Revision as of 06:23, 16 February 2015 editBrummfrosch (talk | contribs)104 editsm unify lit Wilson← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:41, 16 February 2015 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 editsm →Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: fmtNext edit → | ||
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' |
'''Low frequency noise''' is a phenomenon, or collection of phenomena, involving widespread reports of a persistent and invasive low-frequency humming, rumbling, or droning noise not audible to all people. It has been widely reported by national media in the UK and the United States. Colloquially, this may be referred to as, for example, the "] Hum" or the "] Hum". | ||
Data from a Taos |
Data from a Taos study suggests that around two percent of the population could detect the sound. For those who report hearing it, low frequency noise can be a very disturbing phenomenon, but there is skepticism about whether it exists as a physical phenomenon. | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
The essential element that defines |
The essential element that defines low frequency noise is what is perceived as a persistent low-frequency sound, often described as being comparable to that of a distant ] idling, or to some similar low-pitched sound for which obvious sources (e.g., household appliances, traffic noise, etc.) have been ruled out. | ||
For those who claim to hear it, this can be a very disturbing phenomenon and it has been linked to at least three suicides in the UK.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/jul/22/research.science3 |title=Humdinger |work=] |date=22 July 2004}}</ref> | |||
A study into the Taos Hum indicated that at least two percent could hear it; each hearer at a different frequency between 32 Hz and 80 Hz, modulated from 0.5 to 2 Hz.<ref name=mulmys /> Similar results have been found in an earlier British study.<ref name=Wilson>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=66VHTgzbIEUC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA868#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Mystery of people who hear the hum |work=New Scientist |date=13 December 1979 |pages=868–870}}</ref> It seems to be possible for hearers to move away from it, with one hearer of the Taos Hum reporting its range was 48 km.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20108651,00.html |title=Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...? |work=] |date=21 September 1992}}</ref> There are approximately equal percentages of male and female hearers.<ref name=mulmys/><ref name=Norfolk>{{cite web |url=http://amasci.com/hum/tinn2.txt |title=The Phenomenon of Low Frequency Hums |work=Norfolk Tinnitus Society |year=1993}}</ref> Age does appear to be a factor, with middle aged people being more likely to hear it.<ref name=deflow />{{rp|43}} | A study into the "Taos Hum" indicated that at least two percent could hear it; each hearer at a different frequency between 32 Hz and 80 Hz, modulated from 0.5 to 2 Hz.<ref name=mulmys /> Similar results have been found in an earlier British study.<ref name=Wilson>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=66VHTgzbIEUC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA868#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Mystery of people who hear the hum |work=New Scientist |date=13 December 1979 |pages=868–870}}</ref> It seems to be possible for hearers to move away from it, with one hearer of the "Taos Hum" reporting its range was 48 km.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20108651,00.html |title=Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...? |work=] |date=21 September 1992}}</ref> There are approximately equal percentages of male and female hearers.<ref name=mulmys/><ref name=Norfolk>{{cite web |url=http://amasci.com/hum/tinn2.txt |title=The Phenomenon of Low Frequency Hums |work=Norfolk Tinnitus Society |year=1993}}</ref> Age does appear to be a factor, with middle aged people being more likely to hear it.<ref name=deflow />{{rp|43}} | ||
There is skepticism about whether low frequency noise genuinely exists. In 2009, the head of audiology at ] in ], David Baguley, said he believed people's problems with low frequency noise were based on the physical world about one-third of the time, and stemmed from people focusing too keenly on innocuous background sounds the other two-thirds of the time. His current research focuses on using psychology and relaxation techniques to minimise the distress, which leads to a quieting or even removal of the noise.<ref name=bbchear>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8056284.stm |title=Have you heard 'the Hum'? |work=] |date=19 May 2009}}</ref> Leventhall, who prepared a report for the ] on the subject, similarly suggested that ] was effective: "It's a question of whether you tense up to the noise or are relaxed about it. The CBT was shown to work, by helping people to take a different attitude to it."<ref>{{cite news |title=Who, What, Why: Why is 'the hum' such a mystery? |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-13752688 |work=BBC News |date=13 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
There has been little mainstream attention. Only a handful of articles have been published in scientific literature, including: | There has been little mainstream attention. Only a handful of articles have been published in scientific literature, including: | ||
Leventhall, 2004,<ref name=levlfna>{{cite journal |last=Leventhall |first=H. G. |url=http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2004;volume=6;issue=23;spage=59;epage=72;aulast=Leventhall#ft46 |title=Low frequency noise and annoyance |journal=] |year=2004 |volume=6 |issue=23 |pages=59–72}}</ref> 2003;<ref name=deflow>{{cite web |url=http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/4141/1/Benton_2003.pdf |title=A Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects |work=] |date=May 2003}}</ref> | Leventhall, 2004,<ref name=levlfna>{{cite journal |last=Leventhall |first=H. G. |url=http://www.noiseandhealth.org/article.asp?issn=1463-1741;year=2004;volume=6;issue=23;spage=59;epage=72;aulast=Leventhall#ft46 |title=Low frequency noise and annoyance |journal=] |year=2004 |volume=6 |issue=23 |pages=59–72}}</ref> 2003;<ref name=deflow>{{cite web |url=http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/4141/1/Benton_2003.pdf |title=A Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects |work=] |date=May 2003}}</ref> | ||
Cowan, 2003;<ref name=acenfin>{{cite journal |last=Cowan |first=J. P. |title=The Kokomo Hum investigation |url=http://www.johndawes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/kokomo1.pdf |journal=Acentech Project No. 615411 |date=October 2003 |location=Cambridge, MA |publisher=Accentech Incorporated}}</ref> | |||
Mullins & Kelly, 1998, 1995;<ref name=mulmys>{{cite web |url=http://acousticalsociety.org/sites/default/files/docs/echoes/v5n3.pdf |title=The mystery of the Taos hum |work=] |date=Autumn 1995}}</ref> | Mullins & Kelly, 1998, 1995;<ref name=mulmys>{{cite web |url=http://acousticalsociety.org/sites/default/files/docs/echoes/v5n3.pdf |title=The mystery of the Taos hum |work=] |date=Autumn 1995}}</ref> | ||
Broner, 1978;<ref name=broner1978>{{cite journal |last=Broner |first=N. |title=The effects of low frequency noise on people—A review |journal=] |year=1978 |volume=58 |pages=483–500 |doi=10.1016/0022-460x(78)90354-1}}</ref> | Broner, 1978;<ref name=broner1978>{{cite journal |last=Broner |first=N. |title=The effects of low frequency noise on people—A review |journal=] |year=1978 |volume=58 |pages=483–500 |doi=10.1016/0022-460x(78)90354-1}}</ref> | ||
Vasudevan & Gordon, 1977.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vasudevan |first1=R. N. |last2=Gordon |first2=C. G. |title=Experimental study of annoyance due to low frequency environmental noise |journal=] |year=1997 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=57–69}}</ref> | Vasudevan & Gordon, 1977.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vasudevan |first1=R. N. |last2=Gordon |first2=C. G. |title=Experimental study of annoyance due to low frequency environmental noise |journal=] |year=1997 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=57–69}}</ref> | ||
Others publications include: | Others publications include: | ||
Frosch, 2013,<ref name=frosch>{{ cite journal |last=Frosch |first=F. G. |url=http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/95335020/hum-otoacoustic-emissions-may-arise-out-same-mechanisms |title=Hum and otoacoustic emissions may arise out of the same mechanisms |journal=] |year=2013 |volume=27 |issue=4 |pages=603–624}}</ref> | |||
Deming, 2004;<ref name=Deming2004>{{cite journal |last=Deming |first=David |url=http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_18_4_deming.pdf |title=The Hum: An anomalous sound heard around the world |journal=Journal of Scientific Exploration |year=2004 |volume=18 |issue=4 |pages=571–594}}</ref> | |||
Fox, 1989;<ref>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=b3Xqfc2KRo8C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA27#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Low-frequency 'hum' may permeate the environment |work=] |date=9 December 1989 |pages=27}}</ref> | |||
Wilson, 1979;<ref name=Wilson/> | Wilson, 1979;<ref name=Wilson/> | ||
Hanlon, 1973.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=i145R0bZXMYC&pg=PP415&hl#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Can some people hear the jet stream? |work=New Scientist |date=8 November 1973 |pages=415–416}}</ref> | Hanlon, 1973.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=i145R0bZXMYC&pg=PP415&hl#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Can some people hear the jet stream? |work=New Scientist |date=8 November 1973 |pages=415–416}}</ref> | ||
The World Hum Database and Mapping Project was launched in December 2012, in order to build detailed mappings of hum locations and to provide a database of Hum-related data for professional and independent researchers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehum.info/ |title=The World Hum Map and Database |work=World Hum Database and Mapping Project}}</ref> | |||
<!-- | |||
Reported hums from around the world, by date first reported: | |||
===Auckland, New Zealand (1977)=== | |||
The ] Hum was first reported in 1977.<ref>{{cite av media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdqZWTa8cPU |title=CAMPBELL LIVE North Shore Hum Auckland New-Zealand |work=] |time=1:16 |date=5 September 2013}}</ref> It is apparently focused on the ], although it has also been reported in the east of the city. Tom Moir of ] started investigating in 2006. He has reached no definitive conclusions, but the data led him to suggest that it was not related to the electricity mains, common communication devices (e.g. mobile phones, wi-fi, police radio) or military projects. He found that it behaved like a natural phenomena and that it became stronger at lower air pressures. Describing the noise as sounding like blowing over a bottle, he noted that most of the houses were located in dips in the ground.<ref name="Auckland North Shore Hum"/> | |||
He claims to have made a recording of the hum.<ref name=srmoir /> | |||
===Bristol, England, UK (1979)=== | |||
In Britain, the most famous example was the Bristol Hum that made headlines in the late 1970s.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8056284.stm |title=Have you heard 'the Hum'? |work=BBC News |date=2009-05-19}}</ref> 800 people reported hearing it and it was eventually blamed on traffic and factories in Avonmouth.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/27/hum-heard-world-video_n_3663631.html |title=Hum Heard Around World Impacts 2 Percent Of People In Hum-Prone Areas, Study Suggests |work=] |date=27 July 2013}}</ref> | |||
===Taos, New Mexico, US (1992)=== | |||
Complaints from many citizens living near the town of ] started in 1992 and led to the ] undertaking studies of hum sufferers in 1993.<ref name=latrea>{{cite web |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1993-09-01/news/mn-30113_1_taos-hum |title=In Taos, Researchers Can Hum It, but They Can't Name That Sound |work=] |date=1 September 1993}}</ref> In one of their tests, hearers were asked to match their Hum with a sound generator, resulting in frequencies ranging from 32 Hz to 80 Hz with modulation frequencies from 0.5 to 2 Hz. The researchers could find no acoustic, seismic or electromagnetic sources that might account for the hum.<ref name=mulmys/> Their final conclusion was that it stems from an ear condition involving spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, where a noise is generated inside the ear.<ref name=albear>{{cite web |url=http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/268257nm12-09-07.htm |title=Taoseños' Ears Still Humming |work=] |date=9 December 2007}}</ref> | |||
The Taos Hum was featured on the TV show '']'',<ref name=unsolve>{{cite web |url=http://www.amazon.com/Unsolved-Mysteries-Ghosts-Robert-Stack/dp/B0002DRE0O |title=Unsolved Mysteries: Ghosts (2005) |work=] |at=Disc 4, "Mystery Hum"}}</ref> and it was also briefly mentioned in an episode of '']''.<ref name=nprtiny>{{cite news |url=http://www.npr.org/2011/06/15/137205551/english-village-cant-figure-out-whats-causing-that-hum |title=In A Tiny English Town, A 'Hum' Pierces Each Night |work=] |date=15 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
===Kokomo, Indiana, US (1999)=== | |||
Kokomo, a city of 47,000, allocated $100,000 in 2002 to investigate a hum after nearly 100 complaints were made since 1999. Some sufferers blamed physical symptoms on the hum, including headaches, nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and joint pain, with one reporting that her health improved when she moved out of the town.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/23/national/23KOKO.html |title=Hum Haunts Indiana City; Its Source Is a Mystery |work=] |date=23 June 2002}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yekCAAAAMBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=The Kokomo Hum |work=] |date=December 2002 |pages=157–163, 188–194}}</ref> In November 2002, acoustic consultants Acentech was hired by the Board of Public Works and Safety of the City of Kokomo to investigate the Hum. | |||
The Acentech investigation found no evidence of ground-borne vibrations within the extremes of human perception. Its investigation of acoustic sources located two sounds that were 20 decibels above background, with frequencies of 36 and 10 hertz. The first was a ] at the local ] ] plant emitting a 36 hertz tone, the second was an ] intake at the ] plant emitting a 10 hertz tone.<ref name=acenfin /> However, even after these noises were addressed to the satisfaction of the consultant, residents still reported hearing the hum.<ref name=koknot>{{cite web |url=http://newspaperarchive.com/us/indiana/kokomo/kokomo-tribune/2004/06-03/ |title=Expert says hum is not a sound |work=] |date=3 June 2004 |pages=1&12}}</ref><ref name=humnot>{{cite web |url=https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/humforum/conversations/topics/990 |title=Expert says hum is not a sound |work=Hum Forum |date=3 June 2004}}</ref> | |||
===Calgary, Alberta, Canada (2008)=== | |||
Investigation of the Ranchlands hum began in 2008. Marcia Epstein, an acoustic ecologist at the ] who is investigating in her spare time, said that whilst there were a variety of tones, there was a concentration of frequencies around 40 hertz,<ref name=cbcran>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/story/2011/09/29/calgary-buzz-ranchlands.html |title=Ranchlands hum eludes residents two years on |work=] |date=29 September 2011}}</ref> sometimes described as a "vibrational feeling",<ref name=metpro>{{cite news |url=http://metronews.ca/news/edmonton/692733/probe-of-unexplained-humming-noise-widens-past-calgary/ |title=Probe of unexplained humming noise widens past Calgary |work=] |date=7 June 2013}}</ref> affecting "12 to 20 per cent of the community."<ref name=cbcran /> The investigation was ongoing in 2013.<ref name=metpro /> | |||
===Windsor, Ontario, Canada (2009)=== | |||
This phenomenon, first noticed in 2009, has also been reported since 2011 throughout ] and ] County in ].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www2.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=87a6186f-d849-4656-825f-8482ae91da99 |title=Rumblings may prompt lawsuit |work=] |date=5 August 2011}}</ref> A 2011 study by ] indicated that it may be originating from the heavily industrialised ] area on the US side of the Detroit river.<ref name=onefur>{{cite web |url=http://www.onearth.org/article/the-sound-and-the-fury |title=The Sound and the Fury |work=] |date=24 June 2013}}</ref> A two-hour telephone town hall meeting in 2012 received calls from 13,000 residents, with another 9,000 leaving comments over the next week, although not all of those were from people who could hear the hum.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2012/02/23/22000-residents-dial-in-to-windsor-hum-telephone-town-hall/ |title=22,000 residents dial in to Windsor hum telephone town hall |work=Windsor Star |date=23 February 2012}}</ref> | |||
In 2013 the Canadian Government allocated $60,000 for research by the ] to determine the source of the noise.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/story/2013/01/21/wdr-windsor-hum-university-windsor-announcement.html |title=Windsor's mysterious hum research to be funded by Ottawa |work=CBC News |date=21 Jan 2013}}</ref> A report released in 2014 confirmed the origin as being from Zug Island, though the precise cause of the noise has not been determined. A ] blast furnace on the island was hypothesised to be the source.<ref name=winzug>{{cite web |url=http://windsorite.ca/2014/05/breaking-news-the-windsor-hum-is-real/ |title=Report: Windsor Hum Likely From Zug Island "Blast Furnace Operations" |work=windsoriteDOTca |date=23 May 2014}}</ref> Meetings with U.S. officials and U.S. Steel to discuss the study have begun.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/windsor-hum-talks-begin-with-river-rouge-and-u-s-steel-1.2728543 |title=Windsor Hum talks begin with River Rouge and U.S. Steel |work=CBC News |date=5 August 2014}}</ref> | |||
===Woodland, England, UK (2011)=== | |||
In June 2011, residents of the small rural village of ] reported experiencing a hum that had already lasted for over two months.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/in-search-of-the-thing-that-goes-hum-in-the-night-2299300.html |title=In search of the thing that goes hum in the night |work=] |date=18 June 2011}}</ref> It has been suggested that disused mine shafts in the area are the main culprit.<ref name=advans>{{cite web |url=http://www.theadvertiserseries.co.uk/news/9210463.Expert_has_the_answer_to_village_hums/ |title=Expert has the answer to Woodland village hums |work=] |date=23 August 2011}}</ref> | |||
===Beaufort, County Kerry, Ireland (2012)=== | |||
The Hum has also frustrated residents in ].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/the-hum-leaves-village-ears-ringing-185609.html |title=‘The Hum’ leaves village ears ringing |work=] |date=1 March 2012}}</ref> This led to it being raised in the Irish ] by ], who personally heard the Hum.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/locals-despair-as-the-hum-makes-life-a-living-hell-189224.html |title=Locals despair as ‘The Hum’ makes life a living hell |work=Irish Examiner |date=3 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
===Seattle, Washington, US (2012)=== | |||
The "West Seattle Hum" in ] was first reported in the media in 2012, although residents stated that they had heard it in previous years.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ksdk.com/news/world/article/336859/28/Mysterious-hum-keeping-Seattle-residents-awake-at-night |title=Mysterious hum in Seattle |work=] |date=6 September 2012}}</ref> One suggested culprit was the mating call of the ],<ref name=hufmid>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/07/seattle-hum-fish-midshipman_n_1865742.html |title=Seattle 'Hum' May Be Due To Midshipman Fish That Produce Sound For Mating |work=] |date=7 September 2012}}</ref> although the ] researcher involved determined that this was not the case in Seattle.<ref name=wsbnot>{{cite web |url=http://westseattleblog.com/2012/09/west-seattles-now-famous-hum-apparently-not-a-fishs-fault/ |title=West Seattle’s now-famous ‘Hum’: Apparently NOT a fish’s fault |work=] |date=11 September 2012}}</ref> Local businesses from the ] area worked with the ] to isolate and eliminate the noise, which was determined to be coming from equipment used to offload cargo from ships.<ref name=wsboff>{{cite web |url=http://westseattleblog.com/2012/09/the-hum-ship-offloading-suspected-in-latest-recurrence/ |title=‘The Hum’: Ship offloading suspected in latest recurrence |work=West Seattle Blog |date=26 September 2012}}</ref><ref name=wsbsec>{{cite web |url=http://westseattleblog.com/2012/12/the-hum-followup-calportland-installs-second-silencer-hopes-thats-the-fix/ |title=‘The Hum’ followup: CalPortland installs second silencer, hopes that’s the fix |work=West Seattle Blog |date=7 December 2012}}</ref> | |||
===Wellington, New Zealand (2012)=== | |||
On 8 October 2012 the city council of ] started to receive complaints about a mysterious hum.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Wellington-hum-becomes-nationwide-obsession/tabid/423/articleID/272369/Default.aspx |title=Wellington 'hum' becomes nationwide obsession |work=3 News |date=11 October 2012}}</ref> A council investigation failed to locate the source of the noise, with the investigators failing to even hear the hum. It disappeared shortly after it was first reported. The council advanced the theory that the source was a ] that had arrived in Wellington the day before the first complaint was received.<ref name=3newdis>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Wellington-hum-disappears/tabid/423/articleID/272915/Default.aspx |title=Wellington hum disappears |work=3 News |date=16 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=3newsin>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Singapores-frigate-Stalwart-source-of-Wellington-hum/tabid/423/articleID/272401/Default.aspx |title=Singapore's frigate 'Stalwart' source of Wellington hum? |work=3 News |date=11 October 2012}}</ref> | |||
--> | |||
==Possible explanations== | ==Possible explanations== | ||
:''See also: ]'' | |||
===Mechanical devices=== | ===Mechanical devices=== | ||
Although an obvious candidate, given the common description of the hum as sounding like a diesel engine, the majority of reported hums have not been traced to a specific mechanical source. | Although an obvious candidate, given the common description of the hum as sounding like a diesel engine, the majority of reported hums have not been traced to a specific mechanical source. | ||
In the case of ], a city with heavy industry, the origin of |
In the case of ], a city with heavy industry, the origin of noise reports was thought to have been traced to two sources. The first was a 36 hertz tone from a cooling tower at the local DaimlerChrysler casting plant and the second was a 10 hertz tone from an air compressor intake at the Haynes International plant. After those devices were corrected, however, reports of the hum persisted.<ref name=koknot>{{cite web |url=http://newspaperarchive.com/us/indiana/kokomo/kokomo-tribune/2004/06-03/ |title=Expert says hum is not a sound |work=] |date=3 June 2004 |pages=1&12}}</ref><ref name=humnot>{{cite web |url=https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/humforum/conversations/topics/990 |title=Expert says hum is not a sound |work=Hum Forum |date=3 June 2004}}</ref> | ||
Two hums have been linked to mechanical sources. The ] was traced to a vacuum pump used by CalPortland to offload cargo from ships. After CalPortland replaced the silencers on the machine, reports of the hum ceased.<ref name=wsbsec>{{cite web |url=http://westseattleblog.com/2012/12/the-hum-followup-calportland-installs-second-silencer-hopes-thats-the-fix/ |title=‘The Hum’ followup: CalPortland installs second silencer, hopes that’s the fix |work=West Seattle Blog |date=7 December 2012}}</ref> Likewise, the ] is thought to have been due to the diesel generator on a visiting ship.<ref name=3newdis>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Wellington-hum-disappears/tabid/423/articleID/272915/Default.aspx |title=Wellington hum disappears |work=3 News |date=16 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=3newsin>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Singapores-frigate-Stalwart-source-of-Wellington-hum/tabid/423/articleID/272401/Default.aspx |title=Singapore's frigate 'Stalwart' source of Wellington hum? |work=3 News |date=11 October 2012}}</ref> A third hum in ] is likely to have originated from a steelworks on the industrial zone of Zug Island.<ref name=winzug>{{cite web |url=http://windsorite.ca/2014/05/breaking-news-the-windsor-hum-is-real/ |title=Report: Windsor Hum Likely From Zug Island "Blast Furnace Operations" |work=windsoriteDOTca |date=23 May 2014}}</ref> | Two hums have been linked to mechanical sources. The ] was traced to a vacuum pump used by CalPortland to offload cargo from ships. After CalPortland replaced the silencers on the machine, reports of the hum ceased.<ref name=wsbsec>{{cite web |url=http://westseattleblog.com/2012/12/the-hum-followup-calportland-installs-second-silencer-hopes-thats-the-fix/ |title=‘The Hum’ followup: CalPortland installs second silencer, hopes that’s the fix |work=West Seattle Blog |date=7 December 2012}}</ref> Likewise, the ] is thought to have been due to the diesel generator on a visiting ship.<ref name=3newdis>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Wellington-hum-disappears/tabid/423/articleID/272915/Default.aspx |title=Wellington hum disappears |work=3 News |date=16 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=3newsin>{{cite web |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/Singapores-frigate-Stalwart-source-of-Wellington-hum/tabid/423/articleID/272401/Default.aspx |title=Singapore's frigate 'Stalwart' source of Wellington hum? |work=3 News |date=11 October 2012}}</ref> A third hum in ] is likely to have originated from a steelworks on the industrial zone of Zug Island.<ref name=winzug>{{cite web |url=http://windsorite.ca/2014/05/breaking-news-the-windsor-hum-is-real/ |title=Report: Windsor Hum Likely From Zug Island "Blast Furnace Operations" |work=windsoriteDOTca |date=23 May 2014}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | ===Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions=== | ||
===Tinnitus=== | |||
A suggested diagnosis of ], a disturbance of the auditory system, is used by some physicians in response to complaints about The Hum. Tinnitus is generated internally by the auditory and nervous systems, with no external stimulus. However, the theory that the Hum is actually tinnitus fails to explain why the Hum can be heard only at certain geographical locations, to the degree those reports are accurate. There may exist individual differences as to the threshold of perception of acoustic or non-acoustic stimuli, or other normal individual variations that could contribute to the perception of the Hum by some people in the population and not by others. | |||
While the Hum is hypothesized by some to be a form of low frequency tinnitus<ref name=Norfolk/> such as the ], some sufferers claim it is not internal, being worse inside their homes than outside. However, others insist that it is equally bad indoors and outdoors. Some people notice the Hum only at home, while others hear it everywhere they go. Some sufferers report that it is made worse by soundproofing (e.g., ]), which serves only to decrease other environmental noise, thus making the Hum more apparent.<ref name=advans>{{cite web |url=http://www.theadvertiserseries.co.uk/news/9210463.Expert_has_the_answer_to_village_hums/ |title=Expert has the answer to Woodland village hums |work=] |date=23 August 2011}}</ref> | |||
People who both suffer from tinnitus and hear the Hum describe them as qualitatively different, and many hum sufferers can find locations where they do not hear the hum at all {{citation needed|reason=Speculation?|date=February 2015}}. | |||
⚫ | |||
Human ears generate their own noises, called spontaneous ]s, which affect between 38 percent to 60 percent of people, although the majority are unaware of these sounds.<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Mb6AqNWGDvEC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA32#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Tinnitus: A Multidisciplinary Approach |work=] |year=2013 |ISBN=1-86156-403-1 |page=32}}</ref> The people who hear these sounds typically hear a faint buzzing or ringing, especially if they are otherwise in complete silence.<ref>{{cite web |last=Abrams |first=M. |title=An Inescapable Buzz |work=] |date=October 1995 |page=20}}</ref> | Human ears generate their own noises, called spontaneous ]s, which affect between 38 percent to 60 percent of people, although the majority are unaware of these sounds.<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Mb6AqNWGDvEC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA32#v=onepage&q&f=false |title=Tinnitus: A Multidisciplinary Approach |work=] |year=2013 |ISBN=1-86156-403-1 |page=32}}</ref> The people who hear these sounds typically hear a faint buzzing or ringing, especially if they are otherwise in complete silence.<ref>{{cite web |last=Abrams |first=M. |title=An Inescapable Buzz |work=] |date=October 1995 |page=20}}</ref> | ||
Researchers who looked at the Taos Hum considered otoacoustic emissions as a possibility,<ref name=latrea>{{cite web |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1993-09-01/news/mn-30113_1_taos-hum |title=In Taos, Researchers Can Hum It, but They Can't Name That Sound |work=] |date=1 September 1993}}</ref> and eventually concluded that this was likely the case.<ref name=albear>{{cite web |url=http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/268257nm12-09-07.htm |title=Taoseños' Ears Still Humming |work=] |date=9 December 2007}}</ref |
Researchers who looked at the Taos Hum considered otoacoustic emissions as a possibility,<ref name=latrea>{{cite web |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1993-09-01/news/mn-30113_1_taos-hum |title=In Taos, Researchers Can Hum It, but They Can't Name That Sound |work=] |date=1 September 1993}}</ref> and eventually concluded that this was likely the case.<ref name=albear>{{cite web |url=http://www.abqjournal.com/news/state/268257nm12-09-07.htm |title=Taoseños' Ears Still Humming |work=] |date=9 December 2007}}</ref> | ||
===Fish=== | ===Fish=== |
Revision as of 13:41, 16 February 2015
Low frequency noise is a phenomenon, or collection of phenomena, involving widespread reports of a persistent and invasive low-frequency humming, rumbling, or droning noise not audible to all people. It has been widely reported by national media in the UK and the United States. Colloquially, this may be referred to as, for example, the "Bristol Hum" or the "Taos Hum".
Data from a Taos study suggests that around two percent of the population could detect the sound. For those who report hearing it, low frequency noise can be a very disturbing phenomenon, but there is skepticism about whether it exists as a physical phenomenon.
Description
The essential element that defines low frequency noise is what is perceived as a persistent low-frequency sound, often described as being comparable to that of a distant diesel engine idling, or to some similar low-pitched sound for which obvious sources (e.g., household appliances, traffic noise, etc.) have been ruled out.
For those who claim to hear it, this can be a very disturbing phenomenon and it has been linked to at least three suicides in the UK.
A study into the "Taos Hum" indicated that at least two percent could hear it; each hearer at a different frequency between 32 Hz and 80 Hz, modulated from 0.5 to 2 Hz. Similar results have been found in an earlier British study. It seems to be possible for hearers to move away from it, with one hearer of the "Taos Hum" reporting its range was 48 km. There are approximately equal percentages of male and female hearers. Age does appear to be a factor, with middle aged people being more likely to hear it.
There is skepticism about whether low frequency noise genuinely exists. In 2009, the head of audiology at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, David Baguley, said he believed people's problems with low frequency noise were based on the physical world about one-third of the time, and stemmed from people focusing too keenly on innocuous background sounds the other two-thirds of the time. His current research focuses on using psychology and relaxation techniques to minimise the distress, which leads to a quieting or even removal of the noise. Leventhall, who prepared a report for the UK government on the subject, similarly suggested that cognitive behavioural therapy was effective: "It's a question of whether you tense up to the noise or are relaxed about it. The CBT was shown to work, by helping people to take a different attitude to it."
History
There has been little mainstream attention. Only a handful of articles have been published in scientific literature, including: Leventhall, 2004, 2003; Mullins & Kelly, 1998, 1995; Broner, 1978; Vasudevan & Gordon, 1977. Others publications include: Wilson, 1979; Hanlon, 1973.
Possible explanations
- See also: infrasound
Mechanical devices
Although an obvious candidate, given the common description of the hum as sounding like a diesel engine, the majority of reported hums have not been traced to a specific mechanical source.
In the case of Kokomo, Indiana, a city with heavy industry, the origin of noise reports was thought to have been traced to two sources. The first was a 36 hertz tone from a cooling tower at the local DaimlerChrysler casting plant and the second was a 10 hertz tone from an air compressor intake at the Haynes International plant. After those devices were corrected, however, reports of the hum persisted.
Two hums have been linked to mechanical sources. The West Seattle Hum was traced to a vacuum pump used by CalPortland to offload cargo from ships. After CalPortland replaced the silencers on the machine, reports of the hum ceased. Likewise, the Wellington Hum is thought to have been due to the diesel generator on a visiting ship. A third hum in Windsor is likely to have originated from a steelworks on the industrial zone of Zug Island.
Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions
Human ears generate their own noises, called spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, which affect between 38 percent to 60 percent of people, although the majority are unaware of these sounds. The people who hear these sounds typically hear a faint buzzing or ringing, especially if they are otherwise in complete silence.
Researchers who looked at the Taos Hum considered otoacoustic emissions as a possibility, and eventually concluded that this was likely the case.
Fish
One of the possible causes of the West Seattle Hum considered was that it was related to the midshipman fish, also known as a toadfish. A previous hum in Sausalito, California, also on the west coast of the United States, was determined to be the mating call of the male midshipman. However, in that case the hum was resonating through houseboat hulls and affecting the people living on those boats. In the West Seattle case, the University of Washington researcher determined that it would be impossible for any resonating hum, transmitted via tanker or boat hulls, to be transmitted very far inland; certainly not far enough to account for the reports.
The Scottish Association for Marine Science hypothesised that the nocturnal humming sound heard in Hythe, Hampshire in the UK could be produced by a similar "sonic" fish. The council believed this to be unlikely because such fish are not commonly found in inshore waters of the UK. As of February 2014 the source had not been located, although the sound has now been recorded.
Media coverage
The Taos Hum was featured on the TV show Unsolved Mysteries. It was also featured in LiveScience's "Top Ten Unexplained Phenomena", where it took tenth place.
In popular culture
In a 1998 episode of The X-Files titled "Drive", Agent Mulder speculates that extremely low frequency (ELF) radio waves "may be behind the so-called Taos Hum".
See also
References
- "Humdinger". The Guardian. 22 July 2004.
- ^ "The mystery of the Taos hum" (PDF). Acoustical Society of America. Autumn 1995.
- ^ "Mystery of people who hear the hum". New Scientist. 13 December 1979. pp. 868–870.
- "Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...?". People. 21 September 1992.
- "The Phenomenon of Low Frequency Hums". Norfolk Tinnitus Society. 1993.
- ^ "A Review of Published Research on Low Frequency Noise and its Effects" (PDF). Defra. May 2003.
- "Have you heard 'the Hum'?". BBC News. 19 May 2009.
- "Who, What, Why: Why is 'the hum' such a mystery?". BBC News. 13 June 2011.
- Leventhall, H. G. (2004). "Low frequency noise and annoyance". Noise & Health. 6 (23): 59–72.
- Broner, N. (1978). "The effects of low frequency noise on people—A review". Journal of Sound and Vibration. 58: 483–500. doi:10.1016/0022-460x(78)90354-1.
- Vasudevan, R. N.; Gordon, C. G. (1997). "Experimental study of annoyance due to low frequency environmental noise". Applied Acoustics. 10 (1): 57–69.
- "Can some people hear the jet stream?". New Scientist. 8 November 1973. pp. 415–416.
- "Expert says hum is not a sound". Kokomo Tribune. 3 June 2004. pp. 1&12.
- "Expert says hum is not a sound". Hum Forum. 3 June 2004.
- "'The Hum' followup: CalPortland installs second silencer, hopes that's the fix". West Seattle Blog. 7 December 2012.
- "Wellington hum disappears". 3 News. 16 October 2012.
- "Singapore's frigate 'Stalwart' source of Wellington hum?". 3 News. 11 October 2012.
- "Report: Windsor Hum Likely From Zug Island "Blast Furnace Operations"". windsoriteDOTca. 23 May 2014.
- Tinnitus: A Multidisciplinary Approach. 2013. p. 32. ISBN 1-86156-403-1.
{{cite book}}
:|work=
ignored (help) - Abrams, M. (October 1995). "An Inescapable Buzz". Discover Magazine. p. 20.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|url=
(help) - "In Taos, Researchers Can Hum It, but They Can't Name That Sound". LA Times. 1 September 1993.
- "Taoseños' Ears Still Humming". Albuquerque Journal. 9 December 2007.
- "Seattle 'Hum' May Be Due To Midshipman Fish That Produce Sound For Mating". The Huffington Post. 7 September 2012.
- "Humming Toadfish Are the Buzz of Sausalito". NBC. 16 June 1986.
- "West Seattle's now-famous 'Hum': Apparently NOT a fish's fault". West Seattle Blog. 11 September 2012.
- "Mystery hum keeping people awake may be love-making fish". The Daily Telegraph. 23 October 2013.
- "Southampton Water mystery droning prompts more moaning". BBC News. 24 October 2013.
- "Minutes of a meeting of the New Forest Environmental Protection Liaison Committee" (PDF). New Forest District Council. 7 February 2014. p. 4.
- "Unsolved Mysteries: Ghosts (2005)". Amazon.com. Disc 4, "Mystery Hum".
- "Spooky! The Top 10 Unexplained Phenomena". LiveScience. 10 January 2007.
- "In A Tiny English Town, A 'Hum' Pierces Each Night". NPR. 15 June 2011.
- "Drive". Ten Thirteen Productions. The X Files. November 15, 1998. Event occurs at 40:00.
Further reading
- "What's that noise?". The Guardian. October 18, 2001.
- Moorhouse, Andy; Waddington, David; Adams, Mags (February 2005). "Procedure for the assessment of low frequency noise complaints" (PDF). Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford.
- Leventhall, Geoff. "Coping Strategies". Defra.
- especially "Development of a course in computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy" (PDF). 2009.
- and "Coping Strategies for Low Frequency Noise" (PDF). 2008.