!
Hello, QuackGuru, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:32, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
An award for you!
The WikiProject Medicine QuackStar
Quack!
Quack!
 For your useful spot here, which led to a successful SPI, I award you the WikiProject Medicine QuackStar.
|
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| For putting up with baseless attacks against you. Briefly looked at the "evidence" of poor editing by you and didn't find any Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 12:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
And another
|
The Steady Rate Barnstar | |
| Tick tock, Tick Tock! All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 02:08, 6 April 2014 (UTC). |
Thank you for being one of Misplaced Pages's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into the local language
|
The Cure Award |
| In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Misplaced Pages. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! |
We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)
Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation
Blocked one week
Hi there Quackguru. I have blocked your account for one week for disruptive editing. Your edits to electronic cigarette are either riddled with error or too one-sided. When you come back I want you to take a lot more care, consider avoiding areas where you have very strong views, and (especially) remember that editing here is a collaborative process (meaning we have to work together) and a privilege (which can be withdrawn). If you wish to appeal against this block you may do so by posting {{unblock|your reason here}}, but you should review WP:GAB first. Best wishes and good luck. --John (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Interesting. Diffs please. You have also set it so he cannot edit his talk page. How is he to appeal this again? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Doc James, in my experience it's fairly common to remove talk page access when a blocked user removes the block notice as in ~Adjwilley (talk) 00:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Can anybody point me to any evidence of disruptive editing? -Roxy the dog (resonate) 23:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- Interesting. Diffs please. You have also set it so he cannot edit his talk page. How is he to appeal this again? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 22:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
John, please provide evidence for "disruptive editing", because I want to see it. QuackGuru is among the most competent editors of medical articles on Misplaced Pages. Also, I've checked his recent edita, and they seem to strictly abide by Misplaced Pages's guidelines. I think your block is completely uncalled for. -Fasf14 (talk) 23:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
- People who are truly the most competent do not normally rack up a block log with more than a dozen entries and a couple of RFC/U discussions (1, 2). Disruption involves how you interact with other editors (social skills), not just about whether or not you promote a scientific POV. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- One of the RfC U has no difs supporting it. And when asked none were ever provided. It was an interesting case.
- Anyway will give the admin in question a little more time and than bring to ANI. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- Happy to help. Quackguru was asked about this edit, where he apparently changed a claim from a source about 15% into "a third". Rather than discuss this "mistake" productively the user chose to repeatedly remove the conversation from his user talk page. As I said when I went into this area, I have little time for tendentious editing, and as the user has a block log the length of my arm, and would not engage, I have blocked them one week. If anything I think this was a lenient block, and I only made it such a light one because their last block was in 2009. Removing active block notices is not allowed so the user then lost talk page access. Consensus at the article talk page seems to be against the edits as well. I stand utterly by my actions in this area. --John (talk) 05:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- In fact, QuackGuru was blocked as recently as 2011, per this AE thread. He was notified at his talk page here. For some reason this 2011 block does not seem to be registered on QuackGurus block log. Stimpy3 (talk) 06:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- QG is indeed an active medical editor, but also one of the most controversial, to the point where I often stay away from articles he edits, which are often my favorite topics, the ones in which I'm a recognized expert in the real world. It's simply impossible to communicate effectively with him. He has a de facto IDHT, very tendentious, form of communication, and merely repeats claims and his own ideas, without addressing the concerns brought up by other editors. That he is usually defending and promoting a scientific skepticism POV (which is usually the same as the mainstream scientific and medical POV) is fine, but collaboration is essential, and his communication needs to be vastly improved. He only gets truly communicative when he's being threatened with a block, and then he suddenly will bend and bow and cooperate to the nth degree, but that stops when he's back into safe territory. When such an editor keeps me from editing my favorite topics, then you know something's really wrong. He gives skeptics a bad name. He has also been known to go on rampages through articles, doing exactly the opposite of what he usually does, supporting fringe POV and destroying mainstream content, the type he usually adds to articles. It's been a while since he did this, but it's been known to happen, making one wonder what type of mind we're dealing with. Misplaced Pages would be better off without him. A thorough CU would bring to light some astounding things. -- Brangifer (talk) 06:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
- In fact, QuackGuru was blocked as recently as 2011, per this AE thread. He was notified at his talk page here. For some reason this 2011 block does not seem to be registered on QuackGurus block log. Stimpy3 (talk) 06:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)