| Revision as of 17:22, 7 June 2014 editSuperfast1111 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,339 edits →Moving junction stations← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:25, 7 June 2014 edit undoLeoFrank (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,830 edits →Rollback abuse: addNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| Yes,it is confusing but in the absence of a clear guidelines/instructions, i would hold off on moving pages. By the way, you need to reverse ] as Indian railway website & station-boards show Mathura Junction. | Yes,it is confusing but in the absence of a clear guidelines/instructions, i would hold off on moving pages. By the way, you need to reverse ] as Indian railway website & station-boards show Mathura Junction. | ||
| ] (]) 17:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | ] (]) 17:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Rollback abuse == | |||
| is abuse of rollback rights. Please go through ]. Rollback is supposed to be used only for reverting clear cut vandalism and not for content disputes. | |||
| Also, deleting comments from your talk page is not a good practice, it is always visible in the history. It is best to archive your talk page. See for more. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 17:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :To add, is inappropriate. The editor was in no way vandalizing the page. Read ]. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—] <sup>]</sup></span> 17:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:25, 7 June 2014
Edit Buddy
|
Hi Vinod/Vinay (that's what I took vin09) I recently started editing pages related to Vijayawada. Got you on Edit History
Need help!! If you are from Vijayawada. Let's add few more pages. Mamidivivek (talk) 13:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your efforts to improve the article Andhra Pradesh and it's associated ones! Greatly appreciated! Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 11:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC) |
Barnstar!
|
Solarra's Guestbook Barnstar | ||
| This user has signed my guestbook and been presented with a barnstar. Sign my guestbook now if you have not yet! | ♥ Solarra ♥ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ |
Moving junction stations
Dear @Vin09, recently i see to that you have moved a lot of junction station articles from "XXXXX Junction railway station" to "XXXXX railway station". Could u please guide me in which naming convention at wiki and where there exists such rule/guideline for initiating such moves? --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 15:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Actually I saw this page which may be a UK guide and even asked a master editor USer:Strike Eagle, after some discussion he guided me about how to write names, but its not my intention to spoil those pages, I just want name all of them uniquely as other stations like Nagpur which is a junction is named as just a railway station but all others differently. Sorry, if I was wrong. If you know better please guide me about railway stations, divisions names.--Vin09 (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Noted your move on Delhi Junction railway station. At times, i do agree it is confusing when the Indian Railway website just mentions the name but the evidence at the railway station noted xxxx Junction. How about a discussion on the concerned talk page prior making such moves?? Superfast1111 (talk) 16:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, just now I saw your discussion at this page. You had similar discussion. I too was very much confused about it.--Vin09 (talk) 16:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes I do accept it was a hurry move I feel sorry for that. If you guide me I will definitely contribute and such things will not be repeated.--Vin09 (talk) 16:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Yes,it is confusing but in the absence of a clear guidelines/instructions, i would hold off on moving pages. By the way, you need to reverse Mathura Junction railway station as Indian railway website & station-boards show Mathura Junction. Superfast1111 (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Rollback abuse
This is abuse of rollback rights. Please go through WP:ROLLBACK. Rollback is supposed to be used only for reverting clear cut vandalism and not for content disputes. Also, deleting comments from your talk page is not a good practice, it is always visible in the history. It is best to archive your talk page. See here for more. — LeoFrank 17:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- To add, this warning is inappropriate. The editor was in no way vandalizing the page. Read WP:NOTVAND. — LeoFrank 17:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)