Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Chinawhite (nightclub): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:09, 3 July 2014 editGiantSnowman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators603,247 edits withdrawn← Previous edit Revision as of 08:01, 3 July 2014 edit undoDr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors636,351 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
*'''Speedy keep''' This nom is a prime example of the "stubborn editor" point of my ]. Seriously, this is one of the most notable nightclubs in London, a global city and has been cited as "London's most elite nightclub". Easily passes GNG. Plenty of coverage in London guides and newspapers. Over 500 hits in Highbeam research, plenty of coverage in non tabloid papers like , (which cites it as a high-profile London club), , , , etc. even has a chapter on the VIP area of Chinawhite. Not to mention book sources like , and which document a legal dispute it was involved with.♦ ] 21:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC) *'''Speedy keep''' This nom is a prime example of the "stubborn editor" point of my ]. Seriously, this is one of the most notable nightclubs in London, a global city and has been cited as "London's most elite nightclub". Easily passes GNG. Plenty of coverage in London guides and newspapers. Over 500 hits in Highbeam research, plenty of coverage in non tabloid papers like , (which cites it as a high-profile London club), , , , etc. even has a chapter on the VIP area of Chinawhite. Not to mention book sources like , and which document a legal dispute it was involved with.♦ ] 21:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
:*{{ping|Dr. Blofeld}} Not everyone has full access to Highbeam, and some of those sources don't mention the club from the bits I have 'free' access to...perhaps if you AGFed a bit more (and actually explained re:notability at your talk page rather than simply blanking my posts) then this nomination would not have been required? ]] 07:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC) :*{{ping|Dr. Blofeld}} Not everyone has full access to Highbeam, and some of those sources don't mention the club from the bits I have 'free' access to...perhaps if you AGFed a bit more (and actually explained re:notability at your talk page rather than simply blanking my posts) then this nomination would not have been required? ]] 07:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
{{ping|GiantSnowman}} I stopped assuming good faith the moment you nominated an article with ''fifteen'' sources for deletion.♦ ] 08:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 08:01, 3 July 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. GiantSnowman 07:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Chinawhite (nightclub)

Chinawhite (nightclub) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources as required by WP:GNG. A few passing mentions in tour guides etc. (because it is a 'cool' place) and a few passing mentions in tabloids etc. (because 'cool' famous people go there) is not sufficient. GiantSnowman 21:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

  • @Dr. Blofeld: Not everyone has full access to Highbeam, and some of those sources don't mention the club from the bits I have 'free' access to...perhaps if you AGFed a bit more (and actually explained re:notability at your talk page rather than simply blanking my posts) then this nomination would not have been required? GiantSnowman 07:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman: I stopped assuming good faith the moment you nominated an article with fifteen sources for deletion.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chinawhite (nightclub): Difference between revisions Add topic