| Revision as of 02:53, 18 June 2014 edit187.17.52.174 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:13, 18 June 2014 edit undoTimeshift9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers67,126 edits →KeatingNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ::::::Was that not the premise of your previous comment? ] (]) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ::::::Was that not the premise of your previous comment? ] (]) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::No. ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | :::::::No. ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| {{3RR}} | |||
Revision as of 03:13, 18 June 2014
Keating
See WP:BRD. Your change is disputed so it is now incumbent upon you to get a consensus on the article's talk page. Timeshift (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think you have mistaken an essay for a policy. It's first of all incumbent on you to explain why you dispute the edit. You do not have the right to simply revert edits because you don't like them. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps you'd like to utilize the talkpage? Or not. Timeshift (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. But if you are the kind of person who thinks "disagree" is an adequate edit summary for a revert then it seems unlikely that you'll be much use in a discussion. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since when is a talkpage discussion about just two editors? Timeshift (talk) 02:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Who said it was? 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Was that not the premise of your previous comment? Timeshift (talk) 02:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Who said it was? 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Since when is a talkpage discussion about just two editors? Timeshift (talk) 02:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Sure. But if you are the kind of person who thinks "disagree" is an adequate edit summary for a revert then it seems unlikely that you'll be much use in a discussion. 187.17.52.174 (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps you'd like to utilize the talkpage? Or not. Timeshift (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.