Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Theodore Shulman (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:48, 19 October 2014 editJuno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,177 edits Was also mentioned on CNN.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:19, 19 October 2014 edit undoPostdlf (talk | contribs)Administrators91,186 edits fixing incorrectly formatted nominationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodore Shulman}}</ul></div>
:{{la|Theodore Shulman}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources AFD|Theodore Shulman}})
NOMINATED FOR DELETION: Shulman is not notable enough, and his crime not significant enough, to merit a wikipedia article. He is not, as per ], "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". NOMINATED FOR DELETION: Shulman is not notable enough, and his crime not significant enough, to merit a wikipedia article. He is not, as per ], "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded".


Shulman did not commit any act of violence, but only predicted same. Shulman did not commit any act of violence, but only predicted same.


As the Mother Jones article<ref>http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/04/theodore-shulman-arrested-indictment-death-threats</ref> points out, Shulman did not threaten to harm anyone HIMSELF, but merely stated that SOMEONE would likely do so. His posts and phone calls were therefore not threats but warnings and predictions, although he pled guilty to one count of "threatening to injure another person" in order to get a lower sentence. As the Mother Jones article points out, Shulman did not threaten to harm anyone HIMSELF, but merely stated that SOMEONE would likely do so. His posts and phone calls were therefore not threats but warnings and predictions, although he pled guilty to one count of "threatening to injure another person" in order to get a lower sentence.


If we gave everyone who makes a threat or even everyone who pleads guilty to making a threat over the abortion issue their own wikipedia page, wikipedia would run out of storage space. If we gave everyone who makes a threat or even everyone who pleads guilty to making a threat over the abortion issue their own wikipedia page, wikipedia would run out of storage space.

Revision as of 15:19, 19 October 2014

Theodore Shulman

AfDs for this article:
Theodore Shulman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NOMINATED FOR DELETION: Shulman is not notable enough, and his crime not significant enough, to merit a wikipedia article. He is not, as per WP:BIO, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded".

Shulman did not commit any act of violence, but only predicted same.

As the Mother Jones article points out, Shulman did not threaten to harm anyone HIMSELF, but merely stated that SOMEONE would likely do so. His posts and phone calls were therefore not threats but warnings and predictions, although he pled guilty to one count of "threatening to injure another person" in order to get a lower sentence.

If we gave everyone who makes a threat or even everyone who pleads guilty to making a threat over the abortion issue their own wikipedia page, wikipedia would run out of storage space.

This article was nominated for deletion before and the decision was DELETE. Instead of using the WP: DELETE REVIEW process, which is the legitimate way to un-delete a deleted article, an editor has simply re-created another article with the same name, which is, according to my understanding, a no-no. Goblinshark17 (talk) 10:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The subject also got a shout out on CNN when they were discussing the possible use of Ricin by terrorists. Juno (talk) 11:48, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Categories: