Misplaced Pages

User talk:Salvio giuliano: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:47, 2 November 2014 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,282 edits →Deletion review: You don't seem to want to answer here - fine← Previous edit Revision as of 17:41, 2 November 2014 edit undoBengaliHindu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,332 edits →Request for arbitration: new sectionNext edit →
Line 67: Line 67:
</div></div> </div></div>
<!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=631406560 --> <!-- Message sent by User:LivingBot@enwiki using the list at http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Wikipedia_Signpost/Tools/Spamlist&oldid=631406560 -->

== Request for arbitration ==

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thanks,<!-- Template:Arbcom notice -->
] (]) 17:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:41, 2 November 2014

Salvio giuliano is suffering from physical health issues. This may affect their ability to work on Misplaced Pages. Consequently, they may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated.
If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error (even a really stupid one) on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. Thank you.

If you are here to inquire as to why I deleted an article you created, please read this page and, if it does not satisfy your curiosity, please drop me a line by clicking here.

Admin policy. Fellow administrators, if you disagree with one of my admin actions, please feel free to revert it. I just kindly ask you to leave an informative edit summary as to why you think I made a mistake; alternatively, if you prefer, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Finally, seeing as I am awfully forgetful lately, if you have asked me something either here or in private and I have not replied within a reasonable time, please do not hesitate to contact me again.

“ → I don't think I'm easy to talk about. ” — Today's Motto of the Day



Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Blue Morpho Ayahuasca center

Hello, I ran across this article today, and nominated it for AfD. Then I clicked on the AfD entry and found my nomination was maybe the second, and the first nomination was closed as delete... I noticed you were the one who closed the AfD for Blue Morpho Ayahuasca center. So I thought rather than doing anything else, I would ask you about it and what if anything I should do. Should I nominate it for a second AfD or was this entry just somehow passed over? Or maybe re-created? Thanks~ :-) Jtbobwaysf (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The recreation of the article was allowed as a result of this DRV discussion. As a side note, given the result of that discussion, my feeling is that the AFD will be closed as keep, so it's probably useless to nominate the page for deletion... Salvio 13:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm confused, the result of this DRV discussion was to endorse delete. DRV says: "Deletion endorsed. Recreation of substantively improved drafts are at editorial discretion (substantively moot, as an improved version is present)." Does that mean that deletion was endorsed, then someone recreated the deleted article and improved it? Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
More or less. I originally closed the AfD as delete, because the consensus was there was no evidence the centre was notable; another editor questioned my closure and asked for it to be review at DRV, where he provided evidence establishing notability. Since it's common practice for articles to be undeleted while they're being discussed and since the commenters reached the conclusion my original closure was correct, but, based on the new evidence provided by the other user, the article could be recreated, the undeletion was left to stand and the article hasn't been touched since. Salvio 19:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

BengaliHindu

BengaliHindu has been blocked for Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/BengaliHindu socking but Checkuser Report was inconclusive that it was a only a possible match . 5 of the 10 edits of Abhijit4law are clear copyright violations whereas BengaliHindu has no history of copyright violations as far I can see.Further he been editing for nearly 5 years with over 5600 Edits with no previous blocks.The other editor has Nirmalya1234 has only 3 edits 2 reverts and 3rd one copy paste text which an established editor will not do .Blocking Admin is right and it is within his discretion.But feel here BengaliHindu needs to be unblocked per WP:AGF here as the behavioral evidence is not very clear .As you are Checkuser can you clarify on this and take a call on this .Thank you Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

I think only an established editor knows about SPI rules and how to avoid behavioral match by making edits which do not match with his own edits.--MehulWB (talk) 07:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. .He posted an unblock request which I have taken to ANI as you seem to away.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Sock Blocked ?

I saw that you reverted edits by GeorgiePorgiePuddingPie. I also see that you blocked that editor. Am I correct in assuming that you did this based on the duck test that it quacked like the banned troll Jim Siduri? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

You're quite right. The quacking was deafening. Salvio 19:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Lead section

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

Request for arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Ahmed Hassan Imran and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, BengaliHindu (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Categories: