Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:49, 5 September 2014

Siddheart

Siddheart (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Siddheart/Archive.

04 September 2014

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• AbhinavKumar1289 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Name matches with the indef blocked sock Astronautabhinavstar of this user. Same weeping about Ambedkar's professions, - Today he jumped to recover a edit. He had added it with his main account. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Gaurav seems to be working to derail this report. I don't see even a single sentence that was actually required. Knowing that Gaurav is argumentative, I would let him know that;

• AbhinavKumar1289 is a obvious sock puppet, account made only for backing up the particular edits that he made on other blocked accounts.
• Just because you are interested in making non existing claims, I would be impressed if you had said that indeed "all Dalits" have viewed this article but none of them shared strange views like this sock master who is in the territory of long term abusers.
• And about your last point. Lets make it clear, it is has been always a great idea to block anyone who is disrupting whether this website or any other by posting false stories and misrepresentation of unreliable sources.

Now even if he has already started saying "Please I beg from you to not block me".. on his own talk page, he thinks that he will be pardoned. It becomes even more obvious that he still don't seem to be understanding anything. He will probably resume posting inflammatory and abusive content on the talk pages, article pages, edit summaries once he is blocked on any of his sock puppet. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

IP match is just a confirmation that accounts are abused by 1 person, during wikimania or meetups, users of this website may share same IP. Behavior match is more important and anyone can agree that it is a sock. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

User:Bladesmulti first stop attacking me unnecessarily. You are a good editor. I am here to edit wikipedia not to fight with you. Again sorry if I have hurted any of your sentiments. You went furious after me because I am a Dalit (Low caste person)since my first edit on wikipedia. I request the admins to block all other Ids if there are any and allow me to edit. am not here to disrupt wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbhinavKumar1289 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 4 September 2014‎ (UTC)

I would like to defend User:Akshatra, User:Akhil.bharathan and User:AbhinavKumar1289:

1. User:Bladesmulti suspects that these users are sockpuppets of User:Siddheart. The evidence provided is that all of them are "weeping about Ambedkar's professions". I would like to point that all Dalits (members of a Scheduled Caste) would share these sentiments, so this des not imply the users to be sockpuppets.
2. User:Akshatra, User:Akhil.bharathan, User:AbhinavKumar1289 and me were part of some debates against User:Bladesmulti and User:NeilN. I cannot say whether they are sockpuppets, however they had made some valid comments. User:Bladesmulti, instead of answering their comments, labelled them sockpuppets.
3. Caste System is a controversial subject. I feel that blocking all users that share a particular viewpoint has left pages like Caste_system_in_India and Criticism_of_Hinduism with a very biased content. --Gaurav (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Should I also post on the Sockpuppet investigation page of User:Akshatra and User:Akhil.bharathan? --Gaurav (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gauravsood0289: No, seriously, you need to do as I suggested and read the casepage Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/Siddheart/Archive and talk pages of the users in question. Have you done that? --NeilN 16:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Can you tell me how Misplaced Pages identifies someone as a sockpuppet? Since User:AbhinavKumar1289 has made very few edits so far, I assume Misplaced Pages would not be able to find any correlation between his posts and those of User:Siddheart. So, I assume that he may be blocked solely on the basis of comments of other users, and so I came to defend him. If this is not the procedure, please let me know. --Gaurav (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Gauravsood0289: A checkuser was asked for. See Misplaced Pages:CheckUser. --NeilN 16:38, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I just stated my opinion because the section was titled "Comments by other users"; and I assume this is the purpose of the section. Anyway, if I was not supposed to defend, the SPI clerk will ignore my comments. So, I assume I haven't done any harm --Gaurav (talk) 18:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Gaurav, you can state your opinion. However I asked if you had taken into account the checkuser conclusion and evidence brought by another editor before defending two first two editors you named. --NeilN 18:15, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Since many people are part of a Virtual private network and therefore share their IP with other users, I assumed that IP is not the final criteria for blocking. So, I assumed that your and User:Bladesmulti's comments have played part in User:Akshatra and User:Akhil.bharathan being blocked. I just wanted to give them a fair trial. My assumptions may be incorrect and I may have made mistakes; and so the SPI clerk/admin is free to ignore my comments, if he likes. Therefore, I don't think there is any point in taking this conversation any further. --Gaurav (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• AbhinavKumar1289 is  Likely, clerks might like to have a look at any relation there might be to Gauravsood0289 (I haven't checked). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

• Open SPI cases
• SPI cases awaiting administration
• SPI cases CU complete