| Revision as of 14:01, 16 November 2014 editNorthamerica1000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators708,032 edits +N.b.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:34, 16 November 2014 edit undoIZAK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,945 edits make correctionNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| * '''Delete''' per nom. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' per nom. — ] <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 18:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' I agree with the writer, the subject is very interesting, at least to hundreds of people in my community. I don't know who those people that are requiring to delete it our, but it seems to me that they are people in the ] community that are known for hating everyone that leaves them, trying to shut them up, and hate when people speak up. I feel that for the sake of the people who left this community, this has to stay. Especially considering that Srully is of great interest because of his family status. (] (]) 20:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC))<small>— ] (] • ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small> | * '''Keep''' I agree with the writer, the subject is very interesting, at least to hundreds of people in my community. I don't know who those people that are requiring to delete it our, but it seems to me that they are people in the ] community that are known for hating everyone that leaves them, trying to shut them up, and hate when people speak up. I feel that for the sake of the people who left this community, this has to stay. Especially considering that Srully is of great interest because of his family status. (] (]) 20:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC))<small>— ] (] • ]) has made ] outside this topic. </small> | ||
| *'''Delete''' per User {{user| |
*'''Delete''' per User {{user|VQuakr}} and User {{user|Malik Shabazz}}. This article relies on personal blogs and self-promotion and no real RS at all. The article clearly violates ] & ] & ]. Maybe in a few years time, ''if'' the subject picks up fame/notoriety/whathaveyou and then gets ''seriously'' covered by the media (not just as part of minor family scandals) or is cited in reliable sources, the subject can be revisited, but for now there is not much of anything here to justify it as encyclopedic or "noteworthy". Thank you, ] (]) 13:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :*N.b. I have not !voted herein; I only provided deletion sorting. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | :*N.b. I have not !voted herein; I only provided deletion sorting. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::*{{ping|Northamerica1000}} Oversight on my part. I have now made the correction that it's User {{user|VQuakr}} I was referring to. Thank you, ] (]) 16:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:34, 16 November 2014
Srully Abe Stein
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Misplaced Pages contributors. Misplaced Pages has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}. |
- Srully Abe Stein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject lacks sufficient depth of coverage in reliable, intellectually independent sources to meet the notability guideline at WP:BASIC. VQuakr (talk) 07:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- they are links to Wall Street Journal, Haaratz, and an outside You Tube clip, as well as Kava Shtiebal Fourm (there was other fourm as well that was deleted by someone, they will be entered soon) thy clearly shows independent interest in this person. Fultichan (talk) 07:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- That would be here and here. Neither one appears to provide significant coverage of the subject. Youtube and forums are not reliable sources. VQuakr (talk) 07:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with Fultichan. Both of the articles linked although they also talk about other people, they chose Srully's picture, and that is how it was published. That does show significant interest in him. Also from the forums that were linked it is evident that at least in specific communities that is a big interest in Srully and his thoughts.
- I see that Fultichan asked on your talk page why you deleted th "writings" section. I agree with him, and it seems to be really interesting. Fultichan, I think you should add it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.50.157 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- I agree with Fultichan. Both of the articles linked although they also talk about other people, they chose Srully's picture, and that is how it was published. That does show significant interest in him. Also from the forums that were linked it is evident that at least in specific communities that is a big interest in Srully and his thoughts.
- That would be here and here. Neither one appears to provide significant coverage of the subject. Youtube and forums are not reliable sources. VQuakr (talk) 07:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 08:53, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 08:54, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica 08:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 18:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the writer, the subject is very interesting, at least to hundreds of people in my community. I don't know who those people that are requiring to delete it our, but it seems to me that they are people in the Hasidic community that are known for hating everyone that leaves them, trying to shut them up, and hate when people speak up. I feel that for the sake of the people who left this community, this has to stay. Especially considering that Srully is of great interest because of his family status. (Chavie Feldman (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC))— Chavie Feldman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Delete per User VQuakr (talk · contribs) and User Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs). This article relies on personal blogs and self-promotion and no real RS at all. The article clearly violates WP:NOTSOAPBOX & WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK & WP:NOTFORUM. Maybe in a few years time, if the subject picks up fame/notoriety/whathaveyou and then gets seriously covered by the media (not just as part of minor family scandals) or is cited in reliable sources, the subject can be revisited, but for now there is not much of anything here to justify it as encyclopedic or "noteworthy". Thank you, IZAK (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- N.b. I have not !voted herein; I only provided deletion sorting. NorthAmerica 14:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Northamerica1000: Oversight on my part. I have now made the correction that it's User VQuakr (talk · contribs) I was referring to. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)