Revision as of 17:57, 2 March 2015 edit89.134.28.154 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:12, 2 March 2015 edit undoJBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators195,886 edits Declining unblock requestNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=I have been blocked for no reason, unlike Christina1969 | decline = No you haven't. Anyone but an idiot can see from a quick look at the editing hsitroy that you are Christina1969 evading your block. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 20:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
{{unblock|I have been blocked for no reason, unlike Christina1969}} |
Revision as of 20:12, 2 March 2015
January 2015
At the moment, the rounding of measurements at Dreadnoughtus is contested, which is why I reverted your edits. Please gain consensus first before resurrecting that page's edit war with inflammatory edit summaries.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Dreadnoughtus, you may be blocked from editing. --Mr Fink (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Dreadnoughtus. Please gain consensus first on the talkpage.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones 20:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Reminder
Christina1969, are you aware that continuing to edit with this IP, and continuing to editwar while your current account is blocked from editing will result in a longer or indefinite block?--Mr Fink (talk) 21:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for evading a previous block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ed 21:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
89.134.28.154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been blocked for no reason, unlike Christina1969
Decline reason:
No you haven't. Anyone but an idiot can see from a quick look at the editing hsitroy that you are Christina1969 evading your block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.