| Revision as of 16:11, 31 May 2009 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits →May 2009: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:50, 20 January 2015 edit undoOiyarbepsy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers26,310 edits Don't need two pages with identical content | ||
| (42 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | #REDIRECT ] | ||
| {{/Header}} | |||
| {{talkpage}} | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| |format=Y/M | |||
| |age=1 | |||
| |index=no | |||
| |archivenow=(archivenow!) | |||
| }} | |||
| <!-- Messages without a ==Descriptive header== will be removed without being read--> | |||
| == May 2009 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:Continued disruption and outright deception including an attempt to trick a bureaucrat to granting admin rights |'''Continued disruption and outright deception including an attempt to trick a bureaucrat to granting admin rights '''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:true|] <small>(])</small> 15:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->] | |||
| :Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. ''']''' ] 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. , ], ] This is to end this and prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen on wiki. ] <small>(])</small> 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::The only reason PiratesmackK isn't already blocked is because he agreed to undergo a period of supervised editing and mentoring. I think something like this completely undermines the idea that he's trying to change. He was not blocked if he agreed to be a good user. He wasn't a good user. Therefore, he should be blocked. ] (]) 16:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Also see his Encyclopedia Dramatica efforts, replying to (remove the *, spamblacklist you see with something (which has now been hidden, odd, but User:Mentifisto will back me up on this) reading along the lines of "lol, I'm just enjoying the drama at the moment". ] (]) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *:I do note, however, that you were the original admin who brought him up at ANI and started the ball rolling. Considering your prior involvement (and I'm not suggesting you're biased against him, I'm suggesting others might say you are) perhaps you should bring this up at ANI and see if people approve of the block. ] (]) 16:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:50, 20 January 2015
Redirect to: