| Revision as of 17:51, 5 July 2006 editIrishguy (talk | contribs)45,851 edits restored← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:49, 22 July 2006 edit undoER MD (talk | contribs)872 edits revert--I moved to a different profile and this one is no longer active | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I signed in on my new IP address. Of course I will have a new one tomorrow. :) | |||
| ] 08:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Note the difference in the IP addresses. | |||
| == user talk page policy == | |||
| Most users treat their user talk pages like regular talk pages, and archive the contents periodically to a personal subpage — either when the page gets too large, on a regular schedule, or when they take a wikivacation. '''Others delete comments after they have responded to them'''. | |||
| Actively erasing non-harassing personal messages without replying (if a reply would be appropriate or polite) will probably be interpreted as hostile. In the past, this kind of behavior has been viewed as uncivil, and this can become an issue in arbitration or other formal proceedings. Redirecting your user talk page to another page (whether meant as a joke or intended to be offensive or to send a "go away" message), except in the case of redirecting from one account to another when both are yours, can also be considered a hostile act. However, reverting such removals or redirects is not proper and may result in a block for edit warring. If someone removes your comments without answering, consider moving on or dispute resolution. This is especially true for vandalism warnings. | |||
| If you feel that your user talk page is getting too large and is taking a long time to load, you can create an archive and move the comments there. | |||
| Feel free to decorate your personal pages as you see fit, but keep in mind that your user talk page has the important function of allowing other editors to communicate with you. People will get upset if they cannot use it for that purpose. | |||
| ::I recognize that vandalism warnings need to stay if they are valid. If you look at my edits in the past, you will see that I have operated in good faith and developed a few articles. Given that this is the case, why not go directly to on the claim of vandalism. I think I will be vindicated. ] 00:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: was a warning for incivility. was a warning for personal attacks. was for personal attacks. was a warning for personal attacks. was for user attacks. and were for userpage vandalism. was a friendly reminder for blanking pages. Don't play dumb. You know what you've been doing and you are '''not''' allowed to remove messages. --] 01:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::And the two warnings I put up were for blanking content. You did it and then after it was reverted, you did it again a few minutes later . You cannot simply blank content you disagree with. Not in articles and not on your talk page. <font color="Green">]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">]</font></sup> 01:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This is getting retarded. I had a few warnings all in relationship to Nrcprm2026. You must have no life. Why don't you waste more time on this issue. I will reboot my router, get a new IP address and start up a new profile. ] 06:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Alright, I warned you. And you know that doesn't reset your IP, right? --] 06:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::My IP with Verizon is variable. All I do is turn it off, disconnect for a few hours, and then reconnect. The addresses are given as people go on and off the grid. But I appreciate your warnings, and only can surmise that talking with you is a complete waste of time. But for some reason you enjoy it. ] 07:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::You do realize you have two IPs, right? One is assigned to you by you ISP, in this case Verizon. The other is with your computer forever. Good luck escaping that. --] 07:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You are thinking of his ], which is removed before any packet leaves his LAN (and can be changed with a registry hack, but there's no reason to do it unless you're "hackzorzing" a wireless network). Also, he has a local IP address, but that can change depending if his router is setup to remember his local IP. The local IP doesn't matter at all though. Anyway, we have plenty of anons harassing us every minute. Another one doesn't matter and is really a non-issue. --]] 07:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Yep, here I am with a new IP already...(see edits). No wonder I had so much difficulty talking with 69.145.123.171. The guy does not know what he is talking about. Him and Irish Guy are complete retards... with the continued reverts of the talk page. To what end? To what benefit? Do people think about what they are doing or saying before they do or say it? I can only presume that these are the people who do it the way they are told to do it. The ones that can't think for themselves. I guess I have to give up my nice login and go for something a little more anonymous.... ] 09:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Clarifying== | |||
| A few days ago I asked you to contact me privately. You removed that request from this page several times, writing that my request was "bogus," "dumb," and/or merely an attempt to get your email address. I didn't and don't consider my request to be lacking in sincerity or intelligence, and I don't have any need or desire to know what your email address was or is. | |||
| It might seem that you were using the opportunity to remove my edits as a cover to also remove some other more grave ones. Of course, ], I know this couldn't be the case... | |||
| Regardless, my reason for trying to contact you was to ask you whether or not you were aware of any policies your employer may have with regard to Misplaced Pages. My own past experience has lead me to be more cognizant of how others might view my Misplaced Pages editing, especially in light of my position and/or employer. I wanted to try to make sure you didn't have to deal with the same situation I did, if, indeed, you were in the same situation I was in. At this point, given your (lack of/poor) response, I now no longer care. So best of luck. ] 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I would not even know how to do it without giving out my email address, and anything that needs to be said to me can be done on the talk page with the full knowledge that I will eventually delete it (smile). I would never write anything bad about the institution that I work for. Afterall, compared to the hospitals that I have worked at, Kaiser works pretty damn well. The only reason that people attack Kaiser, is because it is a big target. You can only expect so little insight from so many... | |||
| ::The problem isn't writing anything bad about your employer, the problem is writing anything at all. It is hard to shy away from accusations of a conflict of interest when an employee edits an article about their employer. That's not to say that I wholeheartedly agree with an employer dictating an employee's ability to edit Misplaced Pages, but nevertheless. You should check with your employer about their policies with regard to Misplaced Pages. You could start with your public affairs department. ] 17:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I give up. ] 22:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::::'''When you edit from your current location, without being logged in, your edits are irrevocably tied to an IP address which can be linked back to that current location. The owner of any particular IP address can be easily identified. You might want to double-check to be sure editing Misplaced Pages from that location (computer or network) is generally acceptable.''' ] 23:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::The IP is for the whole facility. I sometimes edit on different computers when I have some down time. For some reason, the IP is the same even with different computers being used. So there must be some addition routing information within the network. Not worried about any action...I have one of the highest patient satisfaction ratings and peer review scores. :) as for this theread, eventually I will try and delete it all since I have responded. Again, thanks for the concern.] 05:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Damn, I got a one week block for block evasion... == | |||
| Wow... can somebody up it to permanent block and then just delete the talk page? | |||
| == Restored conversation == | |||
| This is getting retarded. I had a few warnings all in relationship to Nrcprm2026. You must have no life. Why don't you waste more time on this issue. I will reboot my router, get a new IP address and start up a new profile. ] 06:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Alright, I warned you. And you know that doesn't reset your IP, right? --] 06:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::My IP with Verizon is variable. All I do is turn it off, disconnect for a few hours, and then reconnect. The addresses are given as people go on and off the grid. But I appreciate your warnings, and only can surmise that talking with you is a complete waste of time. But for some reason you enjoy it. ] 07:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::You do realize you have two IPs, right? One is assigned to you by you ISP, in this case Verizon. The other is with your computer forever. Good luck escaping that. --] 07:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::You are thinking of his ], which is removed before any packet leaves his LAN (and can be changed with a registry hack, but there's no reason to do it unless you're "hackzorzing" a wireless network). Also, he has a local IP address, but that can change depending if his router is setup to remember his local IP. The local IP doesn't matter at all though. Anyway, we have plenty of anons harassing us every minute. Another one doesn't matter and is really a non-issue. --]] 07:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Does somebody want to keep this conversation acrhived as well... It is so fascinating... Will try and remove in a day or so... ] 05:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) | |||