| Revision as of 18:35, 3 October 2008 editEnigmaman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers41,744 edits →User:CorticoSpinal: archive← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:51, 27 July 2014 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,514 edits adding NeuraxisNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| <!-- DO NOT EDIT THE "----" NOR THE </div> KEEP THEM WHERE THEY ARE. REMEMBER TO SIGN! USING FOUR TILDES --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT THE "----" NOR THE </div> KEEP THEM WHERE THEY ARE. REMEMBER TO SIGN! USING FOUR TILDES --> | ||
| == Addition of Neuraxis == | |||
| Since this is stale, I'm not opening a new case, but it needs to be registered here. | |||
| {{userlinks|Neuraxis}} appears to be a sock of CorticoSpinal. Take a look at the edit summaries for both accounts! This has DUCK written all over it in all caps. This is on top of the already established identical location, plus all the identical professions, interests, editing habits, and behavioral issues which got both of them indef blocked. -- ] (]) 01:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:51, 27 July 2014
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:CorticoSpinal
- Suspected sock puppeteer
CorticoSpinal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Suspected sock puppets
- Soyuz113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 208.101.118.33 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Marcbronson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- EBDCM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- ShirleyTO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 64.25.184.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 99.229.74.64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 208.101.89.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 208.101.95.220 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- 208.101.118.196 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)
- Report submission by
- Evidence
- This case revolves around a persistent POV-pusher and disruptive editor problem on Chiropractic and related pages and talk pages.
- CorticoSpinal (talk · contribs) was blocked for activities related to Chiropractic. See block log.
- EBDCM (talk · contribs) redirects to CorticoSpinal, so I believe that sock is obvious.
- Soyuz113 (talk · contribs) and 208.101.118.33 (talk · contribs) have edited Chiropractic in a disruptive manner such as POV edits, removal of consensus material, POV edits, and talk page discussions all similar to the activities and editing of CorticoSpinal.
- Signs one of his IP edits
- Forgot to sign in while evading a block using the same IP.est.
- AGK's post to Soyuz113's page.
- Both CorticoSpinal and Soyuz113 have used the word spam in an edit summary when deleting talk page text.
- Comments
- The socks of CorticoSpinal, who is indefinitely blocked, should also be blocked immediately.
- EBDCM was CorticoSpinal's original username, this account was renamed and redirected so is not a sock. However, I find it very suspicious that the "new" editor Soyuz113 should designate their second edit as minor, diff. This certainly looks like a sock to me. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't know this. My recollection was that one or the other were caught being socks, and someone created the redirect. In either case, shouldn't someone put something up to that effect? OrangeMarlin 21:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have explained the history of all this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/CorticoSpinal -- Fyslee / talk 06:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
- I didn't know this. My recollection was that one or the other were caught being socks, and someone created the redirect. In either case, shouldn't someone put something up to that effect? OrangeMarlin 21:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- EBDCM was CorticoSpinal's original username, this account was renamed and redirected so is not a sock. However, I find it very suspicious that the "new" editor Soyuz113 should designate their second edit as minor, diff. This certainly looks like a sock to me. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Soyuz113 and associated IP blocked. I have anon-blocked the IP at the top of this report and indefinitely blocked Soyuz113. This is a fairly clear case of block evasion and sockpuppetry. Any further incidents should result in a community ban proposal. Both accounts edit the same topics, sharing the exact same view, pushing the same type of content changes, with the same attitude and approach, and even edit from the same IP. (For example, both users made it clear they wish to include material indicating the effectiveness of manual manipulation for neck issues, have spinal manipulation information removed from the chiropractic article, and sharply reduce the amount of information about a portion of chiropractors opposing vaccination.) Soyuz113 started off using full edit summaries and diving immediately into the altmed controversy with a principal focus on chiropractic. The account is at best used as a "bad hand" account or is a proxy for blocked users (meatpuppet). User blocked and notified. Vassyana (talk) 06:10, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Addition of Neuraxis
Since this is stale, I'm not opening a new case, but it needs to be registered here. Neuraxis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) appears to be a sock of CorticoSpinal. Take a look at the edit summaries for both accounts! This has DUCK written all over it in all caps. This is on top of the already established identical location, plus all the identical professions, interests, editing habits, and behavioral issues which got both of them indef blocked. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)