User talk:Devagyarishi238: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:56, 11 August 2014 editNeilN (talk \| contribs)134,455 edits →August 2014 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:20, 11 August 2014 edit undoDevagyarishi238 (talk \| contribs)93 edits →August 2014 Next edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:
	:]its only Sitush who has problem with the edit but he is not able to justify his stand ,and regarding my own translation being used as someone else's i can easily change my interpretation to what is written in the book.Like you said i tried to reach a concensus ,i have given 10 sources to justify my stand but Sitush hasnt been able to give any source to his stand .		:]its only Sitush who has problem with the edit but he is not able to justify his stand ,and regarding my own translation being used as someone else's i can easily change my interpretation to what is written in the book.Like you said i tried to reach a concensus ,i have given 10 sources to justify my stand but Sitush hasnt been able to give any source to his stand .
	::There are two issues. One is what ] to give your sources. That can be hashed out on the talk page (and don't put a deadline of a couple hours for a response - a few days is reasonable). Second, and more disturbing, are your multiple attempts to pass off your own translation as someone else's despite being told not to. Putting a reference after the quoted translation implies the exact quote is found in the source. This is misleading at best and deliberate falsification at worst. You need to understand this. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)		::There are two issues. One is what ] to give your sources. That can be hashed out on the talk page (and don't put a deadline of a couple hours for a response - a few days is reasonable). Second, and more disturbing, are your multiple attempts to pass off your own translation as someone else's despite being told not to. Putting a reference after the quoted translation implies the exact quote is found in the source. This is misleading at best and deliberate falsification at worst. You need to understand this. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
			:::]I have removed your major concern over my translation with the exact quotes from the book ,now i dont think we should have a problem ] (]) 17:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

	] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)		] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you ], as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ] <sup>]</sup> 16:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:20, 11 August 2014

Welcome!

Hello, Devagyarishi238, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 15:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Parmanand Rishideo was accepted

Parmanand Rishideo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!

Fiddle Faddle 15:43, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Raniganj Araria (Vidhan Sabha constituency)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Raniganj Araria (Vidhan Sabha constituency), and it appears to be very similar to another Misplaced Pages page: Raniganj, Araria (Vidhan Sabha constituency). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Varna (Hinduism) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN 18:28, 9 August 2014 (UTC) Thank you NeilN

I am new to wiki, i didnt know about the rule .

Okay, please also see WP:BRD. You've opened a discussion (which is good!) so please participate in the discussion and see what others say (I've replied) before re-adding the content. Also, please sign your talk page posts by adding ~~~~ --NeilN 18:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Please note it's regarded as very bad form to substantially alter or add to your post after someone has replied to it. You should create a new post instead of modifying the old one. --NeilN 18:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Copied .Will keep that in mind Thnx Devagyarishi238 19:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Another tip - use : to indent your posts (I've fixed yours). If you edit this section you'll see what I mean. --NeilN 19:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

like this ?Devagyarishi238 (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

You got it! --NeilN 19:24, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks mate you have been very helpfulDevagyarishi238 (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Varna (Hinduism), you may be blocked from editing. You are attempting to pass off your own translation as someone else's despite being told not to. Perhaps this will get your attention. NeilN 16:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

NeilNits only Sitush who has problem with the edit but he is not able to justify his stand ,and regarding my own translation being used as someone else's i can easily change my interpretation to what is written in the book.Like you said i tried to reach a concensus ,i have given 10 sources to justify my stand but Sitush hasnt been able to give any source to his stand .

There are two issues. One is what weight to give your sources. That can be hashed out on the talk page (and don't put a deadline of a couple hours for a response - a few days is reasonable). Second, and more disturbing, are your multiple attempts to pass off your own translation as someone else's despite being told not to. Putting a reference after the quoted translation implies the exact quote is found in the source. This is misleading at best and deliberate falsification at worst. You need to understand this. --NeilN 16:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

talk to meI have removed your major concern over my translation with the exact quotes from the book ,now i dont think we should have a problem Devagyarishi238 (talk) 17:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Varna (Hinduism). NeilN 16:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)