| Revision as of 11:04, 7 January 2015 editMhhossein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,836 edits →Hello← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:24, 7 January 2015 edit undoP-123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,841 edits →Invitation to take part in an interview in The Bugle: Rmv 2 commas addedNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| == Invitation to take part in an interview in The Bugle == | == Invitation to take part in an interview in The Bugle == | ||
| Hi, I'm one of the editors of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter ], and I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview |
Hi, I'm one of the editors of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter ], and I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview with all the nominees for the 2014 Military History Newcomer Award which we're hoping to run in the January edition. If you're interested in participating, I'd appreciate it if you could post responses to some or all of the questions at ] by 11 January. I'm sorry for missing you in the invitations I sent out to the other nominees concerning this a few days ago - it was a complete oversight. Thank you, ] (]) 09:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:24, 7 January 2015
 Archives |
Hello
@Mhhossein: You can talk to me here! Do you have any other articles you would like me to look at? How is the Fourteen Infallibles article going? ~ P-123 (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, Yeah there are some articles, but I thought you can't do them because of being busy with other stuff. I'd like you to edit Hadith of Golden Chain as it was once nominated for GA and the reviewer rejected it because the language was not suitable. I should tell you that The Fourteen Infallibles is improving very slowly because almost no one is editing it! You were finished with that article, right? Mhhossein (talk) 07:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: Yes, I had finished with the Fourteen Infallibles, although I do not agree with a couple of Bapehu's edits (the wording), which he had changed from mine. Should I change them again? I will look at the other article. ~ P-123 (talk) 09:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
- 14 Infallibles has recently changed per former talks. Besides copy edits, you might help to have suitable materials in such a list! The staying of some parts are disputed. Mhhossein (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mhhossein: What do you mean by have suitable materials in such a list? There are sentences there now which do not make sense at all, which I will put on the Talk page, and part of the Lead is duplicated word for word in the first section! I will not be able to do anything with that, since as I say my knowledge of the subject is practically non-existent and I can only copy-edit what is there. ~ P-123 (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Suitable materials = every thing needed to make a list page! For example, when we are writing about the 14 infallibles, do we have to write about the status of infallibility? Mhhossein (talk) 08:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mhhossein: I am not sure what a list page is, but there are some aspects I think need expanding on in the article, to make things clearer for the reader. For example, how infallibility relates to Ismah, who the imams are (not the Twelve Imams) that are mentioned, who the infallibles are (as opposed to the Fourteen Infallibles). Should I put this on the Talk page? There is no section for this, and I'm not sure what the heading for this should be. As you will see from my note with link on the Talk page, that IP has been blocked for disruptive editing! ~ P-123 (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- I mean this by a list page. We should determine how much we should go through the details. Btw, I've pinged salman mahdi to answer the questions. Mhhossein (talk) 11:04, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mhhossein: I am not sure what a list page is, but there are some aspects I think need expanding on in the article, to make things clearer for the reader. For example, how infallibility relates to Ismah, who the imams are (not the Twelve Imams) that are mentioned, who the infallibles are (as opposed to the Fourteen Infallibles). Should I put this on the Talk page? There is no section for this, and I'm not sure what the heading for this should be. As you will see from my note with link on the Talk page, that IP has been blocked for disruptive editing! ~ P-123 (talk) 08:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Suitable materials = every thing needed to make a list page! For example, when we are writing about the 14 infallibles, do we have to write about the status of infallibility? Mhhossein (talk) 08:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Mhhossein: What do you mean by have suitable materials in such a list? There are sentences there now which do not make sense at all, which I will put on the Talk page, and part of the Lead is duplicated word for word in the first section! I will not be able to do anything with that, since as I say my knowledge of the subject is practically non-existent and I can only copy-edit what is there. ~ P-123 (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- 14 Infallibles has recently changed per former talks. Besides copy edits, you might help to have suitable materials in such a list! The staying of some parts are disputed. Mhhossein (talk) 12:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Mhhossein: Yes, I had finished with the Fourteen Infallibles, although I do not agree with a couple of Bapehu's edits (the wording), which he had changed from mine. Should I change them again? I will look at the other article. ~ P-123 (talk) 09:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Invitation to take part in an interview in The Bugle
Hi, I'm one of the editors of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter The Bugle, and I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview with all the nominees for the 2014 Military History Newcomer Award which we're hoping to run in the January edition. If you're interested in participating, I'd appreciate it if you could post responses to some or all of the questions at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/News/January 2015/Interview by 11 January. I'm sorry for missing you in the invitations I sent out to the other nominees concerning this a few days ago - it was a complete oversight. Thank you, Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)