Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Prashant!: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:03, 9 April 2015 editKrimuk2.0 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,983 edits request CheckUser← Previous edit Revision as of 14:51, 9 April 2015 edit undoKrish! (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users17,804 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit →
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


=====<big>09 April 2015</big>===== =====<big>09 April 2015</big>=====
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}} {{SPI case status|endorse}}


;Suspected sockpuppets ;Suspected sockpuppets
Line 25: Line 25:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


I am amazed to see this. Well to be honest I don't know much about Dan0001. Only know that he is also interested in Chopra's articles like I do. I think you are wasting your time and I want an apology. How can you do this? My exams are going on and you have done this. I ask Administrators to check verify so that this can be closed sonn. I have no idea about that user. Who know Dan0001 is Krimuk90 himself. He might be playing safe to get me blocked after planning and making paths to come to this.—] 03:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


:I think you have not something of "Co-incidence". Get a life.—] 03:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
⚫ ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======


I have opposed you once but, supported you so many times. ], ] and ]. If I was that user don't you thik I would have opposed simultaneously?—] 03:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


For god sake, when this drama will over? Why the hell are administrators not checking right away? This is ridiculous that's why there are no comments on that page. Krimuk90, I will never forgive you for putting me into this trouble with no reasons.—] 14:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

⚫ ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
*{{Endorse}} - By the way, this should be merged with ]. '''] ]''' 09:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 14:51, 9 April 2015

Pks1142

Pks1142 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142/Archive.

Please note that a case was originally opened under Prashant! (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142. Future cases should be placed under Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pks1142.


09 April 2015

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

Suspected sockpuppets


  • In the 3rd FLC nomination of Priyanka Chopra's awards page nominated by Prashant, Daan0001 gave a no-comments added "support" here. This is exactly the same as the 1st FLC nomination of the same page in which Green Parakeet supported the list. To establish a background, Green Parakeet was a confirmed sock of Prashant.
  • Also suspicious is how Daan0001's contributions were limited to a maximum of 2-3 edits since October. Their contributions here increased in late-March/April, which is when Prashant nominated the Priyanka Chopra awards page at the FLC.
  • Not the only failed FLC of Prashant in which Daan0001 gave such a support. He did so here as well.
  • Another similar pattern between Prashant and Daan0001 is to give a straight-out oppose to my FAC nomination, despite them already having supports from established users. Prashant did that here and Daan0001 did the exact same thing here.
  • Notice how the previous sock Green Parakeet awarded Prashant with a barnstar for their edits on Priyanka Chopra. Daan0001 gave Prashant a very similar-type of barnstar here.
  • And as expected, they have both made significant edits to Chopra-related articles, in particular her film Mary Kom. Look at this and this.
  • To conclude, neither of the users are proficient in English, and struggle to string together grammatically correct sentences, as apparent in this thread. Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I am amazed to see this. Well to be honest I don't know much about Dan0001. Only know that he is also interested in Chopra's articles like I do. I think you are wasting your time and I want an apology. How can you do this? My exams are going on and you have done this. I ask Administrators to check verify so that this can be closed sonn. I have no idea about that user. Who know Dan0001 is Krimuk90 himself. He might be playing safe to get me blocked after planning and making paths to come to this.—Prashant 03:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I think you have not something of "Co-incidence". Get a life.—Prashant 03:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I have opposed you once but, supported you so many times. Here, here and here. If I was that user don't you thik I would have opposed simultaneously?—Prashant 03:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

For god sake, when this drama will over? Why the hell are administrators not checking right away? This is ridiculous that's why there are no comments on that page. Krimuk90, I will never forgive you for putting me into this trouble with no reasons.—Prashant 14:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: