Revision as of 20:27, 9 November 2014 editMike V (talk | contribs)28,285 edits close← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:55, 12 November 2014 edit undoKrzyhorse22 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,844 editsm →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin commentsNext edit → | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
*I think the evidence presented does not establish any connection between the two users. Having a similar interest does not necessarily mean that an account is a sockpuppet. Also, the timeframe of edits from and strongly suggests that they are located in different parts of the world. I'm closing this case with no action taken. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | *I think the evidence presented does not establish any connection between the two users. Having a similar interest does not necessarily mean that an account is a sockpuppet. Also, the timeframe of edits from and strongly suggests that they are located in different parts of the world. I'm closing this case with no action taken. <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 20:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
**Before you close can you please check if ], ] and ] are the same person. The location, particular interest, making very similar edits on the same article , POV and the level of English support my suspicion. He claims to be editing Misplaced Pages since 2005, which highly suggests that he has been using other accounts in the past. See also and --] (]) 10:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 10:55, 12 November 2014
Faizan
Faizan (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizan/Archive.
09 November 2014
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Faizan (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- TheSawTooth (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Operation_Zarb-e-Azb&action=history and https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TheSawTooth User:Faizan suspected meatpuppet and user:TheSawTooth persuaded and brought into the dispute, to reverts edits on the article Operation Zarb-e-Azb so user:faizan can avoid being reported for edit warring. I have removed my own view and user:Faizan view and wrote with the undid revision "(I have removed my own view which was (CIA drone strikes should be added in belligerents) ...User:TheSawTooth and User:Faizan view that afghan militants" should added in belligerents. I think we should resolves the dispute on talk page first.)". User:TheSawtooth keeps undoing my revision. For proof you can see https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Operation_Zarb-e-Azb&action=history and on User:TheSawTooth talk-page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:TheSawTooth ) you can see Faizan message to TheSawTooth whom was brought into the dispute . (User:TheSawTooth wasnt involved in the dispute before November 3. if you look at User:TheSawTooth contribution and interest it is clear that he/she has no interest in similar article and no way near and was brought into the dispute. for her contribution ( https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?limit=50&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=TheSawTooth&namespace=&tagfilter=&year=2014&month=-1 ). Thank you for your time regarding this and I wish this incident of suspected meat puppetry is investigated. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 11:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Insufficient evidence. Just because he reverted you does not mean that he is my sock. He's been active since even you started disruptive editing in the concerned article. Faizan 13:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- This Saadkhan12345 can edit(use) templates but despite repeatedly being informed on his talk to "sign your posts" , he does not learn to sign. Infact, just as a revenge-taking measure, he's opened an SPI against me as I reported him to ANI for edit-warring this morning. Faizan 13:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- The reporting user said above: "you can see Faizan message to TheSawTooth whom was brought into the dispute". I did not message or try to canvass him, instead just welcomed him. Faizan 14:55, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- This Saadkhan12345 can edit(use) templates but despite repeatedly being informed on his talk to "sign your posts" , he does not learn to sign. Infact, just as a revenge-taking measure, he's opened an SPI against me as I reported him to ANI for edit-warring this morning. Faizan 13:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have never met Faizan or Saadkhan except on Misplaced Pages I did a review of references and revised it. First Saadkhan gave me barnstar (see my page) so that I do not revise when I did not obey he got aggressive. Khans have close racial association with Afghans, so you see Saadkhan keeps removing Afghan militants from belligerents every day to make it look daisy. One thing more, I have edited other topics of Pakistan operations how is Saadkhan saying I have no interest in this. I move to block Saadkhan for such frivolous report. --TheSawTooth (talk) 17:10, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I think the evidence presented does not establish any connection between the two users. Having a similar interest does not necessarily mean that an account is a sockpuppet. Also, the timeframe of edits from Faizan and The SawTooth strongly suggests that they are located in different parts of the world. I'm closing this case with no action taken. Mike V • Talk 20:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Before you close can you please check if User:Faizannehal, User:Faizanalivarya and User:Faizan are the same person. The location, particular interest, making very similar edits on the same article , POV and the level of English support my suspicion. He claims to be editing Misplaced Pages since 2005, which highly suggests that he has been using other accounts in the past. See also and --Krzyhorse22 (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Categories: