| Revision as of 05:24, 18 November 2014 editZad68 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,355 edits →November 2014: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:52, 18 November 2014 edit undoAlbinoFerret (talk | contribs)11,178 edits →November 2014Next edit → | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | ||
| ==We need editors== | |||
| Hi Cheesy. The e-cigarette article needs editors. I like having someone else like you who sees the components section as important and in need of developing on the article. But the personal stuff has got to stop. I really really know its hard to bite your tong or sit on your hands. But it doesnt do any good to post some of the stuff they have links of you posting. I truly believe that some people do and say things hoping to get a reaction they can use against you. But posting stuff only plays into their game. Take some time to cool down. Strike the words you have posted in aggravation towards someone else. Be a better person and rise above it. Again, its not easy, it never is, and the Lord knows I have not always followed my own advice in the past. ] 06:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:52, 18 November 2014
Welcome!
|
Dispute resolution re McNeill for Electronic cigarette article
I requested dispute resolution with respect to this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Electronic_cigarette#Violation_of_consensus
Please join the discussion. Mihaister (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:CIVIL
This comment is not appropriate . Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- By now everyone knows Quack is basically your meatpuppet, after you gave him a barnstar in the middle of a discussion about his repeated disruptive editing.--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 23:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? Alexbrn 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hardly out-of-the-way; the incestuous relationship between Quack and Doc James is pretty common knowledge. And no, I don't have other accounts. Do you?--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) For a newish account that shows surprising familiarity with some out-of-the-way happenings from a while ago. Since you mention puppetry, I take it you are familiar with policy in this space. Have you got other accounts here? Alexbrn 06:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Second warning regarding civility
This was not an appropriate or collaborative, content-focused comment, and it was just one of many unnecessary sharp comments you've made at that article's already overly-contentious Talk page. Please reconsider your approach to working alongside your fellow editors. Zad68 05:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- It was perfectly appropriate, because the article is being destroyed by semi-literate idiots intent on forcing a medical agenda onto an article about a consumer product. And you can't seriously tell me that either Sieg Heilman or Quack has any significant mastery of the English language, because they don't.--CheesyAppleFlake (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Pinging Doc James and QuackGuru as you have mentioned them here, presumably as two of the individuals you're also identifying here as being included in your comment I've linked to above, in case they wish to respond.
Zad6805:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Pinging Doc James and QuackGuru as you have mentioned them here, presumably as two of the individuals you're also identifying here as being included in your comment I've linked to above, in case they wish to respond.
November 2014
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
We need editors
Hi Cheesy. The e-cigarette article needs editors. I like having someone else like you who sees the components section as important and in need of developing on the article. But the personal stuff has got to stop. I really really know its hard to bite your tong or sit on your hands. But it doesnt do any good to post some of the stuff they have links of you posting. I truly believe that some people do and say things hoping to get a reaction they can use against you. But posting stuff only plays into their game. Take some time to cool down. Strike the words you have posted in aggravation towards someone else. Be a better person and rise above it. Again, its not easy, it never is, and the Lord knows I have not always followed my own advice in the past. AlbinoFerret 06:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)