| Revision as of 03:08, 12 June 2014 edit182.249.240.34 (talk) →POV?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:11, 12 June 2014 edit undoCatflap08 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,144 edits →POV?Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] (]) 03:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | ] (]) 03:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :So lets see Jacqueline I. Stone, Tanaka Chigaku himself and the website are unreliable sources then? And the fact that I created this article, an article you would probably not like to see to appear at all are problematic to you? This by somebody who refrains to use his original username --- looking at the history, no wonder. Wonder who has a POV issue now. --] (]) 11:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 12 June 2014
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kokuchūkai article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
POV?
This article discusses a contemporary religious group exclusively in political terms. It cites two sources, one of which was written by the group's founder in the 1930s, and the other of which is a historical work exclusively dealing with the antebellum history of the group. The article is also written exclusively by an editor with a history of misrepresenting/misinterpreting sources to make broad claims that aren't actually supported by said sources.
I don't know enough about the current ideology of the group to say whether the information regarding the pre-WWII group is still accurate for today, but the article currently fails to convince me.
(For the record, I'm the same person as on the Kenji page, now editing from a phone.)
182.249.240.34 (talk) 03:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- So lets see Jacqueline I. Stone, Tanaka Chigaku himself and the website are unreliable sources then? And the fact that I created this article, an article you would probably not like to see to appear at all are problematic to you? This by somebody who refrains to use his original username --- looking at the history, no wonder. Wonder who has a POV issue now. --Catflap08 (talk) 11:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)