| Revision as of 18:36, 12 November 2014 editThine Antique Pen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers67,470 edits why.← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 12 November 2014 edit undoDammst (talk | contribs)102 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''COMMENT''' DEAR ADMINISTRATORS, SOME OF THE USERS INVOLVED IN THIS DISCUSSION ARE USING MORE ACCOUNTS. '''Thine Antique Pen''' is another account of a user previously involved in the discussion. ] (]) 16:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC) | *'''COMMENT''' DEAR ADMINISTRATORS, SOME OF THE USERS INVOLVED IN THIS DISCUSSION ARE USING MORE ACCOUNTS. '''Thine Antique Pen''' is another account of a user previously involved in the discussion. ] (]) 16:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :*Accusing me of sockpuppetry, are you? ] (]) 18:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | :*Accusing me of sockpuppetry, are you? ] (]) 18:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| *'''COMMENT''' DEAR ADMINISTRATORS, ] IS LYING, HE IS JUST ANOTHER ACCOUNT OF A USER INVOLVED IN THIS DISCUSSION. PLEASE DON'T BELIEVE HIM! HE WILL TRICK YOU ALL. ] (]) 18:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:42, 12 November 2014
Raul Cătinaș
- Raul Cătinaș (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable kickboxer who fails to meet the kickboxing criteria at WP:KICK. Mdtemp (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 04:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 04:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Strong keep I invite you to delete all the kickboxers on Misplaced Pages, because you have established some strange rules excluding SuperKombat and not only. Catinas is a very known kickboxer, a top 20 heavyweight in the world, he was ranked #10 on LiverKick.com at some moment. The article is well written, he was the youngest the fighter to qualify for the K-1 Final 16, after Badr Hari. Based on your judgment, you can also start deleting Dževad Poturak, Brice Guidon, Paul Slowinski, Makoto Uehara, etc. Sometimes you need to be wise. Now I'm asking myself, you are anti-SK fighters only? I will personally talk to some administrators about this. Dammst (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Why have you spammed a message around to 21 administrators, who are not at all involved in this? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:16, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Suddenly you appeared from nowhere, you had 0 discussions about kickboxing previously. Moreover you even recommended deletion. These admins will be involved because somebody is manipulating big! Dammst (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- After reading my watchlist, I noticed your post on Jimbo's talk page. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Even if SuperKombat was considered one of the organizations that could show notability, it wouldn't do him any good since he hasn't fought for their world title. Feel free to change my vote if someone can show he was ranked in the world top 10 by a reliable and independent source.Mdtemp (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- Suddenly you appeared from nowhere, you had 0 discussions about kickboxing previously. Moreover you even recommended deletion. These admins will be involved because somebody is manipulating big! Dammst (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per not meeting WP:KICK#People, given the subject of the article hasn't fought for a major world title. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:15, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- COMMENT DEAR ADMINISTRATORS, SOME OF THE USERS INVOLVED IN THIS DISCUSSION ARE USING MORE ACCOUNTS. Thine Antique Pen is another account of a user previously involved in the discussion. Dammst (talk) 16:29, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Accusing me of sockpuppetry, are you? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- COMMENT DEAR ADMINISTRATORS, Thine Antique Pen IS LYING, HE IS JUST ANOTHER ACCOUNT OF A USER INVOLVED IN THIS DISCUSSION. PLEASE DON'T BELIEVE HIM! HE WILL TRICK YOU ALL. Dammst (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)