Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ashtul: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:31, 27 January 2015 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,530 edits Your AE request: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:47, 27 January 2015 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,842 edits Topic ban: new sectionNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:


Please do not again attempt to to attempt to win content disputes, or you may be sanctioned for abusing the process. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC) Please do not again attempt to to attempt to win content disputes, or you may be sanctioned for abusing the process. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

== Topic ban ==

In accordance with the discretionary sanctions authorised under ], you are hereby topic-banned from any article or discussion relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The proximate cause for the topic ban is your frivolous AE request against Nishidani in retaliation for a previous AE request he filed against you, but a review of your edits suggests to me that your conduct is likely to cause further problems in an already toxic topic area which needs coll heads, not edit-warring and tit-for-tat AE requests. This restriction is of an indefinite duration, but you may request reconsideration of this topic ban after no less than three months of unproblematic editing elsewhere. You may also appeal to ] or ] and failing that to the Arbitration Committee via the procedure described ]. ] &#124; ] 22:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 27 January 2015

Archiving icon
Archives

1


Warning

You are turning up consistently on pages where you have never edited, and I am a long term editor, to edit war. See WP:Hound. You are using sourcing that consistently violates WP:RS, as noted on talk pages and at the RSN; (c) your English is frequently bad (d) you do not read the whole page but add information that requires editors to revert it because the subject is already covered. etc.etc.etc.etc.

This incompetence and chasing after an editor to challenge him, esp. on articles dealing with settlers when you have a WP:COI, since some of your family are settled in the West Bank, looks like harassment. Basically it is sheer incompetence that if persisted in looks like a war of nerves attrition game. Please calm down, study how to edit Misplaced Pages productively, and take a break. The pattern, if indexed by diffs, looks damaging to your aspiration to edit here. I am patient, but I can't spend all day looking at the damage you make to articles through WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT, and if you persist in following me, introducing poor sources, and trying to force me to editwar I will have no option but to ask that administrators review the record and apply sanctions.Nishidani (talk) 14:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Nishidani, please stop these ridiculous warnings. You took out 0404 links with no other editor agreeing with you at the time.
As for WP:Hound, I told you, I will keep on checking your edits. I do not change, add or delete anything for the sake of annoying you, but edits like these are clear evidence that if anyone is to blame of WP:COI, it is you rather then me. Why write about the poor Palestinians in the next village in an article about a settlement? Don't make me laugh about WP:COI. Ashtul (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

See A/E

I'm sorry it has come to this but I am now reporting you for your 1R violation here . Nishidani (talk) 17:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

thanks for the warning. No hard feelings :) Ashtul (talk) 18:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello

May I ask if you have edited Misplaced Pages before, and if so, under what names? Huldra (talk) 22:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

You may and the answer is no.Ashtul (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, Huldra (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating Misplaced Pages:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction as documented in the related AE request, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.  Sandstein  09:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Appeal

{{unblock}}

Insofar as the appeal is directed to me, I decline it. Per Misplaced Pages:ARBPIA#General 1RR restriction, ""When in doubt, assume it is related" and "Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense". This pretty clearly leaves no leeway for error or warnings. I believe that a one-week block is of the appropriate length to serve as an incentive for you to exercise proper caution in the future.  Sandstein  11:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
I've copied the appeal to WP:AE, and commented there. PhilKnight (talk) 21:42, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Your appeal was declined. PhilKnight (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

2nd Appeal

{{unblock}}

Your AE request

Please do not again attempt to use arbitration enforcement to attempt to win content disputes, or you may be sanctioned for abusing the process. Thanks,  Sandstein  22:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Topic ban

In accordance with the discretionary sanctions authorised under WP:ARBPIA2, you are hereby topic-banned from any article or discussion relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict. The proximate cause for the topic ban is your frivolous AE request against Nishidani in retaliation for a previous AE request he filed against you, but a review of your edits suggests to me that your conduct is likely to cause further problems in an already toxic topic area which needs coll heads, not edit-warring and tit-for-tat AE requests. This restriction is of an indefinite duration, but you may request reconsideration of this topic ban after no less than three months of unproblematic editing elsewhere. You may also appeal to the administrators' noticeboard or the arbitration enforcement noticeboard and failing that to the Arbitration Committee via the procedure described here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)