| Revision as of 21:55, 13 August 2014 editBritishinvader (talk | contribs)92 edits →Breaking the law: bye← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:05, 13 August 2014 edit undoTeflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers140,333 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| * {{u|Dan56}}, {{u|Drmies}}, {{u|DoRD}}, {{u|Kww}}, and {{u|Jimbo Wales}}, the law states that is a determining factor in a file's fair use. Per Harvard University's Office of the General Counsel, the accepted max is Dan56 has violated this law at least 90 times, and if you refuse to do anything about it you will all be parties to copyright infringement. ] (]) 21:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | * {{u|Dan56}}, {{u|Drmies}}, {{u|DoRD}}, {{u|Kww}}, and {{u|Jimbo Wales}}, the law states that is a determining factor in a file's fair use. Per Harvard University's Office of the General Counsel, the accepted max is Dan56 has violated this law at least 90 times, and if you refuse to do anything about it you will all be parties to copyright infringement. ] (]) 21:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::: You're mistaking Harvard University's "proposed guidelines" for "a law"--the Harvard University website (?) says the "proposed guidelines" ("of most relevance to course websites"?) are "endeavored to establish a fair use 'safe harbor,' not to define the outer boundaries of fair use. It may not be feasible to follow the proposed guidelines in all respects—and fair use does not require that you do so". And plz stop pretending like you care more about copyright law than about your personal issue with me 9_9 ] (]) 21:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::: If you want to invite admins and others to a legit discussion on the rules, don't because you don't agree with them. ] (]) 22:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:05, 13 August 2014
Britishinvader, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Britishinvader! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Breaking the law
DoRD, I will be happy to report you as an accessory to mass copyright violation. Britishinvader (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Jimbo Wales, in an effort to protect Dan56, two of your admins are allowing 100 blatant copyright violations to go un-resolved. Britishinvader (talk) 19:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Drmies, per Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion, "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag from it. Only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so. A creator who disagrees with the speedy deletion should instead click on the Contest this speedy deletion button which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag." Dannyboy has broken this guideline at least 50 times. Why are you protecting this little twat? Britishinvader (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Per WP:SOCK, "Do not use multiple accounts to mislead, deceive, vandalize or disrupt; to create the illusion of greater support for a position; to stir up controversy; or to circumvent a block, ban, or sanction." Dan56 (talk) 19:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- FYI, per WP:SAMPLE's rule of thumb, none of the samples from what I've uploaded these past five or six years exceed 30 seconds and all are of reduced quality; originals were 128 kbs, and none exceed that. Do you really care about copyright issues at WP or are you just trying to lawyer around a "rule of thumb" in a misguided to attempt to spite me for rubbing you the wrong way in your past accounts? Dan56 (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Danny, an OGG file can only be 30 seconds if the song is 5 minutes or more, so forget about the quality, the vast majority of the OGGs that you've uploaded are too long no matter the quality. That is not a rule of thumb, that's a hard and fast guideline you idiot! You have 30 second samples of songs that are barely 1 minute in length! Britishinvader (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- WP:SAMPLE#Guidelines → "As a rule of thumb, samples should...." Dan56 (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Music samples#What is the maximum length permitted? Does maximum length permitted really sound like a suggestion? Your low IQ is a determent to your editing. We'll see if the copyright holders have an issue, and if they do Misplaced Pages will get sued because of you! Britishinvader (talk) 19:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- WP:SAMPLE#Guidelines → "As a rule of thumb, samples should...." Dan56 (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I don't think I'm protecting anyone, and I wouldn't call Dan a twat. You are welcome to take this Massive Abuse Against The World to the proper place--User talk:Jimbo Wales. As for your soundbytes, I have no opinion. I can't really know everything, you know. Drmies (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Drmies, 1) if I went to Jimbo's page Kww would just block me, 2) some of Danny's files are 30 seconds of 1 minute 30 second song, which is much greater than the 10% that the guideline allows. See Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Music samples#What is the maximum length permitted? Tha vast majority of Danny's uploads are too long. I am really disheartened at the corruption around here, but it was a terrible experience from the start. I know some people who work at a major publication, so I'll take my concerns to the media and the copyright holders. I'm glad that this is all on record for the courts! Britishinvader (talk) 21:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Dan56, Drmies, DoRD, Kww, and Jimbo Wales, the law states that "the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole" is a determining factor in a file's fair use. Per Harvard University's Office of the General Counsel, the accepted max is "10% or 30 seconds, whichever is less, of a musical work" Dan56 has violated this law at least 90 times, and if you refuse to do anything about it you will all be parties to copyright infringement. Britishinvader (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- You're mistaking Harvard University's "proposed guidelines" for "a law"--the Harvard University website (?) says the "proposed guidelines" ("of most relevance to course websites"?) are "endeavored to establish a fair use 'safe harbor,' not to define the outer boundaries of fair use. It may not be feasible to follow the proposed guidelines in all respects—and fair use does not require that you do so". And plz stop pretending like you care more about copyright law than about your personal issue with me 9_9 Dan56 (talk) 21:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- If you want to invite admins and others to a legit discussion on the rules, don't remove substantial comments because you don't agree with them. Dan56 (talk) 22:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)