| Revision as of 19:19, 16 August 2014 editA1candidate (talk | contribs)15,335 edits Undid revision 621522219 by 2over0 (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:03, 27 August 2014 edit undoJohn Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users176,670 edits →Talk:Acupuncture: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::This is what the source says: "Bizarrely, the ‘Ice Man’, who lived in the Alps about 5000 years ago, displays tattoo marks on his body which correspond to acupuncture points. To '''some experts''', this suggests that an acupuncture-like therapy was already used in Europe 5 millennia ago ." | ::This is what the source says: "Bizarrely, the ‘Ice Man’, who lived in the Alps about 5000 years ago, displays tattoo marks on his body which correspond to acupuncture points. To '''some experts''', this suggests that an acupuncture-like therapy was already used in Europe 5 millennia ago ." | ||
| ::Please strike your misleading comments on the talk page and . ] (]) 16:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC) | ::Please strike your misleading comments on the talk page and . ] (]) 16:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| I believe that there are very good reasons to think that your recent edits on the above page would be seen by many if not most people as being of a tendentious and/or disruptive nature and also can be seen as being in violation of ]. You have been advised to take your concerns to the RSN and have apparently chosen not to do so as opposed to engaging in perhaps tendentious editing on the talk page. This is I believe a very serious concern because ArbCom has placed sanctions on content in a topic area which this article has been found to be within. Should you continue to engage in such nonproductive editing on the article talk page there is a very serious chance your conduct may be brought to attention at one of the noticeboards. Please refrain from further nonproductive editing on the article talk page. I suppose I should say this is a warning. ] (]) 01:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, 27 August 2014
Please be more careful next time
Please don't mass delete medrs compliant sources. Your edit summary does not give a valid reason to delete text and sources you don't like. QuackGuru (talk) 03:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You need consensus before adding it. Iceman hypothesis is not supported by evidence. -A1candidate (talk) 09:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- You were previously warned about misrepresenting a source.
- You have not shown on the talk page what is the problem with all my edits.
- You claim "The Ice Man hypothesis is not supported by any scientific evidence."
- Your comment on the talk page is not correct according to the reliable source. The source does not say that it is a hypothesis that is not supported by any scientific evidence.
- Your comment on the talk page suggests I added original research to the article but I did no such thing. I get the impression you did not read the full text and blindly reverted.
- This is what the source says: "Bizarrely, the ‘Ice Man’, who lived in the Alps about 5000 years ago, displays tattoo marks on his body which correspond to acupuncture points. To some experts, this suggests that an acupuncture-like therapy was already used in Europe 5 millennia ago ."
- Please strike your misleading comments on the talk page and revert your edit. QuackGuru (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Acupuncture
I believe that there are very good reasons to think that your recent edits on the above page would be seen by many if not most people as being of a tendentious and/or disruptive nature and also can be seen as being in violation of WP:IDHT. You have been advised to take your concerns to the RSN and have apparently chosen not to do so as opposed to engaging in perhaps tendentious editing on the talk page. This is I believe a very serious concern because ArbCom has placed sanctions on content in a topic area which this article has been found to be within. Should you continue to engage in such nonproductive editing on the article talk page there is a very serious chance your conduct may be brought to attention at one of the noticeboards. Please refrain from further nonproductive editing on the article talk page. I suppose I should say this is a warning. John Carter (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)