Misplaced Pages

User talk:Yajeepms: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:02, 24 December 2014 editGB fan (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators103,343 edits Reblocked indefinitely: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 16:04, 24 December 2014 edit undoOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators261,239 edits noNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
I disagree that my last unblock experience was "unproductive"; I quickly started work on another article almost straight away. I disagree that my last unblock experience was "unproductive"; I quickly started work on another article almost straight away.


{{unblock reviewed | 1=I am trying to create an article, but was interrupted. I accept what I have done. As per Misplaced Pages's ] to appealing blocks, I <br /> 1) Admit to it. <br /> 2) Propose to improve articles. <br /> 3) Will not do it again. <br /> 4) I am here to promote Austria.<br /> | decline = Based on your last comment below, you have made it clear that you do not intend to stop the behavior that led to the block. -- ] (]) 16:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed | 1=I am trying to create an article, but was interrupted. I accept what I have done. As per Misplaced Pages's ] to appealing blocks, I <br /> 1) Admit to it. <br /> 2) Propose to improve articles. <br /> 3) Will not do it again. <br /> 4) I am here to promote Austria.<br /> | decline = GB fan's achievements continue to mount, as now 18 hours has become indefinite. We have plenty of editors willing and capable of editing Austrian related content in a neutral manner. <b>] ]</b> 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)}}

In your , you pledged not to do it again. A half hour after an unblock, you were disruptive again. Why should we believe you this time that you won't "do it again"? ] (]) 13:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC) In your , you pledged not to do it again. A half hour after an unblock, you were disruptive again. Why should we believe you this time that you won't "do it again"? ] (]) 13:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)



Revision as of 16:04, 24 December 2014

Reblocked indefinitely

About a half hour after being unblocked by Edgar181, you decided to post this "WikiLove" message at the user talk page that led to your previous block. This kind of edit is completely and totally inappropriate, especially for someone who just came off a block for posting harassing/intimidating messages at that same user talk page. Since your disruptive behavior resumed almost immediately, I have restored an indefinite block on this account. As before, you can appeal the block using the unblock template, but note that you'll need a solid rationale; your previous unblock experience was a little disruptive and unproductive. only (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I disagree that my last unblock experience was "unproductive"; I quickly started work on another article almost straight away.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yajeepms (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am trying to create an article, but was interrupted. I accept what I have done. As per Misplaced Pages's guide to appealing blocks, I
1) Admit to it.
2) Propose to improve articles.
3) Will not do it again.
4) I am here to promote Austria.

Decline reason:

GB fan's achievements continue to mount, as now 18 hours has become indefinite. We have plenty of editors willing and capable of editing Austrian related content in a neutral manner. OhNoitsJamie 16:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In your last unblock request, you pledged not to do it again. A half hour after an unblock, you were disruptive again. Why should we believe you this time that you won't "do it again"? only (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I was congratulating User: Swpb. I will not congratulate him again.

There is absolutely no way that anyone would take your message to Swpb as anything positive. -- GB fan 15:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I clicked the send WikiLove button, therefore it is positive. I was congratulating him on suppressing Austrian culture on Misplaced Pages for under 18 hours, which is a fine achievement.

How you add something does not make something positive. It is the message that is sent that makes things positive. Your message to Swpb was not positive at all. Based on your attitude, don't expect to get unblocked anytime soon. -- GB fan 16:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)