Revision as of 17:41, 20 July 2006 editMDP23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,211 edits add bullet point← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:06, 20 July 2006 edit undoHunter91 (talk | contribs)139 edits removed biased content that may influence voteingNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
Dispute on talk page as to whether the page should be merged in ] or just deleted. |
Dispute on talk page as to whether the page should be merged in ] or just deleted. | ||
*'''Merge''' any worthwile content (I'm not sure that there is) then '''Redirect''' ] 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' any worthwile content (I'm not sure that there is) then '''Redirect''' ] 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
*Just plain '''Delete'''. ] 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | *Just plain '''Delete'''. ] 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''redirect''' probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --] 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | *'''redirect''' probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --] 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' "battle field 2", everything mentioned in original is alot better--] 14:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
*'''Merge''' this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. {{unsigned|Hunter91}} | *'''Merge''' this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. {{unsigned|Hunter91}} | ||
**'''Comment''' I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. ] 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | **'''Comment''' I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. ] 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
* '''Redirect''' to ], or just '''Delete'''. <font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | * '''Redirect''' to ], or just '''Delete'''. <font face="verdana"><small>]</small><nowiki>]</sup>|<sub>]</sub></font>] 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
* '''Delete''' This page is useless and has a much better predessor. --] 14:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:06, 20 July 2006
Battle Field 2
Dispute on talk page as to whether the page should be merged in Battlefield 2 or just deleted.
- Merge any worthwile content (I'm not sure that there is) then Redirect WilyD 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just plain Delete. Artw 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- redirect probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --Pboyd04 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter91 (talk • contribs)
- Comment I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. Martinp23 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Battlefield 2, or just Delete. JD 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)