Revision as of 10:39, 26 November 2014 view sourceEkdalian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,097 edits →History: Quoting what the source says← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:15, 26 November 2014 view source Ekdalian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,097 edits →History: Stating what the source saysNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{quote|Originally the professions of Kayastha (scribe) and Vaidya (physician) were not restricted and could be followed by people from different varnas including the brahmanas. So there is every probability that a number of brahmana families were mixed up with members of other varnas in forming the present Kayastha and Vaidya communities of Bengal.<ref name="Sharma">{{cite book|last=Sharma|first=Tej Ram|title=Personal and Geographical Names in the Gupta Inscriptions|year=1978|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|location=New Delhi |page=115 |url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WcnnB-Lx2MAC}}</ref>}} | {{quote|Originally the professions of Kayastha (scribe) and Vaidya (physician) were not restricted and could be followed by people from different varnas including the brahmanas. So there is every probability that a number of brahmana families were mixed up with members of other varnas in forming the present Kayastha and Vaidya communities of Bengal.<ref name="Sharma">{{cite book|last=Sharma|first=Tej Ram|title=Personal and Geographical Names in the Gupta Inscriptions|year=1978|publisher=Concept Publishing Company|location=New Delhi |page=115 |url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=WcnnB-Lx2MAC}}</ref>}} | ||
According to ], another historian, the caste is first referred to around the 5th or 6th century and may well have become so identified during the period of the ]. Between that time and the 11th-12th century this category of officials or scribes was composed of "putative" ]s and, "for the larger majority", ]s, who retained their caste identity or became Buddhists. As in ], the Bengal region did not adhere to the ] of ] and |
According to ], another historian, the caste is first referred to around the 5th or 6th century and may well have become so identified during the period of the ]. Between that time and the 11th-12th century this category of officials or scribes was composed of "putative" ]s and, "for the larger majority", ]s, who retained their caste identity or became Buddhists. As in ], the Bengal region did not adhere to the ] of ] and had no clearly defined Kshatriya caste; only the Brahmins were considered as ]. In the 13th century, the ] considers the "''Rajaputra'' ('king's sons') caste" as a "high mixed caste of ] status".{{sfn|Wink|1991|p=269}} | ||
Sekhar Bandyopadhyay also places their emergence as a caste after the Gupta period. He says that since the Gupta period, "the linkages between caste and class became more visible, with those providing physical labour losing status to those who refrained from it, but controlled land, such as the Brahman, Kayastha and ], the three traditional higher castes of Bengal".<ref name="CasteCulture&Hegemony">{{cite book|first=Sekhar |last=Bandyopadhyay|title=Caste, Culture, and Hegemony: Social Dominance in Colonial Bengal|url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=rlgcrSezHT4C&q=Kayastha#v=snippet&q=Kayastha&f=false|year=2004|publisher=Sage Publications | isbn=81-7829-316-1 | page=20}}</ref> The ], Sena and Varman Kings and their descendants, which claimed the status of Kshatriya, "almost imperceptibly merged" into this caste, "which also ranked as shudras".{{sfn|Wink|1991|p=269}} | Sekhar Bandyopadhyay also places their emergence as a caste after the Gupta period. He says that since the Gupta period, "the linkages between caste and class became more visible, with those providing physical labour losing status to those who refrained from it, but controlled land, such as the Brahman, Kayastha and ], the three traditional higher castes of Bengal".<ref name="CasteCulture&Hegemony">{{cite book|first=Sekhar |last=Bandyopadhyay|title=Caste, Culture, and Hegemony: Social Dominance in Colonial Bengal|url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=rlgcrSezHT4C&q=Kayastha#v=snippet&q=Kayastha&f=false|year=2004|publisher=Sage Publications | isbn=81-7829-316-1 | page=20}}</ref> The ], Sena and Varman Kings and their descendants, which claimed the status of Kshatriya, "almost imperceptibly merged" into this caste, "which also ranked as shudras".{{sfn|Wink|1991|p=269}} |
Revision as of 11:15, 26 November 2014
Bengali Kayastha is a community in Bengal. It is a regional subgroup of the Kayastha caste of India.
History
The office of Kayastha in Bengal was instituted before the Gupta period (c.320 to 550 CE), although there is no reference to Kayastha as a caste at that time. According to Tej Ram Sharma, an Indian historian, some scholars have noted that:
Originally the professions of Kayastha (scribe) and Vaidya (physician) were not restricted and could be followed by people from different varnas including the brahmanas. So there is every probability that a number of brahmana families were mixed up with members of other varnas in forming the present Kayastha and Vaidya communities of Bengal.
According to André Wink, another historian, the caste is first referred to around the 5th or 6th century and may well have become so identified during the period of the Sena dynasty. Between that time and the 11th-12th century this category of officials or scribes was composed of "putative" Kshatriyas and, "for the larger majority", Brahmins, who retained their caste identity or became Buddhists. As in South India, the Bengal region did not adhere to the varna system of Vedic Hinduism and had no clearly defined Kshatriya caste; only the Brahmins were considered as twice-born. In the 13th century, the Purana considers the "Rajaputra ('king's sons') caste" as a "high mixed caste of shudra status".
Sekhar Bandyopadhyay also places their emergence as a caste after the Gupta period. He says that since the Gupta period, "the linkages between caste and class became more visible, with those providing physical labour losing status to those who refrained from it, but controlled land, such as the Brahman, Kayastha and Baidya, the three traditional higher castes of Bengal". The Pala, Sena and Varman Kings and their descendants, which claimed the status of Kshatriya, "almost imperceptibly merged" into this caste, "which also ranked as shudras".
In the middle period of the history of Bengal, between 1500 and 1850 CE, the Kayasthas were regarded as one of the highest of Hindu castes in the region.
Subcastes
Kulina and Maulika
According to Inden, "many of the higher castes of India have historically been organized into ranked clans or lineages". The Bengali Kayastha was organized into smaller subcastes and even smaller ranked grades of clans (kulas) around 1500 CE. The four major subcastes were Daksina-radhi, Vangaja, Uttara-radhi and Varendra. The Daksina-radhi and Vangaja subcastes were further divided into Kulina or Kulin ("high clan rank") and Maulika or Maulik, the lower clan rank. The Maulika had four further "ranked grades". The Uttara-radhi and Varendra used the terms "Siddha", "Sadhya", "Kasta" and "Amulaja" to designate the grades in their subcastes.
Origin myths
Kulin Kayasthas have an associated myth of origin stating that five Kayasthas accompanied the Brahmins from Kanauj who had been invited to Bengal by the mythological king Adisur. Multiple versions of this legend exist, all considered by historians to be myth or folklore lacking historical authenticity. According to Swarupa Gupta this legend was
...fitted into a quasi-historical, sociological narrative of Bengal and deployed to explain the realities of caste and sub-caste origins and connections during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century.
According to this legend, the three clans to become the main Kulin Kayastha communities are Bose/Basu, Ghosh and Mitra.
Surnames and origin
Inden gives a detailed list of clan names or surnames used by the Bengali Kayasthas. Historian Kanaklal Barua also mentions these surnames while referring to the names of Brahmins recorded in the Nidhanpur inscription (610 AD) of King Bhaskaravarman, the Tippera inscription (663 AD) and the Neulpur copper-plate inscription (around the end of 8th century AD). The names of Brahmins, mentioned in the above inscriptions, in whose favour the Kings made grants had the surnames, which Barua says "now belong almost exclusively to the Bengali Kayasthas".
Historian D. R. Bhandarkar pointed out that these surnames were used by the Nagar Brahmins of Gujarat in the recent past. Enthoven says that "out of the thirteen Sharmans of the Nagars no less than ten are found as family names among the Kayasthas of Bengal". According to Barua, Alpine Aryans entered India as part of Aryan immigration during the third millennium BC. It has been suggested that the Nagar Brahmins along with the Bengali Kayasthas were originally the priests of the Alpines.
References
- ^ Sharma, Tej Ram (1978). Personal and Geographical Names in the Gupta Inscriptions. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. p. 115.
- ^ Wink 1991, p. 269.
- Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar (2004). Caste, Culture, and Hegemony: Social Dominance in Colonial Bengal. Sage Publications. p. 20. ISBN 81-7829-316-1.
- ^ Inden 1976, p. 1.
- ^ Inden 1976, p. 34.
- Inden 1976, p. 1-2.
- Indian Studies: Past & Present, Volume 10. University of California. 1969. p. 220.
- Sengupta, Nitish K. (2001). History of the Bengali-Speaking People. UBS Publishers' Distributors. p. 25. ISBN 81-7476-355-4.
- Gupta, Swarupa (2009). Notions of Nationhood in Bengal: Perspectives on Samaj, C. 1867-1905. Brill. pp. 103–104. ISBN 978-90-04-17614-0.
- Hopkins, Thomas J. (1989). "The Social and Religious Background for Transmission of Gaudiya Vaisnavism to the West". In Bromley, David G.; Shinn, Larry D. (eds.). Krishna consciousness in the West. Bucknell University Press. pp. 35–36. ISBN 978-0-8387-5144-2. Retrieved 2011-10-31.
- Inden 1976, p. 40.
- ^ S. K. Sharma, U. Sharma, ed. (2005). Discovery of North-East India: Geography, History, Culture, Religion, Politics, Sociology, Science, Education and Economy. North-East India. Volume 1. Mittal Publications. p. 182. ISBN 978-81-83-24035-2.
- S. K. Sharma, U. Sharma, ed. (2005). Discovery of North-East India: Geography, History, Culture, Religion, Politics, Sociology, Science, Education and Economy. North-East India. Volume 1. Mittal Publications. p. 46. ISBN 978-81-83-24035-2.
- R. E. Enthoven (1990). The Tribes and Castes of Bombay. Asian Educational Services. p. 235. ISBN 978-81-206-0630-2.
- S. K. Sharma, U. Sharma, ed. (2005). Discovery of North-East India: Geography, History, Culture, Religion, Politics, Sociology, Science, Education and Economy. North-East India. Volume 1. Mittal Publications. p. 176. ISBN 978-81-83-24035-2.
Sources
- Inden, Ronald B. (1976), Marriage and Rank in Bengali Culture: A History of Caste and Clan in Middle Period Bengal, University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-02569-1
- Wink, Andre (1991), Al-Hind, the Making of the Indo-Islamic World, Volume 1, Brill Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-90-04-09509-0, retrieved 3 September 2011