| Revision as of 12:37, 4 October 2014 editBedsBookworm (talk | contribs)180 edits →Hello: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:59, 4 October 2014 edit undoLecen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,620 edits →Hello: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| Glad to see you editing again. ] (]) 12:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | Glad to see you editing again. ] (]) 12:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :BTW please check my talk page, I've come across that Langus character before and he was decidedly unpleasant. I'm sorry you seem to have attracted his attention. ] (]) 12:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | :BTW please check my talk page, I've come across that Langus character before and he was decidedly unpleasant. I'm sorry you seem to have attracted his attention. ] (]) 12:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi! Well, I know his kind and I won't waste time with him anymore. The problem is that peripheral articles like Juan Manuel de Rosas do not attract sufficient attention. When they do, editors with no knowledge of what is being discussed are the ones who show up. It's a shame that Langus can push his POV without impunity. But what can I do? --] (]) 13:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:59, 4 October 2014
 Archives (Index) |
October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Juan Manuel de Rosas may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- provinces, since they depended on the port of Buenos Aires to export. Discontentment grew within.{{sfn|Lynch|1981|p=202} On 28 February 1839 the province of Corrientes revolted and attacked both
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Juan Manuel de Rosas. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.
Your behavior of WP:CENSORSHIP towards other points of view as well as your poor use of talk page to discuss this disagreement will get you blocked. Langus (t) 00:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- This is the second time you've threatened me for opposing your attempts to remove sourced info and replace it with unsourced text, as well as for pushing your POV. Are you sure you want to keep doing it? --Lecen (talk) 00:59, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Lecen, this is something that you are escalating and I have to confess you are doing a great job in getting on my nerves. Tomorrow I'll start a request for comments o a request in the Dispute resolution noticeboard to discuss this phobia you have with the revisionist movement. In the meanwhile, I ask you to please refrain from introducing further modifications to the article. Please, show some good faith. Thank you. --Langus (t) 01:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm sorry: are telling me not to edit the article? Are you accusing me of editing on bad faith? Are you saying that you're getting nervous because someone didn't accept your attempts to remove sourced information? --Lecen (talk) 01:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm asking you to not to edit the article until we get this sorted out, yes. The rest of your rant is terribly wrong. BTW, this incident could've been prevented if you wouldn't have ignored me at Talk:Juan_Manuel_de_Rosas#Bold_reverts. --Langus (t) 01:21, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- So, you felt ignored, and angered by that you started to remove sourced content? Is that correct? I don't know if you noticed, but I answered each of your questions. --Lecen (talk) 01:23, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- No, that's not correct. And no, you didn't. --Langus (t) 04:37, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Manuel de Rosas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Gore. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Glad to see you editing again. BedsBookworm (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- BTW please check my talk page, I've come across that Langus character before and he was decidedly unpleasant. I'm sorry you seem to have attracted his attention. BedsBookworm (talk) 12:37, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi! Well, I know his kind and I won't waste time with him anymore. The problem is that peripheral articles like Juan Manuel de Rosas do not attract sufficient attention. When they do, editors with no knowledge of what is being discussed are the ones who show up. It's a shame that Langus can push his POV without impunity. But what can I do? --Lecen (talk) 13:59, 4 October 2014 (UTC)