Misplaced Pages

User talk:ER MD: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:25, 4 July 2006 edit162.119.232.101 (talk) Breath← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:49, 22 July 2006 edit undoER MD (talk | contribs)872 edits revert--I moved to a different profile and this one is no longer active 
(57 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== MY TALK PAGE POLICY ==

I respond to all comments. Afterwards, I delete these entries in a few days. I do not like clutter and I think keeping unimportant information is a waste of space. There is very little interesting content in a user's talk page. Reviewing a person's talk page is, in addition, a fruitless venture. Therefore, I will delete all entries and keep a clean page. It is my personal preference and it is supported by wiki policy (see talk page). Some people claim that the talk page is required to see a block log, but all editors have access to see how many times a person has been blocked. I find keeping unimportant information is a worthless endeavor. Thank you. ] 22:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

==Breath==

I knew you were going to bring that up, so allow me to explain: warning places accidently or without merit may be taken out-warnings put there for a reason are not supposed to be removed, ever. If you continue, you will be blocked again. The warnings you put on my page had not reason to be there. I can contribute without a username and it's obviously not against policy. And the 3RR rule doesn't apply when dealing with vandalism, which your removing of warnings constitues as. So calm down and stop removing warnings. <b>] <small><sup> ]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 22:22 (]) </font>

::And again, the '''inital warnings for "stopping" were invalid''' so removing them as according to what you are saying is valid, so i don't think you understand the initial reasons. Thank you. ] 00:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:49, 22 July 2006