Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:23, 12 November 2014

October 2014

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.

When editing Misplaced Pages, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Don't Stand So Close to Me does not have an edit summary. Please make sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

We have recurring vandals who seem to be obsessed with changing dates, times and other assorted numbers in articles such as Don't Stand So Close to Me. Upon examination -- requiring absurd amounts of work -- the changes turn out to be completely random. Basically, this leaves us with two choices: Absurd amounts of work to verify edits from someone who doesn't use edit summaries or cite sources or reverting the edits and demanding edit summaries and sources.

You are making a change without explanation or a source. I'm reverting it again. If you would like to restore your edit, please cite a source for the change and/or use an edit summary that explains where you got your times from. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Please cite a source for the change and/or use an edit summary that explains where you got your times from. - SummerPhD (talk) 03:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

You may yet have to join us on the EVIL list, above... Pinkbeast (talk) 03:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

I have added cites for the article. - SumevilPhD (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

SumevilPhD? I thought it was SummerPhD! You're not even on the evil list!

Yay! Now I am! I'd like to thank God, the Academy and most of all my wonderful wife. Without all of you, I never could have achieved this honor. Thank you! - OfficiallyEVIL (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

I have reverted the founding date of Jehovah's Witnesses. No such claim can be made. But feel free to start a discussion if you have some reliable sources you'd like to raise. BlackCab (TALK) 21:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to There's Never a Forever Thing, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Avono♂ (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with There's Never a Forever Thing. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

This is why you are EVIL, SummerPhD.

Not really, that's a misunderstanding. My restoring AfD tags from articles is merely a symptom of my being evil. The reason I'm evil is because God made me evil, so that I can go to Hell and suffer for all eternity. He enjoys that kinda thing. Maybe He should be on your list. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Never.Matt200055 (talk) 01:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Jeffro77 (talk) 00:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

• Matt200055, disruption is blockable, the length of time depending on the severity of the disruption. That includes maintaining "evil" lists, but also disruptive editing--genre warring, reverting without explanation, adding unverified information (such as on Taylor Swift), and removing valid information (such as in Template:A-ha). Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:12, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

IT WAS VERIFIED. Check the new album, "1989". — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntiMatt200055 of Alternatia (talk • contribs) 04:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt200055, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.

SummerPhD (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Opening of Sockpuppet Investigation

Who would this editor be that opened this investigation? Matt200055 (talk) 04:51, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

That would be me. I created the investigation in error and have asked for it to be deleted. Please see the question below, though. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Matt200055 = AntiMatt20055?

Please clarify: What is the relationship between these accounts? Is there a reason you have two user names? - SummerPhD (talk) 04:53, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Just in case this account got hacked, I would have a backup. Matt200055 (talk) 04:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Given your recent inappropriate behaviour, I'm not buying that excuse, particularly since you're concurrently using both accounts.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

You callin' me a liar?! Matt200055 (talk) 05:09, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm calling you an editor who is known to resort to mischief such as maintaining inappropriate lists of perceived wrongs and vandalising User pages when you don't get your own way instead of discussing on article Talk pages.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Vandalising user pages? Matt200055 (talk) 05:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes. But you already know that.--Jeffro77 (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Give proof that I am a vandal towards user pages. C'mon, give proof! Matt200055 (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please hold off on further discussion. I have requested administrator assistance before this goes any further. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

SummerPHD likes making Sockpuppet allegations that both lack evidence and are totally wrong. Check this out....William 02:23, 12 November 2014 (UTC)