| Revision as of 16:00, 9 January 2015 editFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,725 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Stepan Bandera. (TW) | Revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2015 edit undo176.195.15.246 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | ||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] |
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] | ||
| (]) 16:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :* Any positive and creative post supported by such a reliable source as President's of a respectfull country statement must not be deleted. Bandera's intention to murder each Pole from 16 to 60 speaks for itself. It downgrades him into a terrorist cathegory. It may not even be disputed at the Talk page. I shall revert all arbitrary censorship attemps regardless of any threats to block my edits as any attemp to hide truth about terrorism is criminal under any national law. Bandera had a jail sentence in Poland for terrorism too. As a hystorian I know what is proper and reliable and what is arbitrary. Audiatur et altera pars. Въ ] (]) 19:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:02, 9 January 2015
January 2015
Your recent editing history at Stepan Bandera shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian
(talk) 16:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Any positive and creative post supported by such a reliable source as President's of a respectfull country statement must not be deleted. Bandera's intention to murder each Pole from 16 to 60 speaks for itself. It downgrades him into a terrorist cathegory. It may not even be disputed at the Talk page. I shall revert all arbitrary censorship attemps regardless of any threats to block my edits as any attemp to hide truth about terrorism is criminal under any national law. Bandera had a jail sentence in Poland for terrorism too. As a hystorian I know what is proper and reliable and what is arbitrary. Audiatur et altera pars. Въ 176.195.15.246 (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)