| Revision as of 14:42, 6 February 2015 view sourceCyphoidbomb (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users166,474 edits →Warning escalation: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:43, 7 February 2015 view source JoesphBarbaro (talk | contribs)2,965 edits →Reverting: Fix.Next edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Hi JustPlane, I noticed your at this user's talk page. I think you're basically L4ing him for the same thing I L2'd him for. That is, the inappropriate summaries were made on Feb 1. He probably shouldn't receive a new warning unless there is a new offense. A sudden warning escalation for something that happened five days ago would be confusing, and would likely result in him lashing out again. I respectfully suggest you consider removing the warning. <small>(Also as a piece of unsolicited advice: I would probably avoid the "atrocious, childish, appalling, arrogant" language in the future, as it is personal-attack-y and would only serve to inflame whomever is receiving the warning.)</small> Thanks, and happy editing! ] (]) 14:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | Hi JustPlane, I noticed your at this user's talk page. I think you're basically L4ing him for the same thing I L2'd him for. That is, the inappropriate summaries were made on Feb 1. He probably shouldn't receive a new warning unless there is a new offense. A sudden warning escalation for something that happened five days ago would be confusing, and would likely result in him lashing out again. I respectfully suggest you consider removing the warning. <small>(Also as a piece of unsolicited advice: I would probably avoid the "atrocious, childish, appalling, arrogant" language in the future, as it is personal-attack-y and would only serve to inflame whomever is receiving the warning.)</small> Thanks, and happy editing! ] (]) 14:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Reverting == | |||
| You reverted my edits at both the ] and ] articles for literary no reason. How pity. What next? You're going to block me now? Oh, I'm so scared. These websites are mostly dead anyway. You're saying I'm arrogant, childish, and all that shit, but yet, you were the one who revered my edits for nothing and then saying "not needed". Who's being childish and arrogant now? How about you leave me the hell alone so I can return to editing without you getting in my way? No? How amusing. Take all of that smartass comments elsewhere. ] (]) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Another thing is that you don't even edit any of the ] articles, so how the hell are you going to revert my edits and then play the living ass out of me? ] (]) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:43, 7 February 2015
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JustPlaneEditing. |
 |
|
 Archives | |||
|
|||
Discussion
Please come to the WP:Cricket talk page to share your opinion about an ongoing discussion whether to add attendances in cricket articles or not. Please come there to share your views. Thanks :) Itz arka (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Warning escalation
Hi JustPlane, I noticed your recent warning at this user's talk page. I think you're basically L4ing him for the same thing I L2'd him for. That is, the inappropriate summaries were made on Feb 1. He probably shouldn't receive a new warning unless there is a new offense. A sudden warning escalation for something that happened five days ago would be confusing, and would likely result in him lashing out again. I respectfully suggest you consider removing the warning. (Also as a piece of unsolicited advice: I would probably avoid the "atrocious, childish, appalling, arrogant" language in the future, as it is personal-attack-y and would only serve to inflame whomever is receiving the warning.) Thanks, and happy editing! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Reverting
You reverted my edits at both the 3 train and List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes articles for literary no reason. How pity. What next? You're going to block me now? Oh, I'm so scared. These websites are mostly dead anyway. You're saying I'm arrogant, childish, and all that shit, but yet, you were the one who revered my edits for nothing and then saying "not needed". Who's being childish and arrogant now? How about you leave me the hell alone so I can return to editing without you getting in my way? No? How amusing. Take all of that smartass comments elsewhere. JoesphBarbaro (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Another thing is that you don't even edit any of the New York City Subway articles, so how the hell are you going to revert my edits and then play the living ass out of me? JoesphBarbaro (talk) 00:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)