| Revision as of 23:01, 26 January 2015 editViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,592 edits →Tangential request: re← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:05, 26 January 2015 edit undoEEMIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,044 edits →Tangential requestNext edit → |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
Re. the JHunterJ note on ANI, and specifically characterizing a redirect I made: ''This was a blatant run-around the AfD close, and an obvious attempt to enforce his lone "delete"; '' - This is a tangent to your main point, but I don't appreciate the editorializing/hyopthesizing. I don't remember my rationale for the edit, but probably I'd completely forgotten about the previous AfD. Many of the my edits the last 4-5 years are planting redirects atop in-universe concepts, and it's not unknown for me to lose sight of a prior AfD. Anyway, two years is a long time to forget. My motive, lost to memory, is ultimately immaterial; I'd appreciate you excising the guesswork, which I think fails to ]. Thanks! --] (]) 22:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
Re. the JHunterJ note on ANI, and specifically characterizing a redirect I made: ''This was a blatant run-around the AfD close, and an obvious attempt to enforce his lone "delete"; '' - This is a tangent to your main point, but I don't appreciate the editorializing/hyopthesizing. I don't remember my rationale for the edit, but probably I'd completely forgotten about the previous AfD. Many of the my edits the last 4-5 years are planting redirects atop in-universe concepts, and it's not unknown for me to lose sight of a prior AfD. Anyway, two years is a long time to forget. My motive, lost to memory, is ultimately immaterial; I'd appreciate you excising the guesswork, which I think fails to ]. Thanks! --] (]) 22:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
:Can you explain why you redirected the article to a video game, using the rationale outlined at ]? It's pretty clear to the most uninvolved, reasonable user that regardless of the ''Star Trek'' topic, it cannot be a primary topic due to other uses of the term. ] (]) 23:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
:Can you explain why you redirected the article to a video game, using the rationale outlined at ]? It's pretty clear to the most uninvolved, reasonable user that regardless of the ''Star Trek'' topic, it cannot be a primary topic due to other uses of the term. ] (]) 23:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
::No. It was, what, 4 years ago? I have no idea what I was thinking. My best '''guess''' is that I simply wasn't aware of a more appropriate dab item in place now. Even today, I couldn't tell you anything about appropriate dab target/naming conventions; other than removing multiple bluelinks, dab-ness is simply not something I maintain/jump into. --] (]) 23:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC) |
Re. the JHunterJ note on ANI, and specifically characterizing a redirect I made: This was a blatant run-around the AfD close, and an obvious attempt to enforce his lone "delete"; - This is a tangent to your main point, but I don't appreciate the editorializing/hyopthesizing. I don't remember my rationale for the edit, but probably I'd completely forgotten about the previous AfD. Many of the my edits the last 4-5 years are planting redirects atop in-universe concepts, and it's not unknown for me to lose sight of a prior AfD. Anyway, two years is a long time to forget. My motive, lost to memory, is ultimately immaterial; I'd appreciate you excising the guesswork, which I think fails to assume good faith. Thanks! --EEMIV (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
