| Revision as of 12:11, 17 February 2015 editPeatar (talk | contribs)119 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:03, 18 February 2015 edit undoKudpung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors109,256 edits →Thank you, but no thanks: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| --] (]) 12:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC) | --] (]) 12:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Thank you, but no thanks == | |||
| Your comment on my talk page was unnecessary. Consider yourself, in spite of any positive interaction we may have had in past, added to the extremely short list of users with whom I do not wish to collaborate and who are not welcome on my talk page. Thank you for your comprehension. --] (]) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:03, 18 February 2015
| This is Ceradon's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
Archive 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10
Your GA nomination of Dumas Brothel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dumas Brothel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 04:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- I haven't forgotten the GA review: major house renovation work has consumed evenings and weekends, I'll try to find an hour or two to re-review and to see if I can maybe add an architectural description. Acroterion (talk) 12:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- The National Register nomination for the Butte-Anaconda Historic District is available here . It's 449 pages, so I'm working through it to see if it describes the Dumas. It mentions the red-light district as part of the central business district. Acroterion (talk) 02:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't, it's just listed as a contributing structure (p. 124 of the appendix, listed as 41 E. Mercury). It does mention the underground connections. Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Acroterion: damn... I'll see what I can dig up as well and reply back if I find anything. Thank you, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- The Dumas is briefly mentioned on p. 27 in several paragraphs, mentioning examples of other houses. Acroterion (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just throwing this out there: http://www.thedumasbrothel.com/ It's barely secondary but if you cut through the marketing speak, you can quote it verbatim in a {{quote box}} in the Background section. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was hoping to add something along the lines of "the brothel is a two-story brick structure with a raised basement. The first and second floors are pierced by a large light well or atrium, surrounded by balconies ..." All of this is eminently true, but it's based on my personal observation, and is not citeable in a Good Article. The website can't support such a detailed description. Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- https://books.google.bs/books?id=wfGPEX0PA3wC&pg=PA228&dq=dumas+brothel+balcony&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tbPeVMnnFsmXNrPugogI&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dumas%20brothel%20balcony&f=false Check that out. I think that should do it. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've added a brief description and moved the first ref up to that paragraph. I don't think we'll get much better than that until someone publishes a detailed investigation. Acroterion (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'll return to the article this weekend for a last review, but not tonight - it's been a long week. Acroterion (talk) 03:49, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- https://books.google.bs/books?id=wfGPEX0PA3wC&pg=PA228&dq=dumas+brothel+balcony&hl=en&sa=X&ei=tbPeVMnnFsmXNrPugogI&ved=0CBsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dumas%20brothel%20balcony&f=false Check that out. I think that should do it. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- I was hoping to add something along the lines of "the brothel is a two-story brick structure with a raised basement. The first and second floors are pierced by a large light well or atrium, surrounded by balconies ..." All of this is eminently true, but it's based on my personal observation, and is not citeable in a Good Article. The website can't support such a detailed description. Acroterion (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Just throwing this out there: http://www.thedumasbrothel.com/ It's barely secondary but if you cut through the marketing speak, you can quote it verbatim in a {{quote box}} in the Background section. --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:23, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't, it's just listed as a contributing structure (p. 124 of the appendix, listed as 41 E. Mercury). It does mention the underground connections. Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
BridgeCity album proposed deletion
The album BridgeCity is proposed for deletion.
However, I request it be considered to remove this proposed deletion by yourself. The album has been reviewed by a professional review site (New Release Tuesday) and its release was given coverage by a few professional music sites (like Jesus Freak Hideout). I've seen plenty of articles much worse off than this, with less coverage and sources to boot, yet they aren't being threatened.
RhettGedies (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- Got into an edit conflict with you trying to remove the PROD template. Either way, I've nominated the article for deletion. You're welcome to comment there. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 08:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
FAC note
Sorry, I have a couple of reviews going at the moment and won't be able to reply to your responses at the Malvern Hill FAC till tomorrow. I hope to go through the whole article again then. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Mike Christie: no problem. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Seemi Zaidi
Yeah I thought about putting a copyright notice up for Seemi Zaidi but since it was so short I was not sure if it qualified so I put a AFD up (which you can comment as a speedy if you like) Wgolf (talk) 23:35, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Page Deletion of Peter Tan Organisation(PTO)
Hi,
You left a speedy deletion message on the page. As I'm new to wikipedia, is it possible if you could advise me on how I should change the content so that it will be acceptable for wikipedia's standard? Thank you very much! User:Juniaywq (talk) 11:13, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Juniaywq: First, welcome to Misplaced Pages! Now, Misplaced Pages has a general principle for notability (or criteria for inclusion into the encyclopedia): "Topics with significant coverage by multiple reliable, independent sources are presumed to be notable enough for inclusion into Misplaced Pages". You can read more on that here. Furthermore, articles must be written neutrally. You must give equal weight to all viewpoints of a topic: "Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without bias. This applies to both what you say and how you say it." In the Peter Tan Organisation(PTO) article, a piece of it looked as if it belonged in a Yellow Pages directory. Misplaced Pages is not a directory. As a final note, articles should use inline citations. See here for more information on that. I hope this isn't too much for you. Finally, I would recommend that you got here: The Misplaced Pages Adventure. That's a step-by-step guide through all the big stuff you need to know before creating articles. Go through that guide and you'll be well on your way to becoming an excellent editor. All the best on Misplaced Pages and hope to see you around. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 04:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2015
- From the editors: We want to know what you think!
- News and notes: One editor faces likely ban for work on Misplaced Pages; Jimmy Wales awarded $1 million
- In the media: Is Misplaced Pages eating itself?
- Featured content: A grizzly bear, Operation Mascot, Freedom Planet & Liberty Island, cosmic dust clouds, a cricket five-wicket list, more fine art, & a terrible, terrible opera...
- Traffic report: Bowled over
- WikiProject report: Brand new WikiProjects profiled
- Gallery: Feel the love
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
Thanks for your help with the University of Arizona / COI questions I had. Barrettbaffert (talk) 20:52, 12 February 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you --ceradon (talk • contribs) 21:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Barrettbaffert: when I said "keep the citations intact", I probably wasn't using the correct wording to convey what I was thinking. Please confirm that the information you added to the article is supported by the citations. If not, you should move the citations you had on the talk page to the article to ensure there are no referencing hiccups. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 00:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm
The article Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Battle of Garnett's & Golding's Farm for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion process
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion process. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.
For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
12:11:33, 17 February 2015 review of submission by Peatar
Yesterday OpenStreetMap.org has included GraphHopper for bike and foot routing which shows the notability of GraphHopper. Although even without this GraphHopper is 'notable' as articles were written in jaxenter and the Java magazine from Oracle (!)
Please review the draft again, including the new references :) !
--Peatar (talk) 12:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, but no thanks
Your comment on my talk page was unnecessary. Consider yourself, in spite of any positive interaction we may have had in past, added to the extremely short list of users with whom I do not wish to collaborate and who are not welcome on my talk page. Thank you for your comprehension. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)