Misplaced Pages

In the Sea of Sterile Mountains: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:47, 25 December 2014 editWhisperToMe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users662,777 edits Found online copy!← Previous edit Revision as of 07:34, 26 December 2014 edit undoSkookum1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled89,945 edits Reception: comment about POV lazy-review that content 'relies at random upon a very minute collection" is a very accurate description of the additions and creations of WMT, this claim does NOT mean those records and articles don't exist, jNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:
Robert L. Worden, the author of a book review written for '']'', wrote that despite some issues with methodology and minor errors, "Morton's book is a good presentation of how British Columbians reacted to the Chinese".<ref name=Wordenp48>Worden, p. 348.</ref> Robert L. Worden, the author of a book review written for '']'', wrote that despite some issues with methodology and minor errors, "Morton's book is a good presentation of how British Columbians reacted to the Chinese".<ref name=Wordenp48>Worden, p. 348.</ref>


Samantha J. Scott, the author of "Text as Discourse: The Chinese in Canada in Historiographical Perspective," criticized the lack of footnotes, the sourcing methodology, "explicit dialogue with previous texts," and the sourcing itself; Scott asserted that therefore "the conclusions drawn consequently appear unreliable."<ref name=Scottp75>Scott, p. 75.</ref> She argued, "Morton relies at random upon a very minute selection of newspaper articles and government records for which there is little accountability since the work is devoid of footnotes."<ref name=Scottp75/> Samantha J. Scott, the author of "Text as Discourse: The Chinese in Canada in Historiographical Perspective," criticized the lack of footnotes, the sourcing methodology, "explicit dialogue with previous texts," and the sourcing itself; Scott asserted that therefore "the conclusions drawn consequently appear unreliable."<ref name=Scottp75>Scott, p. 75.</ref> She argued, "Morton relies at random upon a very minute selection of newspaper articles and government records for which there is little accountability since the work is devoid of footnotes."<ref name=Scottp75/><!--which isn't to say that those articles and government records did not exist, this kind of review has unfortunate but typically biased POV overtones, "relies at random upon a very minute collection" of sources would be very well be said about the user who started this article, and who has resisted content from this book on the main Chinese Canadians in BC page; here he presumes to provide negative reviews instead of actually having read the book himself-->


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 07:34, 26 December 2014

In the Sea of Sterile Mountains: The Chinese in British Columbia is a 1974 book by James Morton, published by J. J. Douglas. It discusses the Chinese community in British Columbia from 1858 until 1971.

The book uses six documentaries and secondary sources total, while its remaining sources are newspaper articles and editorials.

Reception

Robert L. Worden, the author of a book review written for The Journal of Asian Studies, wrote that despite some issues with methodology and minor errors, "Morton's book is a good presentation of how British Columbians reacted to the Chinese".

Samantha J. Scott, the author of "Text as Discourse: The Chinese in Canada in Historiographical Perspective," criticized the lack of footnotes, the sourcing methodology, "explicit dialogue with previous texts," and the sourcing itself; Scott asserted that therefore "the conclusions drawn consequently appear unreliable." She argued, "Morton relies at random upon a very minute selection of newspaper articles and government records for which there is little accountability since the work is devoid of footnotes."

See also

References

Notes

  1. Worden, p. 347.
  2. Worden, p. 348.
  3. ^ Scott, p. 75.
Stub icon

This article about a book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: