| Revision as of 20:23, 5 October 2014 editWinkelvi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,145 edits →User-reported: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:26, 5 October 2014 edit undoChoor monster (talk | contribs)7,028 edits →User-reportedNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| *{{vandal|Xploitinfotech}} – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ] (]) 19:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | *{{vandal|Xploitinfotech}} – account is being used only for promotional purposes. ] (]) 19:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *{{IPvandal|67.177.218.12}} – On ]:. Vandalism/harassment only account as evidenced by this comment: . Also, please see this comment left on a registered editor's talk page a couple of years ago. It seems the IP might belong to an active editor who logs out and uses an IP to harass editors they either don't like or disagree with. Without an idea of who the editor might be, an SPI is impossible to file, even though, in my opinion, a CU would be helpful in this case. Regardless, this IP has a history of harassment on editor talk pages. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|67.177.218.12}} – On ]:. Vandalism/harassment only account as evidenced by this comment: . Also, please see this comment left on a registered editor's talk page a couple of years ago. It seems the IP might belong to an active editor who logs out and uses an IP to harass editors they either don't like or disagree with. Without an idea of who the editor might be, an SPI is impossible to file, even though, in my opinion, a CU would be helpful in this case. Regardless, this IP has a history of harassment on editor talk pages. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| **This report is a misuse of this noticeboard. You were not harassed, there was no vandalism, there is no case to investigate. ] (]) 20:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 5 October 2014
"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Misplaced Pages:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 12:26 on 8 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
- Asvkooof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- KeiTakahashi999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Kian123456abc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 93.107.212.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- 137.22.179.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - List of natural disasters by death toll was changed by 137.22.179.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932863 on 2025-01-08T11:57:07+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 11:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Xploitinfotech (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Wgolf (talk) 19:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- 67.177.218.12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On User talk:Winkelvi:. Vandalism/harassment only account as evidenced by this comment: . Also, please see this comment left on a registered editor's talk page a couple of years ago. It seems the IP might belong to an active editor who logs out and uses an IP to harass editors they either don't like or disagree with. Without an idea of who the editor might be, an SPI is impossible to file, even though, in my opinion, a CU would be helpful in this case. Regardless, this IP has a history of harassment on editor talk pages. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 19:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
- This report is a misuse of this noticeboard. You were not harassed, there was no vandalism, there is no case to investigate. Choor monster (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)