Revision as of 20:45, 11 June 2014 editArianewiki1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,591 edits Please leave this page intact. I assume you are doing the to stop 3RRR edit war you are engaged in. Editors please review history..← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:48, 11 June 2014 edit undo217.208.57.69 (talk) Atainewiki1 - go sod yourselfNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Talk pages == | |||
Please do not delete threads from talk pages. They will be archived at an appropriate time if necessary. ] (]) 22:17, 8 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Note: The talk page is being used as a forum - in spite of clearly posted policy warnings. It may be a good time for archiving.] (]) 17:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
== The topic of ] is covered by an ] case == | |||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ] and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 22:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Consider this a final warning == | |||
Edit the ] article again in the manner you have done here and your violations of multiple Misplaced Pages policies in regard to an article under Arbcom sanctions will be reported. ] (]) 14:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
The article was reverted to it's original version, which was also policy compliant, as well as neutral, in contrast with the latest version, which (even if policy compliant) is not neutral. The motive for the A priori revert was constructive, rather than distructive or disruptive.] (]) 16:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
:If you want a one-on-one struggle with ] you are probably overmatched. They have the authority to impose binding solutions on regular editors. It is best if you will make your case on talk pages and try to persuade others to support you. ] (]) 17:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you Ed. Hopefully that case has already been made, it's up to other editors to come to a rational conclusion. Although ] have administrative control over content on the WP server. Authority over individuals is something they (or anyone) absolutely does not have.] (]) 17:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::I 110% agree with the deletion of this page. The severe modification made by ] is biassed, unbalanced, and most rejected / untrue. The version of the original is a much better perspective. Much of the information is speculative, and it is clear from the ] page you either haven't listen to other editors or don't care. | |||
:::Just to be clear to you, the following I said on the ] | |||
::::"...plasma cosmology relies on the universe being infinitely old and infinite in size, rejects basic physics like redshifts, and assumes magnetic fields far greater than can be observed. Field strength, say for the Milky Way are measured less than microgauss, where for plasma cosmology to be correct needs thousands of gauss. Worst still, you cannot even properly account for fusion reactions in stars, nor for the chemical evolution of stars and galaxies. I've even seen truly crazy things like using H-R diagrams to explain 'alternative' versions of stellar evolution, including stars evolving from red giants to blue stars! Even the Cosmic Background radiation cannot be properly explained by plasma cosmology, without rejecting whole swathes of quite basic physics. Black holes, neutron stars and white dwarfs are also based on firmly established physics, like Relativity and quantum mechanics, yet these are rejected too. There are so many pillars that have to be broken, that even those with rudimentary knowledge of science, knows plasma cosmology or its offshoots, has the probability of zero to be right." | |||
:::Again you ignore the facts, and present information that is both destructive or disruptive to constructive article building. You lastest effort is plainly biassed and from only one point of view. You also said; ""I personally will not post any more sources in Misplaced Pages again.", so why did you return? Did you think we'd not notice? | |||
::::So any future action by you are clear. Play nicely, or don't play at all. ] (]) 18:59, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
==Edit Warring== | |||
::::You have already been caught out for Edit warring. I.e. | |||
Please read ] as you are edit warring on ]. You need to work for consensus on the article talk page rather than edit warring. ] (]) 16:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for ], as you did at ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. ] (]) 21:01, 6 June 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> | |||
You removed this from your User page. Further behaviour, like the stunt to remove most of the current article, will result in repeat action, with likely even more strict sanctions. ] (]) 19:10, 11 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Arianewiki1 - please feel free to go climb a rope* | Arianewiki1 - please feel free to go climb a rope* | ||
Sorry. You forgot to sign your user with four tildes. Please do not remove your talk page discussion as no one can follow the developments of articles.] (]) 20:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:48, 11 June 2014
Arianewiki1 - please feel free to go climb a rope*