| Revision as of 00:14, 8 August 2014 editGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,069 edits Listing at WP:DELSORT under Authors (FWDS)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:04, 8 August 2014 edit undoNo such user (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,812 edits →Vanja BulićNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''' disruptive nomination. Homework: read the ] first, or just fucking type his name in Google. ] (]) 08:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:04, 8 August 2014
Vanja Bulić
AfDs for this article:- Vanja Bulić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
May not meet WP:AUTHOR. Although this author and film producer has produced works which have some coverage, may not meet WP:GNG, as most coverage appears to be on unreliable sources. Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:03, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Suspected bad faith nomination: the editor has just placed a comment on my shared ip page, from which this article was edited. the comment was about me supposedly "blanking" serbian film article, while i added pov tag (and a category). checking last nomination, which was relatively recent and retracted by nominator, testifies that motivation for this is not only bogus, but wastes community time. and yes, vanja bulic is a very well known journalist - just read last nomination. 213.198.221.171 (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- At the previous AfD nomination, the nominator did not give a good reason for it's deletion; he should have used WP policies and guidelines to support his claims. This is why that nomination was a bad faith nomination, but that does not make this one bad faith; I expressed a concern that this topic may not meet the notability guidelines listed above. As I've already told you, WP:NOTAGAIN is not a valid argument to use in deletion discussions.Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- the previous nomination does not seem to be bad faith nomination; the nominator was not knowledgeable about the subject, and it was poorly sourced. your nomination seems to be in bad faith, because of its motivation, as explained, and also because the previous nomination had a discussion that refuted all your supposed points. thus, i highly suspect that you did not nominate this because of your issue as you claim (though you put supposedly supportive policies), but because you checked what articles were edited from ip that edited page serbian film, that you claimed was "blanking". either that, or it is a weird coincidence. in any case, i believe this is bad faith nomination, which has nothing to do with the merits of the subject of the article (which is, as can be easily seen from discussion before, both notable, and satisfies all the criteria that you claim are basis for deletion - both author, and reliable sources etc; but that is no surprising, since your motivation is in something elese apparently). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.198.221.171 (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- At the previous AfD nomination, the nominator did not give a good reason for it's deletion; he should have used WP policies and guidelines to support his claims. This is why that nomination was a bad faith nomination, but that does not make this one bad faith; I expressed a concern that this topic may not meet the notability guidelines listed above. As I've already told you, WP:NOTAGAIN is not a valid argument to use in deletion discussions.Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:07, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Suspected bad faith nomination: the editor has just placed a comment on my shared ip page, from which this article was edited. the comment was about me supposedly "blanking" serbian film article, while i added pov tag (and a category). checking last nomination, which was relatively recent and retracted by nominator, testifies that motivation for this is not only bogus, but wastes community time. and yes, vanja bulic is a very well known journalist - just read last nomination. 213.198.221.171 (talk) 22:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep disruptive nomination. Homework: read the Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vanja Bulić first, or just fucking type his name in Google. No such user (talk) 08:04, 8 August 2014 (UTC)