Revision as of 16:00, 7 August 2014 editDavey2010 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers142,543 edits →Relsit note: Pinged / reworded← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:18, 7 August 2014 edit undoDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits →Relsit note: reNext edit → | ||
Line 991: | Line 991: | ||
: Thanks for the barnstar :) - I didn't see much point in readding it back but knew shit would hit the fan so thought to keep everyone sweet why not lol, Anyway thanks :), Have a nice day, –] • ] 11:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | : Thanks for the barnstar :) - I didn't see much point in readding it back but knew shit would hit the fan so thought to keep everyone sweet why not lol, Anyway thanks :), Have a nice day, –] • ] 11:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
== |
== Relist note == | ||
About your relist note at ]. First, you could have and should have addressed my Procedural note. As you left the discussion, it was in limbo still. Second, your statement "Object/Oppose" means absolutely nothing" is incorrect. Of course these words are an unambiguous, clear and meaningful ''reply'' to an XfD proposal. There is no reason to dismiss such arguments. You might be confusing this with the possible ''outcome'', which is a ] set. -] (]) 15:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | About your relist note at ]. First, you could have and should have addressed my Procedural note. As you left the discussion, it was in limbo still. Second, your statement "Object/Oppose" means absolutely nothing" is incorrect. Of course these words are an unambiguous, clear and meaningful ''reply'' to an XfD proposal. There is no reason to dismiss such arguments. You might be confusing this with the possible ''outcome'', which is a ] set. -] (]) 15:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
Line 1,000: | Line 1,000: | ||
:Anyway I don't mean to sound like a dick but I'm not a mind reader sadly - Wish I was tho {{p|grin}}, | :Anyway I don't mean to sound like a dick but I'm not a mind reader sadly - Wish I was tho {{p|grin}}, | ||
:Anyway Thanks for your message, Regards –] • ] 15:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | :Anyway Thanks for your message, Regards –] • ] 15:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Did you explain why you did not react to the "procedural" post (which is quite crucial in that)? Don't get it. | |||
::Why would an "Oppose" or "Object" (in bold & with bullet) be read against anything else than the nomination? And even then, an admin is not supposed to do vote counting, but actually ''read and digest'' the arguments provided. So any argument reading would eliminate any unclarity you might have. No need to read minds, not even you own. -] (]) 16:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:18, 7 August 2014
Since I'm relatively new to closing AFD's & relisting - If you feel I've made an error & want it relisting please let me know, Cheers, |
WP:RETENTION: This editor is willing to lend a helping hand. Just ask.
This user has opted out of talkbacks
Archives |
• 2010 |
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ |
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
New to Wiki editing and my edits are no longer there?
AmeliaLOnline The older picture on the Amelia Lily page is from 2012, it is NOT up to date. Please stop referring back to it and I also added new text updates which you have deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AmeliaLOnline (talk • contribs) 19:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya AmeliaLOnline, Sorry I'd hit the wrong button - Wasn't supposed to of reverted,
- It doesn't matter whether the imageis outdated or not, You can't just upload off of the internet,
- Thanks,
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
User talk:AmeliaLilyOnline
You do realize, Davey, that you are edit warring as well. Please be careful. It's not worth risking sanctions over this.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya Bbb23, In my defence I did reply to her above as well as start a new discussion, Edit warring is the biggest problem I have here, and believe it or not I am trying very hard to overcome it by starting these discussions although they're soewhat late!, But anyway thanks for the friendly note - Much appreciated,
- Have a nice day,
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- For the present, she's been indefinitely blocked because of her username. Take care.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- "Saved by the bell" quite literally!, Anyway thanks, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:59, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- For the present, she's been indefinitely blocked because of her username. Take care.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
DOB
Hello Davey2010,
Please edit DOB to Danielle Harold and Hetti Bywater's page
Please add DOB to Anne Hegerty's page (DOB was there before)
Hetti Bywater's DOB was correct before (10 September 1994)
Ok?
Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathangrehan (talk • contribs) 18:58, 29 June 2014
- You're adding unsourced content .... You can't just change the DOB of everyone without a valid reason and source ...–Davey2010 • (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Donghua Liu
Hi there. I'm not sure why you felt the need to relist the discussion above; with ten !votes to delete and only one dissenting opinion, I would say that it's fairly clearly a consensus to delete. If there are some circumstances that make you feel this is unusual and warrants relisting despite the extensive participation, it might help editors if you noted that in the discussion. Lankiveil 08:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC).
- Lankiveil - Fucksake apologies for that, It being 8:30am and only having 3 hours sleep I clearly wasn't all with it!, Anyway I absolutely agree there wasn't any need to relist it, Cheers for the heads up there, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- No problems, I was just more worried there was something very obvious that I'd missed. Happy to let another admin come and sort it out, then =). Lankiveil 10:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC).
- Haha nope you haven't missed anything :), Happy Editing, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:20, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2014
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 7, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2014
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2014, the project has:
|
Content
|
Project Navigation
-
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
relist guidance
I noticed one "third relisting" in a recent AFD from you, and it's not a huge deal, but I did want you to point you at WP:RELIST, which recommends against any more than two relists oustide of exceptional circumstances. Depending on a variety of specifics, we'll often close those with a result, with no consensus, or with WP:SOFTDELETE instead. Thanks for your help! --j⚛e decker 21:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya, Ah for some unknown reason I had it in my head 3 was the maximum .... Anyway thanks for the message,
- Have a nice day,
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. By the way, in an apparent edit conflict I closed something you'd already closed--I've fixed it, but my apologies if that caused any confusion or concern. Cheers, --j⚛e decker 18:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya, I never even realized till like 10mins later when you reverted lol, Anyway no worries :) Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:51, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- No worries. By the way, in an apparent edit conflict I closed something you'd already closed--I've fixed it, but my apologies if that caused any confusion or concern. Cheers, --j⚛e decker 18:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Saint Philomena's National School, Ravenswell
Hi Davey: You added an incorrect link at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Saint Philomena's National School, Ravenswell for a redirect target to Brya (a genus of flowering plants) for a primary school article. Just a heads up. Cheers, NorthAmerica 00:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ah typo, That's what I get for typing fast lol, Cheers for the heads up, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yep. Thanks for contributing to AfD. NorthAmerica 02:01, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Nac
Hi Davey: When closing AfD discussions as keep, don't forget to remove the AfD template from the article. Per your close at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Moggs, I removed the AfD template from the top of The Moggs (diff). For a complete overview of procedures, check out the afd close instructions. Thanks, NorthAmerica 01:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya Northamerica1000, Ah I use a tool to close them and the tool should've also removed the notice but seems it failed there, I'll have to double check from now on, Thanks for the heads up much appreciated, Regards –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I use User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD sometimes, and have had this occur. When it does, it could be due to Misplaced Pages server traffic delays, internet connection delays, etc., so I check afterwards. Cheers, NorthAmerica 13:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ahhh I just assumed it was a one off, Anyway thanks for letting me know, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I use User:Mr.Z-man/closeAFD sometimes, and have had this occur. When it does, it could be due to Misplaced Pages server traffic delays, internet connection delays, etc., so I check afterwards. Cheers, NorthAmerica 13:14, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:High traffic
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:High traffic. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
AFD close
You closed WP:Articles for deletion/Scary Movie 6(Flim) as keep, even though the article was speedily deleted. Can I say "huh???"? WikiDan61ReadMe!! 15:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- I couldn't be bothered to find an afd temp so simply closed using the tool and amended soon after. Check now :) –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Your closure of AfD:Paras Hospitals
Hello! Thanks for doing non-admin closures in an area that needs help. But if you'll pardon my saying so, I think your closure of the AfD for Paras Hospitals was inappropriate. And I say that even though you closed it as "keep" and I was one of the "keep" votes. Non-admin closures are supposed to be used only in cases where the decision is obvious. But in this case there were two "delete" !votes - the nominator's and one other, better framed argument - and two "keep" !votes, mine and one with no valid reason given. So not really a good case for a NAC, or possibly for an admin close either; could have been relisted. In addition to the NAC issue, I think your action here was more of a supervote; you believed the hospitals to be notable, and you have done some commendable work at the article to improve it; but in that case the appropriate action would be to post a "keep" vote and leave it to someone else to close. Just MHO. --MelanieN (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- I don't believe hospitals are notable, Anyway I've decided on reverting and relisting as to be honest looking at it It could've done with staying open so granted :)
- To be fair there has been alot of times where I've left alot of AFD's as they do require admins, As I'm new to this I'm bound to mess up but we all learn from our mistakes,
- Thanks for letting me know - Much appreciated,
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your flexibility. I see that I misread your feeling about the hospital, sorry. --MelanieN (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome, No worries :), Have a nice day, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Just for your reference (and because I realize that you are doing AfDs partly for the experience and the learning process): The outcome after relisting was "delete". Some outcomes are not as obvious as they might appear on first glance. (I was a "keep" !vote but I was outvoted in this case.) Keep up the good work, I hope see you with an RfA one of these days. --MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- To be honest I was very surprised to see it being deleted, I'm just glad I relisted really, Thanks :), Who knows one day I may apply :) Thanks for your kind words, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Just for your reference (and because I realize that you are doing AfDs partly for the experience and the learning process): The outcome after relisting was "delete". Some outcomes are not as obvious as they might appear on first glance. (I was a "keep" !vote but I was outvoted in this case.) Keep up the good work, I hope see you with an RfA one of these days. --MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome, No worries :), Have a nice day, Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 16:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your flexibility. I see that I misread your feeling about the hospital, sorry. --MelanieN (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello there!
{{Wikiproject Notability Invite}}
I have noticed you participate in several AfD's and I think you would be a great help for this project. JayJay 17:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya JayJay, Thanks for the invitation - Added myself :), Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:46, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the thanks haha theworldgymnast1 (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Haha you're welcome :), I apologize for the revert tho, –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2014 Spring, Texas shooting
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2014 Spring, Texas shooting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Gertrude Weaver
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gertrude Weaver. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Teri Takai deletion review
Well I cannot seem to find the deletion review. Also missing if a consensus was reached. I see 2 comments to keep. Only 1 really focused on content and rebutted, did no offer substance to my original thesis that being a CIO doesn't not automatically mean you're notable.--0pen$0urce (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- It was a clear keep, I appreciate you may have an issue with that but it happens with everyone here, Simply forget about it and move on,
- Happy Editing, –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Appreciate the near instant reply, what was the basis for keeping? 2 replies, 1 being the original author, thats a consensus? Really?!?! Sorry but I don't concur, and wouldn't nominate unless I thought I had some merit to do such. Lets exercise some adminship with prudence and restraint. Seems a tad swift of an action and then essentially told to run along.--0pen$0urce (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- The basis was the additional sources as well as the arguments for keeping, How ever you look at it there was no consesus to delete, One slight observation - I'm not an admit ... yet :),
- I said forgot about it and move on because it's not a big deal and you could be making great improvements here instead of being somewhat unhappy with the closure that's all, –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not unhappy, I was under the assumption admins had to close a NFD discussion, well this will be going to a Deletion review, feel free to conribute to that. Position doesn't constituite notability per wikipedia, no previous DOD CIO have articles, coverage is generic at best, most cases regurgitation from the primary source Thanks --0pen$0urce (talk) 22:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
- You could've just asked for a relist you know ? ... Well what's done is done. –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deletion review for Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Teri Takai
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Teri Takai. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 0pen$0urce (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Regarding your edit on St Thomas More RC Catholic upper school
Hi, In regards to your recent edit in which you reverted the change I made towards to the current head of St Thomas More, I believe you may have made a mistake: Joe Richardson has left as of the 18th July 2014 and has been replaced by Alison Wilshaw, I don't know whether you have affiliations with the school, but as I (and all other pupils at the school) have been notified, Alison Wilshaw is the new head as of September 2014. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleBarronTheScot (talk • contribs) 20:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya, Thanks for your edits, But you need to provide source (A news article, or even a message on schools website will do),
- I've removed the warning as seems unintentional
- Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Re-nom
Just found the link. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:18, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- I just added it and was met with an edit conflict - , Must be faster infuture haha. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
School AfDs
FYI. I really hate to be the one having to do this (I'm not that kind of admin), but some people are getting exasperated now and something needs to be done. If you have any thoughts on it let me know on my tp. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done :) –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Cory Gardner
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Cory Gardner. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The Janoskians
I beg your pardon. Earlier in the day there was a vandalism edit regarding Jai Brooks vs. Jay Brooks. I was attempting to revert that, but unfortunately I reverted the wrong version, and someone has already fixed the name. I did not mean to revert your edit. My apologies for my sloppy work! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ssilvers - Apology accepted and I apologize for the stupid edit summary, Other than a troll I've never had anyone call my edits vandalism so in the heat of the moment I got a bit pissed,
- Meh we all make mistakes so no worries :)
- Thank you for your apology - It actually does mean alot, And again I apologize for the edit summary,
- Have a nice day :)
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Harry J. Malony United States Army Reserve Center
I was wondering why you closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Harry J. Malony United States Army Reserve Center. The AFD discussion contained only one comment from an editor other than the article's creator and the editor who nominated it for deletion. There does not appear enough for a consensus either way. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 02:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Your reason for deletion was and I quote "Fails WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources", - Both Kevin and Hawkeye found alot of sources so notability was there and thus passed GNG perfectly fine, Feel free to go to DRV if you disagree. –- Scrap that - Sources don't look entirely great so relisting. Cheers, Davey2010 • (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
School AFDs
Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done
Re: Cheryl F-V
Why does she still professionally keep the surname of a cheating ex-husband who she had a turbulent marriage to? And all over the press now she is being referred to as Cheryl Fernandez-Versini: no mention of 'Cole' here. 80.111.184.146 (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Since we're not achieving anything other than edit warring I've opened a discussion here. –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Misplaced Pages better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Vauxhall bus station
For the record my posts to this article are not vandalism, I have explained the rationale for changes made, whether they are accepted is another issue, but I don't believe I have broken any rules in seeking to add to an article and discussing with those who have different opinions. Astbam (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- For the record Editing with an IP whilst using your account is something I nor the community like - See WP:SOCK,
- Me and another editor disagreed with your changes - You can keep adding it as much as you like but it's not going back in,
- At the end of the day you're becoming WP:DISRUPTIVE and are on very thin ice here, - If you wanna stay here alot longer than a week I suggest you stick to this account and to discuss your edits.
- Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:29, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Regional Radio Sports Network
I don't see any way to have closed this one either. I am going to ask that you re-open it and let an admin close it after this relist. John from Idegon (talk) 08:40, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: - After being up 3 weeks with 2 relists and 1 Keep with no Delete !votes - It's an obvious keep but as you asked nicely I'll happily relist it :),
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:59, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The nomination clearly should count as a delete, and after my comment the keep was only a weak keep. You are right it will probably end up as a No consensus, but there is not enough there to say it is a keep. Thanks I appreciate it. John from Idegon (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well ofcourse I disagree but relisted so harm done :), You're welcome and thanks for asking :), Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- The nomination clearly should count as a delete, and after my comment the keep was only a weak keep. You are right it will probably end up as a No consensus, but there is not enough there to say it is a keep. Thanks I appreciate it. John from Idegon (talk) 17:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Afd closure review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 2016 Formula One season. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Tvx1 (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject TAFI
Hello, Davey2010. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement. Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Nominated articles page. Also feel free to contribute to !voting for new weekly selections at the project's talk page. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. NorthAmerica 16:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
- Hiya, Thanks for the invite - Just joined :), –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for joining. Please note that if you'd like to receive weekly notices about new TAFI selections, just add your name to the project's Notifications list. NorthAmerica 02:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're very welcome :), Thank you for thinking of me , Will do cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for joining. Please note that if you'd like to receive weekly notices about new TAFI selections, just add your name to the project's Notifications list. NorthAmerica 02:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Reversion of edits to page Take That
Hi Davey,
On August 3rd you reverted my edits to the page Take That. Specifically, you removed a visual timeline I had created showing the members of the band over time. I find it hard to understand how making a visual timeline is now an example of unconstructive editing when such timelines are commonplace on many similar pages to Take That?
As far as I'm concerned, it's also rather demeaning for you to give me the whole 'Welcome to Misplaced Pages' standardised response that you posted on my talk page. I have been contributing consistently to Misplaced Pages for well over 2 years, during which time I have made thousands of constructive edits.
I hope we can talk this through in an adult fashion, --Jonie148 (talk) 08:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jonie,
- Nope I never reverted, Some IP reverted you and I simply gave you a warning, Robbies career is all mentioned above so I didn't see much point it being there, Usually they're added if new members come & go which other than Robbie none have,
- As for the warning I apologize for that I assumed you added it more than once as there was a chunk of crap added by an IP but you hadn't - I've removed the warning :)
- Thanks for your message,
- Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for explaining. :) I'll keep the graph on my user page in case it becomes useful in the future --Jonie148 (talk) 12:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome :) - Have a nice day :), Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 12:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Just noticed your handling of that user who kept posting a gallery on that AFD I thought you handled it exceptionally well. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 11:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the barnstar :) - I didn't see much point in readding it back but knew shit would hit the fan so thought to keep everyone sweet why not lol, Anyway thanks :), Have a nice day, –Davey2010 • (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Relist note
About your relist note at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Periodic table (large version). First, you could have and should have addressed my Procedural note. As you left the discussion, it was in limbo still. Second, your statement "Object/Oppose" means absolutely nothing" is incorrect. Of course these words are an unambiguous, clear and meaningful reply to an XfD proposal. There is no reason to dismiss such arguments. You might be confusing this with the possible outcome, which is a more limited set. -DePiep (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hiya DePiep - I did read your note and the comment wasn't aimed at you whatsoever,
- The "Object/Oppose" is incorrect - They could either be opposing the nominator (IE keep) or opposing to be kept,
- Usually Oppose/Object statements are occasionally dismissed as they're generally unclear,
- Anyway I don't mean to sound like a dick but I'm not a mind reader sadly - Wish I was tho ,
- Anyway Thanks for your message, Regards –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Did you explain why you did not react to the "procedural" post (which is quite crucial in that)? Don't get it.
- Why would an "Oppose" or "Object" (in bold & with bullet) be read against anything else than the nomination? And even then, an admin is not supposed to do vote counting, but actually read and digest the arguments provided. So any argument reading would eliminate any unclarity you might have. No need to read minds, not even you own. -DePiep (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2014 (UTC)