Revision as of 18:24, 23 June 2006 editHurricanehink (talk | contribs)Administrators62,035 edits →Todo?← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:59, 11 July 2006 edit undoHurricanehink (talk | contribs)Administrators62,035 edits added {{GA}}Next edit → | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{hurricane|class= |
{{hurricane|class=GA|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{ |
{{GA}} | ||
== Merge == | == Merge == | ||
This should be merged. The storm did nothing as a tropical cyclone. There was damage associated from a precursor disturbance, but the actual storm did nada. ] 19:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | This should be merged. The storm did nothing as a tropical cyclone. There was damage associated from a precursor disturbance, but the actual storm did nada. ] 19:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
:::::::Yeah wasn't paying attention, just been having a hard time lately here (hence my low activity over past few days).--] (]) 18:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | :::::::Yeah wasn't paying attention, just been having a hard time lately here (hence my low activity over past few days).--] (]) 18:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::::::Don't worry. I hope everything gets better soon. ] (<small>]</small>) 18:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | ::::::::Don't worry. I hope everything gets better soon. ] (<small>]</small>) 18:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
==GA passed== | |||
* An expansion on damages in other places and maybe some stuff about like Ireland where the trough ended would be nice but a great article overall. If it can be expanded, add to it. ] 15:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:59, 11 July 2006
Tropical Storm Leslie (2000) has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}. |
Merge
This should be merged. The storm did nothing as a tropical cyclone. There was damage associated from a precursor disturbance, but the actual storm did nada. Hurricanehink 19:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Jdorje 19:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- OK. Done. Hurricanehink 22:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
Todo?
So much for the above. OK. What's needed for B class? Hurricanehink (talk) 02:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's a B, though surely a bit more detail for Bermuda and Newfoundland can be found - they should be distinct sections IMO. There's no mention of retirement either. Oh and a minor thing, the footnotes are supposed to be immediately after the punctuation, not with a space separating them.--Nilfanion (talk) 15:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. There was very little impact on those places. I got the rest. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- And I cleaned up after you (nbsp and footnotes after punctuation) :P If thats all that can be said about non-US impact, I'd favor dropping all mention of Bermuda, the unneeded warning is mentioned in preparations. Bermuda and Newfoundland are so far apart geographically (and chronologically) that it seems silly to have them lumped together like that. The retirement sentence is a bit strong, it implies retirement would have happened had it been Leslie and not the precursor that did the damage (that isn't certain).--Nilfanion (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Damn it! Thanks for cleaning up after me. Now I feel like a complete idiot. Dropping Bermuda works. Is the retirement section better? On an aside, Leslie might have been retired if it hit Florida, though probably not. They didn't retire any previous storms, and it took Allison's far-reaching effects a year later to retire a tropical storm. It doesn't matter, though. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah it works, nothing much to complain about really now.--Nilfanion (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Now I have a complaint. Given that the storm caused nearly $1 billion in damage, should it really be low importance? Hurricanehink (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah wasn't paying attention, just been having a hard time lately here (hence my low activity over past few days).--Nilfanion (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Don't worry. I hope everything gets better soon. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:24, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah wasn't paying attention, just been having a hard time lately here (hence my low activity over past few days).--Nilfanion (talk) 18:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Now I have a complaint. Given that the storm caused nearly $1 billion in damage, should it really be low importance? Hurricanehink (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah it works, nothing much to complain about really now.--Nilfanion (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Damn it! Thanks for cleaning up after me. Now I feel like a complete idiot. Dropping Bermuda works. Is the retirement section better? On an aside, Leslie might have been retired if it hit Florida, though probably not. They didn't retire any previous storms, and it took Allison's far-reaching effects a year later to retire a tropical storm. It doesn't matter, though. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- And I cleaned up after you (nbsp and footnotes after punctuation) :P If thats all that can be said about non-US impact, I'd favor dropping all mention of Bermuda, the unneeded warning is mentioned in preparations. Bermuda and Newfoundland are so far apart geographically (and chronologically) that it seems silly to have them lumped together like that. The retirement sentence is a bit strong, it implies retirement would have happened had it been Leslie and not the precursor that did the damage (that isn't certain).--Nilfanion (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. There was very little impact on those places. I got the rest. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
GA passed
- An expansion on damages in other places and maybe some stuff about like Ireland where the trough ended would be nice but a great article overall. If it can be expanded, add to it. Lincher 15:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)