| Revision as of 16:08, 3 January 2015 editRegistryKey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,350 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:29, 3 January 2015 edit undoKudpung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors109,255 edits →Oppose: opposeNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| =====Oppose===== | =====Oppose===== | ||
| #Sorry if this is going to soud blunt, but by ignoring every single piece of advice about running for adminship, including the in-your-face template that I toughened up only this afternoon, you do not inspire confidence that you will read and apply any policies, guidelines or other instructions and advice if you were to be a admin. FWIW, some advice you should have read are ] and ] and if you had, I'm sure we would not be here. Keep up the good work you have started, do some NPP and vandal patrol first, vote on some debates, RfA and AfD, and and come back to RfA when you have digested the criteria that the community generally expects from admin candidates. --] (]) 16:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| # | |||
| <!-- Please do not submit comments before the RfA starts. Feel free to remove this notice once the RfA has been transcluded. --> | |||
| =====Neutral===== | =====Neutral===== | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 3 January 2015
RegistryKey
Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (0/1/0); Scheduled to end 16:06, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination
RegistryKey (talk · contribs) – I would like to nominate myself for adminship to assist with the backlogs that are prevalent on Misplaced Pages all too often these days. While admittedly I do have less that 1,000 edits, I feel the niches I have chosen to take part in, such as CSD, identifying users for AIV, pending changes, etc. can only be better served by the tools available to me as an admin. RegistryKey 15:57, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: As mentioned in my nomination text, I plan to work in the areas of CSD, PROD, AfD, and problematic users such as disruptive users, promotional-only users and other anti-vandalism concepts. Additionally I plan to continue my work on Files For Upload, additionally with looking further into copyright issues there when they crop up.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Misplaced Pages, and why?
- A: Personally I feel that my best contribution was assisting the main editor of a scholarly journal update the cover of the publication he oversees. Being able to have that kind of impact on the global community really touched me. From a more general perspective, I would say my contributions have been consistently and efficiently identifying articles (and users) that do not need to be on Misplaced Pages, thus keeping it clean and easy to navigate, uncluttered with misinformation or unneeded information.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: None to my knowledge. Should I encounter these situations in the future, I understand the ideas of dealing with conflict at the lowest level through concepts such as discussion and when needed mediated discussion.
General comments
- Links for RegistryKey: RegistryKey (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for RegistryKey can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
| RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
Oppose
- Sorry if this is going to soud blunt, but by ignoring every single piece of advice about running for adminship, including the in-your-face template that I toughened up only this afternoon, you do not inspire confidence that you will read and apply any policies, guidelines or other instructions and advice if you were to be a admin. FWIW, some advice you should have read are here and here and if you had, I'm sure we would not be here. Keep up the good work you have started, do some NPP and vandal patrol first, vote on some debates, RfA and AfD, and and come back to RfA when you have digested the criteria that the community generally expects from admin candidates. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Neutral